• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膀胱过度活动症是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后实现尿失禁控制的一个负面预测指标。

Overactive bladder is a negative predictor of achieving continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Yamada Yuta, Fujimura Tetsuya, Fukuhara Hiroshi, Sugihara Toru, Miyazaki Hideyo, Nakagawa Tohru, Kume Haruki, Igawa Yasuhiko, Homma Yukio

机构信息

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2017 Oct;24(10):749-756. doi: 10.1111/iju.13411. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1111/iju.13411
PMID:28697538
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate predictors of continence outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Clinical records of 272 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were investigated. Preoperative Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score and clinicopathological factors were investigated, and relationships between factors and recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were assessed. The presence of overactive bladder was defined as having urgency for more than once a week and having ≥3 points according to the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.

RESULTS

Age (≤66 years) was significantly associated with continence within 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (P = 0.033). The absence of overactive bladder and lower Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (<3) were significantly associated with recovery of continence within 12 months after surgery (both variables P = 0.009). In terms of achieving recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Kaplan-Meier curves showed earlier recovery in "age ≤66 years," "prostate weight ≤40 g" and "overactive bladder symptom score <3" (P = 0.0072, 0.0172 and 0.0140, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of overactive bladder was an independent negative predictor for recovery of continence within 12 months after surgery (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of baseline overactive bladder seems to represent an independent negative predictor for recovery of continence at 12 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

摘要

目的

探讨机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后控尿结果的预测因素。

方法

对272例行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的临床记录进行研究。调查术前膀胱过度活动症症状评分、国际前列腺症状评分及临床病理因素,并评估这些因素与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后控尿恢复之间的关系。膀胱过度活动症的定义为每周尿急次数超过一次且根据膀胱过度活动症症状评分≥3分。

结果

年龄(≤66岁)与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后6个月内的控尿显著相关(P = 0.033)。无膀胱过度活动症及较低的膀胱过度活动症症状评分(<3)与术后12个月内控尿恢复显著相关(两个变量P均 = 0.009)。就机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后实现控尿恢复而言,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示“年龄≤66岁”“前列腺重量≤40 g”和“膀胱过度活动症症状评分<3”恢复较早(分别为P = 0.0072、0.0172和0.0140)。多因素分析显示,膀胱过度活动症的存在是术后12个月内控尿恢复的独立负性预测因素(P = 0.019)。

结论

基线膀胱过度活动症的存在似乎是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后12个月控尿恢复的独立负性预测因素。

相似文献

1
Overactive bladder is a negative predictor of achieving continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱过度活动症是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后实现尿失禁控制的一个负面预测指标。
Int J Urol. 2017 Oct;24(10):749-756. doi: 10.1111/iju.13411. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Atherosclerosis as a predictor of transient exacerbation of overactive bladder symptoms after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.动脉粥样硬化作为机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后膀胱过度活动症症状短暂加重的预测指标。
Int J Urol. 2019 Feb;26(2):234-240. doi: 10.1111/iju.13848. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
3
Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺根治术较传统机器人辅助前列腺根治术在早期恢复控尿方面具有优势:1863 例患者倾向性评分匹配分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):137-144. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000461. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
5
Impact of metabolic syndrome on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.代谢综合征对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期控尿恢复的影响。
Int J Urol. 2017 Sep;24(9):692-697. doi: 10.1111/iju.13406. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
6
Factors affecting urinary continence and sexual potency recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控和性功能恢复的因素。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):703-712. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0704.
7
De novo overactive bladder after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后新发膀胱过度活动症。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Aug;37(6):2008-2014. doi: 10.1002/nau.23556. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.改良横纹肌括约肌重建对机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期控尿功能恢复和吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
9
Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的尿失禁:膀胱内前列腺突出的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Sep;57(5):1145-51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1145.
10
Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients with Prior Transurethral Subvesical Deobstruction: Results of a High-Volume Center.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗有经尿道膀胱下尿路梗阻史的前列腺癌患者的围手术期和术后结果:高容量中心的结果。
J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):308-318. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001776. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and risk-stratification model of biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性患者生化复发的危险因素及风险分层模型
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 4;19(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02426-x.
2
"Fish-hook" suturing technique reduces vascular injuries of the pelvic wall during vesico-urethral anastomosis and impacts urinary continence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.“鱼钩”缝合技术可减少机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱尿道吻合时盆腔壁的血管损伤,并影响尿失禁情况。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 27;19(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02275-8.
3
Bladder mucosal smoothness predicts early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
膀胱黏膜光滑度可预测腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的早期恢复情况。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01682-7.
4
Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阴性患者风险评分模型的建立。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58279-1.
5
Predictors of Long-Term Urinary Incontinence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后长期尿失禁的预测因素
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Aug 21;15:387-393. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S419903. eCollection 2023.
6
Bladder neck size and its association with urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱颈大小及其与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的关系。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Sep 14;4(2):181-186. doi: 10.1002/bco2.188. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
The association between the parameters of uroflowmetry and lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.尿流率参数与机器人辅助前列腺根治术后前列腺癌患者下尿路症状的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 6;17(10):e0275069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275069. eCollection 2022.
8
Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy.术前运动干预以优化根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿效果。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 May;18(5):259-281. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱内前列腺突出可能会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期的控尿功能。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00740-0.
10
Comparison of perioperative outcomes in elderly (age ≧ 75 years) vs. younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.比较年龄≧75 岁的老年男性与年轻男性行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0234113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234113. eCollection 2020.