• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的患者出院后两年的护理费用。

Two-year post-discharge costs of care among patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in Germany.

作者信息

Kaier Klaus, von Kampen Frederike, Baumbach Hardy, von Zur Mühlen Constantin, Hehn Philip, Vach Werner, Zehender Manfred, Bode Christoph, Reinöhl Jochen

机构信息

Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2432-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2432-8
PMID:28693565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study presents data on post-discharge costs of care among patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement over a two year period.

METHODS

Based on a prospective clinical trial, post-discharge utilization of health services and status of assistance were collected for 151 elderly patients via 2250 monthly telephone interviews, valued using standardized unit costs and analysed using two-part regression models.

RESULTS

At month 1 post-discharge, total costs of care are substantially elevated (monthly mean: €3506.7) and then remain relatively stable over the following 23 months (monthly mean: €622.3). As expected, the majority of these costs are related to in-hospital care (~98% in month 1 post-discharge and ~72% in months 2-24). Patients that died during follow-up were associated with substantially higher cost estimates of in-hospital care than those surviving the two-year study period, while patients' age and other patient characteristics were of minor relevance. Estimated costs of outpatient care are lower at month 1 than during the rest of the study period, and not affected by the event of death during follow-up. The estimated costs of nursing care are, in contrast, much higher in year 2 than in year 1 and differ substantially by gender and type of procedure as well as by patients' age. Overall, these monthly cost estimates add up to €10,352 for the first and €7467.6 for the second year post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial cost increases at month 1 post-discharge and in case of death during follow-up are the main findings of the study, which should be taken into account in future economic evaluations on the topic. Application of standardized unit costs in combination with monthly patient interviews allows for a far more precise estimate of the variability in post-discharge health service utilization in this group of patients than the ones given in previous studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register Nr. DRKS00000797 .

摘要

背景

本研究展示了在两年时间内接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的患者出院后护理成本的数据。

方法

基于一项前瞻性临床试验,通过2250次月度电话访谈收集了151名老年患者出院后医疗服务的使用情况和援助状况,使用标准化单位成本进行估值,并采用两部分回归模型进行分析。

结果

出院后第1个月,护理总成本大幅升高(月均值:3506.7欧元),随后在接下来的23个月内保持相对稳定(月均值:622.3欧元)。正如预期的那样,这些成本的大部分与住院护理有关(出院后第1个月约为98%,第2 - 24个月约为72%)。随访期间死亡的患者与两年研究期内存活患者相比,住院护理成本估计要高得多,而患者的年龄和其他患者特征相关性较小。门诊护理的估计成本在第1个月低于研究期的其余时间,且不受随访期间死亡事件的影响。相比之下,护理成本估计在第2年比第1年高得多,并且因性别、手术类型以及患者年龄而有很大差异。总体而言,这些月度成本估计在出院后的第一年总计为10352欧元,第二年为7467.6欧元。

结论

出院后第1个月成本大幅增加以及随访期间死亡情况下成本增加是本研究的主要发现,在未来关于该主题的经济评估中应予以考虑。与月度患者访谈相结合应用标准化单位成本,比以往研究更能精确估计该组患者出院后医疗服务利用的变异性。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册编号DRKS00000797 。

相似文献

1
Two-year post-discharge costs of care among patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in Germany.德国接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的患者出院后两年的护理费用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2432-8.
2
Quality of life among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement- a model-based longitudinal data analysis.经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术老年患者的生活质量——基于模型的纵向数据分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jul 26;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0512-9.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expanding Prosthesis Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用自膨胀式人工瓣膜与外科主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.046.
4
Analysis of the additional costs of clinical complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the German Health Care System.德国医疗保健系统中经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者临床并发症的额外费用分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.095. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
5
Contemporary Costs Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Cost Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的当代成本:一项倾向匹配成本分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):154-60; discussion 160. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.120. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
6
In-hospital resource utilization in surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的院内资源利用情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Oct 22;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0118-x.
7
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard care among inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) trial (Cohort B).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与无法手术的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者标准治疗的成本效益比较:来自放置主动脉经导管瓣膜(PARTNER)试验(队列 B)的结果。
Circulation. 2012 Mar 6;125(9):1102-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054072. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
8
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and comparable risk: cost-utility and its determinants.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术与手术置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄且风险相当患者的比较:成本效益及其决定因素
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.109. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
Comparing post-operative resource consumption following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and conventional aortic valve replacement in the UK.比较英国经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)和传统主动脉瓣置换术后的资源消耗情况。
J Med Econ. 2014 May;17(5):357-64. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.904322. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Early post-approval experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the USA.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术批准后的早期经验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Aug;59(4):619-625. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10321-1. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic impact of a local, collaborative, stepped, and personalized care management for older people with chronic diseases: results from the randomized comparative effectiveness LoChro-trial.本地化、协作式、阶梯式和个性化的老年人慢性病管理对经济的影响:来自随机对照效果 LoChro 试验的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):1422. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10401-1.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in German Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients at Low Surgical Mortality Risk.SAPIEN 3 经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低外科死亡率的德国重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效益比较。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):1031-1046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02392-y. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Availability of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement on Clinical Practice.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可及性对临床实践的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2438-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500893.
2
Predicting hospital costs for patients receiving renal replacement therapy to inform an economic evaluation.预测接受肾脏替代治疗患者的住院费用,以为经济评估提供信息。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jul;17(6):659-68. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0705-x. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
3
Statistical models for the analysis of skewed healthcare cost data: a simulation study.
用于分析偏态医疗成本数据的统计模型:一项模拟研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2015 May 27;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0045-7. eCollection 2015.
4
Healthcare Cost Regressions: Going Beyond the Mean to Estimate the Full Distribution.医疗成本回归:超越均值以估计完整分布
Health Econ. 2015 Sep;24(9):1192-212. doi: 10.1002/hec.3178. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Two-year survival of patients screened for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with potentially malignant incidental findings in initial body computed tomography.在初次胸部计算机断层扫描中发现潜在恶性偶然病变的经导管主动脉瓣置换术筛查患者的两年生存率
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;16(7):731-7. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev055. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
"Heart Team" decision making in elderly patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis who underwent AVR or TAVI - a look behind the curtain. Results of the prospective TAVI Calculation of Costs Trial (TCCT).有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄老年患者接受主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)或经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)时的“心脏团队”决策制定——幕后观察。前瞻性经导管主动脉瓣植入术成本计算试验(TCCT)的结果
EuroIntervention. 2015 Nov;11(7):793-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M12_06.
7
Cost effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with medical management or surgery for patients with aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与药物治疗或外科手术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效益比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Feb;13(1):29-45. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0141-6.
8
Analysis of the additional costs of clinical complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the German Health Care System.德国医疗保健系统中经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者临床并发症的额外费用分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.095. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Rationale, development, implementation, and initial results of a fast track protocol for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)快速通道方案的基本原理、制定、实施及初步结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85(4):648-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25749. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
10
Cost-utility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis treated by medical management: a UK cost-utility analysis based on patient-level data from the ADVANCE study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗药物治疗的重度主动脉瓣狭窄不可手术患者的成本效用:基于ADVANCE研究患者层面数据的英国成本效用分析
Open Heart. 2014 Oct 23;1(1):e000155. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000155. eCollection 2014.