Kim Jin Hee, Byun Jae Ho, Kim Myung-Hwan, Lee Sung Koo, Kim Song Cheol, Kim Hyoung Jung, Lee Seung Soo, Kim So Yeon, Lee Moon-Gyu
From the Departments of *Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, †Internal Medicine, and ‡Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Pancreas. 2017 Aug;46(7):921-926. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000853.
The aim of this study was to intraindividually compare magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP) image quality at 1.5 T and 3.0 T when demonstrating main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).
Thirty prospectively enrolled patients with AIP underwent MRP at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T followed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography before treatment. Two readers independently analyzed the MRP images and graded the visualization of MPD strictures and full-length MPD, using endoscopic retrograde pancreatography as the reference standard, as well as overall image artifacts on a 4-point scale. The contrast between the MPD and periductal area was calculated using a region-of-interest measurement.
Visualization scores of MPD strictures and full-length MPD, and summed scores of each qualitative analysis, were significantly greater at 3.0-T MRP than at 1.5-T MRP for both readers (P ≤ 0.02). There were less image artifacts at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T (P ≤ 0.052). The contrast between the MPD and periductal area was significantly greater at 3.0-T MRP than at 1.5-T MRP (P < 0.001).
The MRP at 3.0 T was superior to 1.5-T MRP for demonstrating MPD abnormalities in AIP, with better image contrast and fewer image artifacts. Consequently, 3.0-T MRP may be useful for the diagnosis and management of patients with AIP.
本研究旨在对1.5 T和3.0 T磁共振胰胆管造影(MRP)在显示自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)患者主胰管(MPD)异常时的图像质量进行个体内比较。
30例前瞻性纳入的AIP患者在治疗前分别接受了1.5 T和3.0 T的MRP检查,随后进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影。两名阅片者独立分析MRP图像,并以内镜逆行胰胆管造影为参考标准,对MPD狭窄和MPD全长的显示情况进行评分,同时对整体图像伪影按4分制进行分级。使用感兴趣区测量法计算MPD与导管周围区域之间的对比度。
对于两名阅片者而言,3.0 T MRP时MPD狭窄和MPD全长的显示评分以及各项定性分析的总分均显著高于1.5 T MRP(P≤0.02)。与1.5 T相比,3.0 T时的图像伪影更少(P≤0.052)。3.0 T MRP时MPD与导管周围区域之间的对比度显著高于1.5 T MRP(P<0.001)。
在显示AIP患者的MPD异常方面,3.0 T MRP优于1.5 T MRP,具有更好的图像对比度和更少的图像伪影。因此,3.0 T MRP可能有助于AIP患者的诊断和管理。