Liu Mei-Juan, Men Yan-Ming, Zhang Yong-Lin, Zhang Yu-Xi, Liu Hao
Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264001, P.R. China.
Department of Ultrasound, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong 264001, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):867-871. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6245. Epub 2017 May 24.
We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic values of conventional ultrasound (US), ultrasound contrast (UC) and ultrasound elastography (UE) in distinguishing the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. A total of 100 patients with thyroid nodules receiving operative treatment were selected; they underwent the conventional US, UE and UC examinations before operation, respectively. The nodules received pathological examination after operation to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accordance rate of each diagnostic method was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was calculated. The manifestations of malignant thyroid nodules in conventional US examination were mostly the hypoecho, heterogeneous echo, irregular shape, unclear boundary, aspect ratio <1, microcalcification and irregular peripheral echo halo, and there were statistically significant differences compared with the benign nodules (P<0.05). UE showed that the differences between benign and malignant nodules in 2, 3 and 4 points were statistically significant (P<0.05). The manifestations of malignant nodules in UC were mostly the irregular shape, obscure boundary, no obvious enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement and visible perfusion defects, and there were statistically significant differences compared with the benign nodules (P<0.05). ROC curve showed that both sensitivity and specificity of UE and UC were superior to those of conventional US. AUC was the largest (AUC = 0.908) and the diagnostic value was the highest in the conventional US combined with UE and UC. Conventional US combined with elastography and UC can significantly improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
我们旨在评估传统超声(US)、超声造影(UC)和超声弹性成像(UE)在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中的诊断价值。选取100例接受手术治疗的甲状腺结节患者,术前分别对其进行传统超声、超声弹性成像和超声造影检查。术后对结节进行病理检查以区分良性和恶性病变。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估各诊断方法的敏感性、特异性和诊断符合率,并计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。甲状腺恶性结节在传统超声检查中的表现多为低回声、回声不均匀、形态不规则、边界不清、纵横比<1、微小钙化及周边回声晕不规则,与良性结节相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。超声弹性成像显示,2分、3分和4分的良恶性结节之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。超声造影中恶性结节的表现多为形态不规则、边界模糊、无明显增强、增强不均匀及可见灌注缺损,与良性结节相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,超声弹性成像和超声造影的敏感性和特异性均优于传统超声。传统超声联合超声弹性成像和超声造影时AUC最大(AUC = 0.908),诊断价值最高。传统超声联合弹性成像和超声造影可显著提高甲状腺良恶性结节诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性。