Suppr超能文献

单次远程缺血预处理不能改善急性常压和慢性低压缺氧状态下的血管功能。

One session of remote ischemic preconditioning does not improve vascular function in acute normobaric and chronic hypobaric hypoxia.

作者信息

Rieger Mathew G, Hoiland Ryan L, Tremblay Joshua C, Stembridge Mike, Bain Anthony R, Flück Daniela, Subedi Prajan, Anholm James D, Ainslie Philip N

机构信息

Centre for Heart, Lung and Vascular Health, School of Health and Exercise Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

Cardiff School of Sport, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Exp Physiol. 2017 Sep 1;102(9):1143-1157. doi: 10.1113/EP086441. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

What is the central question of this study? It is suggested that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) might offer protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injuries, but the utility of RIPC in high-altitude settings remains unclear. What is the main finding and its importance? We found that RIPC offers no vascular protection relative to pulmonary artery pressure or peripheral endothelial function during acute, normobaric hypoxia and at high altitude in young, healthy adults. However, peripheral chemosensitivity was heightened 24 h after RIPC at high altitude. Application of repeated short-duration bouts of ischaemia to the limbs, termed remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), is a novel technique that might have protective effects on vascular function during hypoxic exposures. In separate parallel-design studies, at sea level (SL; n = 16) and after 8-12 days at high altitude (HA; n = 12; White Mountain, 3800 m), participants underwent either a sham protocol or one session of four bouts of 5 min of dual-thigh-cuff occlusion with 5 min recovery. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD; ultrasound), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP; echocardiography) and internal carotid artery (ICA) flow (ultrasound) were measured at SL in normoxia and isocapnic hypoxia (end-tidal PO2 maintained at 50 mmHg) and during normal breathing at HA. The hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) was measured at each location. All measures at SL and HA were obtained at baseline (BL) and at 1, 24 and 48 h post-RIPC or sham. At SL, RIPC produced no changes in FMD, PASP, ICA flow, end-tidal gases or HVR in normoxia or hypoxia. At HA, although HVR increased 24 h post-RIPC compared with BL [2.05 ± 1.4 versus 3.21 ± 1.2 l min  (% arterial O saturation) , P < 0.01], there were no significant differences in FMD, PASP, ICA flow and resting end-tidal gases. Accordingly, a single session of RIPC is insufficient to evoke changes in peripheral, pulmonary and cerebral vascular function in healthy adults. Although chemosensitivity might increase after RIPC at HA, this did not confer any vascular changes. The utility of a single RIPC session seems unremarkable during acute and chronic hypoxia.

摘要

本研究的核心问题是什么?有人提出远程缺血预处理(RIPC)可能对缺血再灌注损伤起到保护作用,但RIPC在高海拔环境中的效用仍不明确。主要发现及其重要性是什么?我们发现,在年轻健康成年人处于急性常压缺氧和高海拔状态时,相对于肺动脉压或外周内皮功能而言,RIPC并未提供血管保护作用。然而,在高海拔地区,RIPC后24小时外周化学敏感性增强。对肢体进行反复短时间的缺血处理,即远程缺血预处理(RIPC),是一种新技术,可能在低氧暴露期间对血管功能具有保护作用。在单独的平行设计研究中,在海平面(SL;n = 16)以及在高海拔(HA;n = 12;白山,海拔3800米)停留8 - 12天后,参与者接受了假手术方案或进行一轮四组、每组5分钟的双侧大腿袖带阻断并恢复5分钟的操作。在海平面常氧和等容性缺氧(呼气末PO2维持在50 mmHg)状态下以及在高海拔正常呼吸期间,测量肱动脉血流介导的舒张功能(FMD;超声)、肺动脉收缩压(PASP;超声心动图)和颈内动脉(ICA)血流(超声)。在每个位置测量低氧通气反应(HVR)。在海平面和高海拔地区的所有测量均在基线(BL)以及RIPC或假手术操作后1、24和48小时进行。在海平面,RIPC在常氧或缺氧状态下对FMD、PASP、ICA血流以及呼气末气体或HVR均未产生变化。在高海拔地区,尽管与基线相比,RIPC后24小时HVR增加[2.05±1.4对3.21±1.2升/分钟(%动脉血氧饱和度),P < 0.01],但FMD、PASP、ICA血流和静息呼气末气体方面无显著差异。因此,单次RIPC不足以引起健康成年人外周、肺和脑血管功能的变化。尽管在高海拔地区RIPC后化学敏感性可能增加,但这并未导致任何血管变化。在急性和慢性缺氧期间,单次RIPC的效用似乎并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验