Carvalho Pedro David, Savy Florencia, Moragues Carmen, Juanola Xavier, Rodriguez-Moreno Jesus
Acta Reumatol Port. 2017 Apr-Jun;42(2):176-182.
The definition of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still under debate. Currently, the axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) criteria defined by Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) may be the most adequate.(1) The aims of present study were to assess axial involvement according to ASAS criteria in an observational PsA cohort and define the clinical characteristics more associated with this kind of involvement. Our study included consecutive patients who had a visit in a tertiary Rheumatology centre. All patients included fulfill ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria for PsA and all of them had a recent radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis. Clinical and laboratorial data were taken into account to classify patients as fulfilling or not ASAS criteria for axial SpA. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed about their association with presence of ASAS criteria of axial SpA in an univariable logistic regression analysis. Variables with a p-value <0.05 were re-tested in a multivariable logistic regression. Those variables that maintained statistical significance were tested alone in another multivariable model. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 20.0). Regarding the 233 patients included, only 42 patients (19.4%) fulfilled ASAS criteria for axial SpA. However, 22 patients had asymptomatic radiographic sacroiliitis according to modified New York criteria. The prevalence of asymptomatic sacroiliitis was 15.7% between patients without axial symptoms. In multivariable analysis, inflammatory back pain (IBP) [OR=25.111; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.770, 71.900, p-value <0.001], presence of HLA-B27 [OR=9.072; 95% CI=2.756, 29.860; p-value <0.001] and male gender [OR=3.767; 95% CI=1.264, 11.232; p-value = 0.017] were associated to axial involvement according to ASAS criteria. Axial SpA ASAS criteria are useful to identify axial involvement in PsA patients. This type of involvement is more common in males, in the presence of HLA-B27 and IBP. Axial disease should be systematically assessed in clinical practice, mainly in patients presenting with this clinical features.
银屑病关节炎(PsA)中轴受累的定义仍存在争议。目前,由国际脊柱关节炎评估协会(ASAS)定义的中轴型脊柱关节炎(SpA)标准可能是最恰当的。(1)本研究的目的是根据ASAS标准评估一个观察性PsA队列中的中轴受累情况,并确定与这种受累更相关的临床特征。我们的研究纳入了在一家三级风湿病中心就诊的连续患者。所有纳入的患者均符合银屑病关节炎分类标准(CASPAR),且均近期进行了骶髂关节炎的影像学评估。考虑临床和实验室数据,将患者分类为符合或不符合中轴SpA的ASAS标准。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,分析临床和人口统计学数据与中轴SpA的ASAS标准存在情况的关联。p值<0.05的变量在多变量逻辑回归中重新检验。在另一个多变量模型中单独检验那些保持统计学显著性的变量。使用IBM SPSS Statistics(版本20.0)进行分析。对于纳入的233例患者,仅有42例(19.4%)符合中轴SpA的ASAS标准。然而,根据改良纽约标准,22例患者有无症状性骶髂关节炎。在无中轴症状的患者中,无症状骶髂关节炎的患病率为15.7%。在多变量分析中,炎性背痛(IBP)[比值比(OR)=25.111;95%置信区间(CI)=8.770, 71.900,p值<0.001]、HLA - B27的存在[OR=9.072;95% CI=2.756, 29.860;p值<0.001]和男性性别[OR=3.767;95% CI=1.264, 11.232;p值 = 0.017]与根据ASAS标准的中轴受累相关。ASAS标准的中轴SpA有助于识别PsA患者的中轴受累情况。这种受累在男性、存在HLA - B27和IBP的情况下更为常见。在临床实践中,应系统评估中轴疾病,主要是针对具有这些临床特征的患者。