Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jan;18(1):154-162. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14420. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Until recently, pancreas transplantation has mostly been performed with exocrine drainage via duodenojejunostomy (DJ). Since 2012, DJ was substituted with duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in our hospital, allowing endoscopic access for biopsies. This study assessed safety profiles with DD versus DJ procedures and clinical outcomes with the DD technique in pancreas transplantation. DD patients (n = 117; 62 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK ] and 55 pancreas transplantation alone [PTA ] with median follow-up 2.2 years) were compared with DJ patients (n = 179; 167 SPK and 12 PTA ) transplanted in the period 1998-2012 (pre-DD era). Postoperative bleeding and pancreas graft vein thrombosis requiring relaparotomy occurred in 17% and 9% of DD patients versus 10% (p = 0.077) and 6% (p = 0.21) in DJ patients, respectively. Pancreas graft rejection rates were still higher in PTA patients versus SPK patients (p = 0.003). Hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss was 2.25 (95% CI 1.00, 5.05; p = 0.049) in PTA versus SPK recipients. In conclusion, compared with the DJ procedure, the DD procedure did not reduce postoperative surgical complications requiring relaparatomy or improve clinical outcomes after pancreas transplantation despite serial pancreatic biopsies for rejection surveillance. It remains to be seen whether better rejection monitoring in DD patients translates into improved long-term pancreas graft survival.
直到最近,胰腺移植大多采用十二指肠空肠吻合术(DJ)进行外分泌引流。自 2012 年以来,我院已将 DJ 术式替换为十二指肠端端吻合术(DD),以便进行内镜活检。本研究评估了 DD 与 DJ 术式的安全性,并评估了 DD 技术在胰腺移植中的临床结果。DD 组患者(n=117;62 例胰肾联合移植[SPK]和 55 例单纯胰腺移植[PTA],中位随访时间为 2.2 年)与 1998-2012 年(DD 前时代)接受 DJ 术式的 179 例患者(167 例 SPK 和 12 例 PTA)进行了比较。DD 组患者术后出血和需要再次剖腹手术的胰腺静脉血栓形成发生率分别为 17%和 9%,而 DJ 组患者分别为 10%(p=0.077)和 6%(p=0.21)。PTA 患者的胰腺移植物排斥反应发生率仍高于 SPK 患者(p=0.003)。PTA 患者与 SPK 患者相比,移植物丢失的风险比(HR)为 2.25(95%CI 1.00,5.05;p=0.049)。结论是,与 DJ 术式相比,DD 术式并未减少需要再次剖腹手术的术后手术并发症,也未改善胰腺移植后的临床结果,尽管进行了排斥监测的胰腺活检。DD 患者的排斥监测是否更好,是否能转化为改善长期胰腺移植物存活率,还有待观察。