• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五区域假设检验用于暴露-疾病关联分析。

A Five-Region Hypothesis Test for Exposure-Disease Associations.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Research Center for Genes, Environment and Human Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05301-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-05301-4
PMID:28698548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5506070/
Abstract

Characterizing exposure-disease associations is a central issue in epidemiology, one which epidemiologists often approach by adopting the index of the odds ratio and presenting its point estimate, p-value and confidence interval. In this study, the parameter space of the odds ratio is partitioned into five mutually exclusive regions corresponding to 'strong protective factor', 'weak protective factor', 'no association', 'weak risk factor', and 'strong risk factor', respectively. The authors presented a suite of statistical methods tailored to such a five-region demarcation, including methods for hypothesis testing, confidence interval estimation and calculation of the sample size needed to obtain the desired level of statistical power. The authors show that the five-region methods can efficiently and informatively describe a putative exposure-disease association, including its presence or absence, as well as its direction and strength (if any association exists). Three published results were re-analyzed to demonstrate the methods. R code is provided for convenience as well. The five-region methods are recommended for routine use during the analysis of epidemiologic data.

摘要

描述暴露-疾病关联是流行病学中的一个核心问题,为此,流行病学家通常采用比值比指数,并给出其点估计值、p 值和置信区间。在本研究中,将比值比的参数空间划分为五个相互排斥的区域,分别对应“强保护因素”、“弱保护因素”、“无关联”、“弱风险因素”和“强风险因素”。作者提出了一整套针对这种五区域划分的统计方法,包括用于假设检验、置信区间估计和计算获得所需统计功效所需样本量的方法。作者表明,五区域方法可以有效地、有信息量地描述一个假定的暴露-疾病关联,包括其存在与否,以及其方向和强度(如果存在任何关联)。还重新分析了三个已发表的结果以演示这些方法。此外还提供了 R 代码以便于使用。建议在分析流行病学数据时常规使用五区域方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/dbedd78c27dc/41598_2017_5301_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/399c264bc3b0/41598_2017_5301_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/a6f66456c9d6/41598_2017_5301_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/c11da6ded56c/41598_2017_5301_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/dbedd78c27dc/41598_2017_5301_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/399c264bc3b0/41598_2017_5301_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/a6f66456c9d6/41598_2017_5301_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/c11da6ded56c/41598_2017_5301_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c03/5506070/dbedd78c27dc/41598_2017_5301_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Five-Region Hypothesis Test for Exposure-Disease Associations.五区域假设检验用于暴露-疾病关联分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05301-4.
2
Statistical methods in epidemiology: I. Statistical errors in hypothesis testing.流行病学中的统计方法:I. 假设检验中的统计误差。
Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Apr;20(4):121-6. doi: 10.3109/09638289809166071.
3
Implications of statistical power for confidence intervals.统计功效对置信区间的影响。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012 Nov;65(3):427-37. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02035.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
4
Estimating crude or common odds ratios in case-control studies with informatively missing exposure data.
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb 1;155(3):274-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.3.274.
5
Characterizing exposure-disease association in human populations using the Lorenz curve and Gini index.利用洛伦兹曲线和基尼指数描述人群中的暴露-疾病关联。
Stat Med. 1997 Apr 15;16(7):729-39. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<729::aid-sim491>3.0.co;2-a.
6
Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.利用土地利用回归和约束因子分析评估室内和室外空气污染的异质性。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2010 Dec(152):5-80; discussion 81-91.
7
On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond.关于使用四乘二列联表及其他方法估计相加交互作用
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 15;168(2):212-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn104. Epub 2008 May 28.
8
Hypothesis testing (Part I).假设检验(第一部分)。
Natl Med J India. 2000 Mar-Apr;13(2):86-93.
9
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
[Methodological aspects of biostatistics and epidemiology in a clinical trial].[临床试验中生物统计学与流行病学的方法学方面]
P R Health Sci J. 1999 Mar;18(1):23-30.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized, double-blind water taste test to evaluate the equivalence of taste between tap water and filtered water in the Taipei metropolis.一项随机、双盲的水味道测试,旨在评估台北都会区自来水和过滤水之间的味道等效性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70272-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Night work and the risk of cancer among men.夜班工作与男性癌症风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 1;176(9):751-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws318. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
2
Indoor air pollution from coal combustion and the risk of neural tube defects in a rural population in Shanxi Province, China.中国山西省农村地区燃煤导致的室内空气污染与神经管缺陷风险
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug 15;174(4):451-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr108. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
3
Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.三边检验:优效性、等效性和非劣效性同时检验。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 10;29(20):2117-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.4002.
4
Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.基于匹配对设计的优势比的等效性检验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(6):889-901. doi: 10.1080/10543400500265561.
5
Nonfatal cancer preceding Parkinson's disease: a case-control study.帕金森病之前的非致命性癌症:一项病例对照研究。
Epidemiology. 2002 Mar;13(2):157-64. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200203000-00010.
6
A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.两种单侧检验方法与评估平均生物利用度等效性的效能法的比较。
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.