• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross-sectional study.家庭和学校层面因素在欺凌及网络欺凌中的作用:一项横断面研究
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0907-8.
2
Future Orientation among Students Exposed to School Bullying and Cyberbullying Victimization.遭受校园欺凌和网络欺凌的学生的未来取向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 27;15(4):605. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040605.
3
School Leadership and Cyberbullying-A Multilevel Analysis.学校领导力与网络欺凌——多层次分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 15;14(10):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101226.
4
Breakfast skipping is associated with cyberbullying and school bullying victimization. A school-based cross-sectional study.不吃早餐与网络欺凌和校园欺凌受害情况有关。一项基于学校的横断面研究。
Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Trends in Cyberbullying and School Bullying Victimization in a Regional Census of High School Students, 2006-2012.2006 - 2012年高中生区域普查中的网络欺凌和校园欺凌受害情况趋势
J Sch Health. 2015 Sep;85(9):611-20. doi: 10.1111/josh.12290.
6
Relationships among cyberbullying, school bullying, and mental health in Taiwanese adolescents.台湾青少年网络欺凌、校园欺凌与心理健康的关系。
J Sch Health. 2013 Jun;83(6):454-62. doi: 10.1111/josh.12050.
7
Bullying at School, Cyberbullying, and Loneliness: National Representative Study of Adolescents in Denmark.学校霸凌、网络霸凌与孤独感:丹麦青少年全国代表性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;21(4):414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040414.
8
Prevalence and Correlates of Cyberbullying Perpetration. Findings from a German Representative Student Survey.网络欺凌行为的流行率及其相关因素。来自德国代表性学生调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 6;15(2):274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020274.
9
The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying.网络欺凌和传统欺凌之间的重叠。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(5):483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
Cyberbullying: Risk Factors for Victimization in Rural Schools and the Influence of School Climate.网络欺凌:农村学校受害的风险因素及学校氛围的影响。
Violence Vict. 2024 Oct 14;39(5):555-570. doi: 10.1891/VV-2022-0115.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors and Correlates of School Bullying and Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents: Evidence from a School-Based Cross-Sectional Study.土耳其青少年校园欺凌和网络欺凌的风险因素及相关因素:一项基于学校的横断面研究的证据
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 7;26(2):38859. doi: 10.31083/AP38859. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A Serial Mediation Model of Perceived Social Class and Cyberbullying: The Role of Subjective Vitality in Friendship Relations and Psychological Distress.感知社会阶层与网络欺凌的系列中介模型:主观活力在友谊关系和心理困扰中的作用。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):29-38. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17399.
3
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Construction of Nomogram of School Bullying Suffered by Middle School Students in Beijing in 2022.2022年北京市中学生遭受校园欺凌的影响因素分析及列线图构建
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Dec 14;17:4291-4299. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S495658. eCollection 2024.
4
Family Meals and Social Eating Behavior and Their Association with Disordered Eating among Spanish Adolescents: The EHDLA Study.家庭用餐和社交进食行为及其与西班牙青少年饮食失调的关系:EHDLA 研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 26;16(7):951. doi: 10.3390/nu16070951.
5
Content analysis of cyberbullying coverage in Newspapers- A study from Bengaluru, India.报纸中网络欺凌报道的内容分析——一项来自印度班加罗尔的研究。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(2):456-459. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_47_22. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Less Computer Access: Is It a Risk or a Protective Factor for Cyberbullying and Face-to-Face Bullying Victimization among Adolescents in the United States?较少使用电脑:这对美国青少年遭受网络欺凌和面对面欺凌而言是一种风险还是保护因素?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;13(10):834. doi: 10.3390/bs13100834.
7
Predictors, prevalence, and patterns of cyberbullying among school-going children and adolescents.学龄儿童和青少年网络欺凌的预测因素、患病率及模式。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;65(7):720-728. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_313_23. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
The Effects of Covert Narcissism on Chinese College Students Cyberbullying: The Mediation of Hostile Attribution Bias and the Moderation of Self-Control.隐性自恋对中国大学生网络欺凌的影响:敌意归因偏差的中介作用与自我控制的调节作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jun 27;16:2353-2366. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S416902. eCollection 2023.
9
Psychosocial factors of risk and protection associated with juvenile cyberbullying victimization: results from an international multi-city study (International Self-Report Delinquency Study 3, ISRD3).与青少年网络欺凌受害相关的风险和保护的社会心理因素:一项国际多城市研究(国际自我报告犯罪研究3,ISRD3)的结果
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jun 1;30(3):397-417. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2040395. eCollection 2023.
10
Similarities and Differences between Psychosocial Determinants of Bullying and Cyberbullying Perpetration among Polish Adolescents.波兰青少年实施欺凌和网络欺凌的心理社会决定因素的异同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021358.

本文引用的文献

1
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行本地变革(包容性):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 30;15:381. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-381.
2
Socioeconomic status and bullying: a meta-analysis.社会经济地位与欺凌:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):e48-59. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301960. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
3
Peer victimization during adolescence and risk for anxiety disorders in adulthood: a prospective cohort study.青少年时期的同伴侵害与成年后患焦虑症的风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Jul;31(7):574-82. doi: 10.1002/da.22270. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
4
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.数字时代的欺凌行为:对青少年网络欺凌研究的批判性回顾和元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1073-137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Ethnicity and bullying involvement in a national UK youth sample.英国全国青少年样本中的种族和欺凌涉入情况。
J Adolesc. 2013 Aug;36(4):639-49. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 May 15.
6
Peer victimization in childhood and internalizing problems in adolescence: a prospective longitudinal study.儿童期同伴侵害与青春期内化问题:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;41(2):309-23. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9678-8.
7
Prevalence of bullying and victimization among children in early elementary school: do family and school neighbourhood socioeconomic status matter?小学儿童中欺凌和受欺凌现象的流行率:家庭和学校邻里社会经济地位是否重要?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 2;12:494. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-494.
8
Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study.欺凌受害与青少年早期自我伤害风险:纵向队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2683. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2683.
9
Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence and other anti-social behaviour in adulthood.学校欺凌行为可预测成年后的犯罪、暴力及其他反社会行为。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):99-106. doi: 10.1002/cbm.799.
10
School, neighborhood, and family factors are associated with children's bullying involvement: a nationally representative longitudinal study.学校、邻里和家庭因素与儿童参与欺凌行为有关:一项具有全国代表性的纵向研究。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 May;48(5):545-553. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819cb017.

家庭和学校层面因素在欺凌及网络欺凌中的作用:一项横断面研究

The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Bevilacqua Leonardo, Shackleton Nichola, Hale Daniel, Allen Elizabeth, Bond Lyndal, Christie Deborah, Elbourne Diana, Fitzgerald-Yau Natasha, Fletcher Adam, Jones Rebecca, Miners Alec, Scott Stephen, Wiggins Meg, Bonell Chris, Viner Russell M

机构信息

UCL Institute of Child Health, Population, Policy and Practice Programme, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, London, UK.

UCL Institute of Child Health, Population, Policy and Practice Programme - General and Adolescent Paediatrics Unit, 30 Guilford Street (1st Floor), WC1N 1EH, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0907-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-017-0907-8
PMID:28697725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505024/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bullying and cyberbullying are common phenomena in schools. These negative behaviours can have a significant impact on the health and particularly mental health of those involved in such behaviours, both as victims and as bullies. This UK study aims to investigate student-level and school-level characteristics of those who become involved in bullying and cyberbullying behaviours as victims or perpetrators.

METHODS

We used data from 6667 Year 7 students from the baseline survey of a cluster randomized trial in 40 English schools to investigate the associations between individual-level and school-level variables with bullying victimization, cyberbullying perpetration, and cyberbullying victimization. We ran multilevel models to examine associations of bullying outcomes with individual-level variables and school-level variables.

RESULTS

In multilevel models, at the school level, school type and school quality measures were associated with bullying risk: students in voluntary-aided schools were less likely to report bullying victimization (0.6 (0.4, 0.9) p = 0.008), and those in community (3.9 (1.5, 10.5) p = 0.007) and foundation (4.0 (1.6, 9.9) p = 0.003) schools were more likely to report being perpetrators of cyberbullying than students in mainstream academies. A school quality rating of "Good" was associated with greater reported bullying victimization (1.3 (1.02, 1.5) p = 0.03) compared to ratings of "Outstanding."

CONCLUSIONS

Bullying victimization and cyberbullying prevalence vary across school type and school quality, supporting the hypothesis that organisational/management factors within the school may have an impact on students' behaviour. These findings will inform future longitudinal research investigating which school factors and processes promote or prevent bullying and cyberbullying behaviours.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial ID: ISRCTN10751359 Registered: 11/03/2014 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

欺凌和网络欺凌是学校中的常见现象。这些负面行为会对参与此类行为的人的健康,尤其是心理健康产生重大影响,无论是受害者还是欺凌者。这项英国研究旨在调查那些成为欺凌和网络欺凌行为受害者或实施者的学生层面和学校层面的特征。

方法

我们使用了来自40所英国学校的一项整群随机试验基线调查中的6667名7年级学生的数据,以调查个体层面和学校层面变量与欺凌受害、网络欺凌实施和网络欺凌受害之间的关联。我们运行了多层次模型来检验欺凌结果与个体层面变量和学校层面变量之间的关联。

结果

在多层次模型中,在学校层面,学校类型和学校质量指标与欺凌风险相关:受资助志愿学校的学生报告遭受欺凌的可能性较小(0.6(0.4,0.9),p = 0.008),而社区学校(3.9(1.5,10.5),p = 0.007)和基础学校(4.0(1.6,9.9),p = 0.003)的学生比主流学院的学生更有可能报告实施网络欺凌。与“优秀”评级相比,“良好”的学校质量评级与报告的更多欺凌受害情况相关(1.3(1.02,1.5),p = 0.03)。

结论

欺凌受害和网络欺凌的流行程度因学校类型和学校质量而异,支持了学校内部的组织/管理因素可能对学生行为产生影响这一假设。这些发现将为未来的纵向研究提供信息,该研究将调查哪些学校因素和过程促进或预防欺凌和网络欺凌行为。

试验注册

试验编号:ISRCTN10751359 注册日期:2014年3月11日(追溯注册)