Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理不能预防快速上升至 3450 米后发生的急性高原病。

Remote ischemic preconditioning does not prevent acute mountain sickness after rapid ascent to 3,450 m.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and General Critical Care Medicine, Salzburg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria;

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Nov 1;123(5):1228-1234. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00505.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to protect remote organs, such as the brain and the lung, from damage induced by subsequent hypoxia or ischemia. Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a syndrome of nonspecific neurologic symptoms and in high-altitude pulmonary edema excessive hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) plays a pivotal role. We hypothesized that RIPC protects the brain from AMS and attenuates the magnitude of HPV after rapid ascent to 3,450 m. Forty nonacclimatized volunteers were randomized into two groups. At low altitude (750 m) the RIPC group ( = 20) underwent 4 × 5 min of lower-limb ischemia (induced by inflation of bilateral thigh cuffs to 200 mmHg) followed by 5 min of reperfusion. The control group ( = 20) underwent a sham protocol (4 × 5 min of bilateral thigh cuff inflation to 20 mmHg). Thereafter, participants ascended to 3,450 m by train over 2 h and stayed there for 48 h. AMS was evaluated by the Lake Louise score (LLS) and the AMS-C score. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) was assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. RIPC had no effect on the overall incidence (RIPC: 35%, control: 35%, = 1.0) and severity (RIPC vs.

CONTROL

= 0.496 for LLS; = 0.320 for AMS-C score) of AMS. RIPC also had no significant effect on SPAP [maximum after 10 h at high altitude; RIPC: 33 (SD 8) mmHg; controls: 37 (SD 7) mmHg; = 0.19]. This study indicates that RIPC, performed immediately before passive ascent to 3,450 m, does not attenuate AMS and the magnitude of high-altitude pulmonary hypertension. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been reported to improve neurologic and pulmonary outcome following an acute ischemic or hypoxic insult, yet the effect of RIPC for protecting from high-altitude diseases remains to be determined. The present study shows that RIPC, performed immediately before passive ascent to 3,450 m, does not attenuate acute mountain sickness and the degree of high-altitude pulmonary hypertension. Therefore, RIPC cannot be recommended for prevention of high-altitude diseases.

摘要

目的

远程缺血预处理(RIPC)已被证明可保护大脑等远程器官免受随后缺氧或缺血引起的损伤。急性高原病(AMS)是一种非特异性神经系统症状综合征,在高原性肺水肿中,过度缺氧性肺血管收缩(HPV)起着关键作用。我们假设 RIPC 可保护大脑免受 AMS 影响,并减轻快速上升至 3450 米后 HPV 的程度。

方法

将 40 名未适应的志愿者随机分为两组。在低海拔(750 米)时,RIPC 组(n=20)接受 4×5 分钟的下肢缺血(通过双侧大腿袖带充气至 200mmHg 来诱导),随后进行 5 分钟的再灌注。对照组(n=20)接受假手术方案(4×5 分钟双侧大腿袖带充气至 20mmHg)。此后,参与者乘坐火车在 2 小时内上升至 3450 米,并在那里停留 48 小时。通过 Lake Louise 评分(LLS)和 AMS-C 评分评估 AMS。通过经胸多普勒超声心动图评估收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)。

结果

RIPC 对 AMS 的总发生率(RIPC:35%,对照组:35%,=1.0)和严重程度(RIPC 与对照组相比:LLS 的=0.496;AMS-C 评分的=0.320)均无影响。RIPC 对 SPAP 也没有显著影响[高海拔后 10 小时的最大值;RIPC:33(SD 8)mmHg;对照组:37(SD 7)mmHg;=0.19]。

结论

本研究表明,在被动上升至 3450 米之前立即进行 RIPC,并不能减轻 AMS 和高原性高血压的程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验