• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hospital staffs' perceptions of an electronic program to engage patients in nutrition care at the bedside: a qualitative study.医院工作人员对一项让患者在床边参与营养护理的电子项目的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0495-4.
2
Technology to engage hospitalised patients in their nutrition care: a qualitative study of usability and patient perceptions of an electronic foodservice system.技术使住院患者参与其营养护理:一项关于电子餐饮服务系统可用性和患者感知的定性研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;30(5):563-573. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12467. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Hospital Staffs' Perceptions of Postoperative Nutrition Among Colorectal Patients: A Qualitative Study.医院工作人员对结直肠患者术后营养的认知:一项定性研究。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;35(2):306-314. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10315. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
A qualitative exploration of factors influencing medical staffs' decision-making around nutrition prescription after colorectal surgery.对影响结直肠手术后医护人员营养处方决策因素的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4011-7.
5
Hospital patients' perceptions of using a technology-based intervention to participate in their nutrition care: A qualitative descriptive study.医院患者对使用基于技术的干预措施参与其营养护理的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020 Oct;39:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Nurse perceptions of person-centered handovers in the oncological inpatient setting: A qualitative study.护士对肿瘤住院患者环境中以患者为中心的交接班的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Changing nutrition care practices in hospital: a thematic analysis of hospital staff perspectives.改变医院的营养护理实践:对医院工作人员观点的主题分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2409-7.
8
Engaging hospitalised patients in their nutrition care using technology: development of the NUTRI-TEC intervention.运用技术让住院患者参与自身营养护理:NUTRI-TEC 干预措施的制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5017-x.
9
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
10
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing delegation and technology to identify and manage malnutrition in a digital hospital: An implementation study.利用授权和技术在数字医院中识别和管理营养不良:一项实施研究。
Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr;82(2):218-230. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12913. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
2
Patient-Led, Technology-Assisted Malnutrition Risk Screening in Hospital: A Feasibility Study.患者主导、技术辅助的医院营养不良风险筛查:一项可行性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 12;16(8):1139. doi: 10.3390/nu16081139.
3
Process evaluation of the implementation of a decision support system to prevent and treat disease-related malnutrition in a hospital setting.医院环境中用于预防和治疗与疾病相关的营养不良的决策支持系统实施的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06236-3.
4
Using Technology to Promote Patient Engagement in Nutrition Care: A Feasibility Study.利用技术促进患者参与营养护理:一项可行性研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Jan 22;13(2):314. doi: 10.3390/nu13020314.
5
Engaging hospitalised patients in their nutrition care using technology: development of the NUTRI-TEC intervention.运用技术让住院患者参与自身营养护理:NUTRI-TEC 干预措施的制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5017-x.
6
Health practitioner practices and their influence on nutritional intake of hospitalised patients.医疗从业者的行为及其对住院患者营养摄入的影响。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Mar 11;6(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.03.008. eCollection 2019 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Using technology to engage hospitalised patients in their care: a realist review.利用技术促使住院患者参与自身护理:一项现实主义综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 6;17(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2314-0.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
3
Cardiac patients show high interest in technology enabled cardiovascular rehabilitation.心脏病患者对技术支持的心脏康复表现出浓厚兴趣。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 19;16:95. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0329-9.
4
The Impact of Information Technology on Patient Engagement and Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review of the Literature.信息技术对患者参与和健康行为改变的影响:文献系统综述。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jan 21;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4514.
5
Interactive tools for inpatient medication tracking: a multi-phase study with cardiothoracic surgery patients.住院患者用药跟踪的交互式工具:一项针对心胸外科手术患者的多阶段研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):144-58. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv160. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
7
The effect of tablet computers with a mobile patient portal application on hospitalized patients' knowledge and activation.配备移动患者门户应用程序的平板电脑对住院患者知识水平和积极性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):159-65. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv058. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Feasibility of a patient-centred nutrition intervention to improve oral intakes of patients at risk of pressure ulcer: a pilot randomised control trial.以患者为中心的营养干预改善压疮风险患者口服摄入量的可行性:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Jun;30(2):271-80. doi: 10.1111/scs.12239. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
9
Use of electronic dietary assessment tools in primary care: an interdisciplinary perspective.初级保健中电子膳食评估工具的使用:跨学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Feb 25;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0138-6.
10
Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study.在不同临床环境中使用理论领域框架的经验:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Mar 18;8:139-46. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458. eCollection 2015.

医院工作人员对一项让患者在床边参与营养护理的电子项目的看法:一项定性研究。

Hospital staffs' perceptions of an electronic program to engage patients in nutrition care at the bedside: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Roberts Shelley, Marshall Andrea, Chaboyer Wendy

机构信息

National Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0495-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-017-0495-4
PMID:28693472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advancements in technology are enabling patients to participate in their health care through self-monitoring and self-management of diet, exercise and chronic disease. Technologies allowing patients to participate in hospital care are still emerging but show promise. Our team is developing a program by which hospitalised patients can participate in their nutrition care. This study explores hospital staffs' perceptions of using this technology to engage patients in their care.

METHODS

This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with hospital staff providing routine nutrition care to patients (i.e. dietitians, nutrition assistants, nurses, doctors and foodservice staff) from five wards at a tertiary metropolitan teaching hospital in Australia. The hospital currently uses an electronic foodservice system (EFS) for patient meal ordering, accessed through personal screens at the bedside. Participants were shown the EFS program on an iPad and asked about their perceptions of the program, with questions from a semi-structured interview guide. Staff were interviewed individually or in small focus groups. Interviews lasted 15-30 min and were audio recorded and later transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen staff participated in interviews. Overall, they expressed positive views of the EFS program and wanted it to be implemented in practice. Their responses formed three themes, each with a number of subthemes: 1) Enacting patient participation in practice; 2) Optimising nutrition care; and 3) Considerations for implementing an EFS program in practice. Staff thought the program would improve various aspects of nutrition care and enable patient participation in care. Whilst they raised some concerns, they focused on overcoming barriers and facilitating implementation if the program were to be adopted into practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Staff found an EFS program designed to engage patients in their nutrition care acceptable, as they saw benefits to using it for both patients and staff. Staff recognised characteristics of the program itself, as well as allocation of roles and responsibilities in operationalising it, were pivotal for successful implementation in practice. Their perspectives will inform program and intervention design, and implementation and evaluation strategies.

摘要

背景

技术进步使患者能够通过自我监测以及饮食、运动和慢性病的自我管理参与自身医疗保健。让患者参与医院护理的技术仍在不断涌现,但前景广阔。我们的团队正在开发一个项目,使住院患者能够参与自身的营养护理。本研究探讨医院工作人员对使用该技术让患者参与护理的看法。

方法

这项定性研究包括对澳大利亚一家大都市三级教学医院五个病房中为患者提供常规营养护理的医院工作人员(即营养师、营养助理、护士、医生和餐饮服务人员)进行半结构化访谈。该医院目前使用电子餐饮服务系统(EFS)进行患者订餐,可通过床边的个人屏幕访问。研究人员在iPad上向参与者展示了EFS程序,并根据半结构化访谈指南中的问题询问他们对该程序的看法。工作人员单独或在小型焦点小组中接受访谈。访谈持续15 - 30分钟,进行了录音并随后转录。数据采用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

19名工作人员参与了访谈。总体而言,他们对EFS程序表达了积极看法,并希望将其应用于实际。他们的回答形成了三个主题,每个主题都有若干子主题:1)在实践中实现患者参与;2)优化营养护理;3)在实践中实施EFS程序的考虑因素。工作人员认为该程序将改善营养护理的各个方面,并使患者能够参与护理。虽然他们提出了一些担忧,但如果该程序要付诸实践,他们专注于克服障碍并促进实施。

结论

工作人员认为旨在让患者参与营养护理的EFS程序是可以接受的,因为他们认为该程序对患者和工作人员都有益处。工作人员认识到该程序本身的特点以及在实施过程中的角色和责任分配对于在实践中成功实施至关重要。他们的观点将为项目和干预措施的设计以及实施和评估策略提供参考。