• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Distinction of Risk Factors for Superficial vs Organ-Space Surgical Site Infections After Pancreatic Surgery.胰腺手术后浅表性与器官腔隙性手术部位感染危险因素的区分
JAMA Surg. 2017 Nov 1;152(11):1023-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2155.
2
Preoperative chemotherapy and corticosteroids: independent predictors of cranial surgical-site infections.术前化疗和皮质类固醇:颅外科部位感染的独立预测因子。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;125(1):187-95. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142719. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
3
Unique predictors and economic burden of superficial and deep/organ space surgical site infections following pancreatectomy.胰腺切除术后浅表及深部/器官腔隙手术部位感染的独特预测因素及经济负担
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Jul;20(7):658-668. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Risk factors for superficial vs deep/organ-space surgical site infections: implications for quality improvement initiatives.浅表与深部/器官间隙手术部位感染的危险因素:对质量改进措施的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):849-58. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2925.
5
Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.微创手术中的风险最小化:各种腹腔镜子宫切除术类型的手术部位感染率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1370-1376.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
Surgical site infection and risk factors following right lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults: A single-center prospective cohort study.成人右叶活体肝移植术后手术部位感染及危险因素:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;21(6):e13176. doi: 10.1111/tid.13176. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
7
Morbidity associated with 30-day surgical site infection following nonshunt pediatric neurosurgery.非分流小儿神经外科手术后30天手术部位感染相关的发病率
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Apr;19(4):421-427. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.PEDS16455. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
8
[Investigation and factor analysis of postoperative surgical site infections in emergency abdominal surgery in China from 2018 to 2021 based on Chinese SSI Surveillance].基于中国外科手术部位感染监测的2018至2021年中国急诊腹部手术后手术部位感染调查及因素分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):827-836. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230619-00216.
9
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Laparoscopic Colectomy: An NSQIP Database Analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术术后手术部位感染的危险因素:NSQIP 数据库分析。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
10
Impact of Intra-Operative Adverse Events on the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgery.腹部手术中手术不良事件对手术部位感染风险的影响
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Apr;20(3):174-183. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.157. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes fueling surgical site infections: evidence, technical challenges and future directions.细菌易位至肠系膜淋巴结引发手术部位感染:证据、技术挑战及未来方向
J Transl Med. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06462-x.
2
Standard versus Pre-emptive Antibiotic Treatment to Reduce the Rate of Infectious Outcomes after Whipple resection (SPARROW): a study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.标准治疗与预防性抗生素治疗降低Whipple术后感染发生率(SPARROW):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Mar 13;26(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08574-z.
3
Impact of Routine and Selective Preoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with Stent Placement on Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.常规及选择性术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影术并支架置入对胰腺导管腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后及肿瘤学结局的影响
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 1;13(2):333. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020333.
4
Non-Surgical Interventions for the Prevention of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula-A Narrative Review.预防临床相关术后胰瘘的非手术干预措施——一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;15(24):5865. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245865.
5
Comparison of Cefazolin and Ceftriaxone as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pancreatoduodenectomy with Preoperative Drainage: Incidence of Surgical Site Infection and Susceptibility of Bacteria in Bile.头孢唑林与头孢曲松用于术前引流的胰十二指肠切除术的抗菌预防作用比较:手术部位感染发生率和胆汁细菌的药敏性。
World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3298-3307. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07174-3. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.胰十二指肠切除术后延长抗生素预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1458-1466. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad213.
7
The hepatic and pancreatic tumour resection risk factors for surgical site wound infections: A meta-analysis.肝脏和胰腺肿瘤切除术手术部位感染的危险因素:荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3140-3147. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14190. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
The role of preoperative albumin and white blood cell count in surgical site infections following whipple surgery.术前白蛋白和白细胞计数在 Whipple 手术后手术部位感染中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 10;12(1):19184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21849-2.
9
The Costs of Complications and Unplanned Readmissions after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors: Results from a Single Academic Center.胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤后并发症及非计划再入院的费用:来自单一学术中心的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;13(24):6271. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246271.
10
Perioperative and anesthetic risk factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study.胰十二指肠切除术患者手术部位感染的围手术期和麻醉风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240490. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trials to reduce pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery-review of randomized controlled trials.降低胰腺手术后胰瘘发生率的临床试验——随机对照试验综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar 16;1:4. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.19. eCollection 2016.
2
Prior inpatient admission increases the risk of post-operative infection in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.先前的住院治疗会增加肝胆胰手术术后感染的风险。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Dec;17(12):1105-12. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12499. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups.在某些国家医疗安全网络手术分组中,特定手术的手术部位感染发生率差异很大。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jun;43(6):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
4
Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.临床注册与医疗保险索赔数据在外科手术护理质量分类方面的比较。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):290-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000707.
5
Upcoming rules and benchmarks concerning the monitoring of and the payment for surgical infections.
Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;94(6):1219-31. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)在报告胰腺切除患者并发症方面的局限性:强调需要一个胰腺特异性模块。
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2439-1.
7
Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.医疗保健相关感染:对美国医疗保健系统成本和财务影响的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-46. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763.
8
Treatment of bacteriobilia decreases wound infection rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.治疗菌血症可降低胰十二指肠切除术后伤口感染率。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jun;16(6):592-8. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12170. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Perioperative antibiotics for surgical site infection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: does the SCIP-approved regimen provide adequate coverage?胰十二指肠切除术围手术期抗生素用于手术部位感染:SCIP 批准的方案是否提供了足够的覆盖范围?
Surgery. 2013 Aug;154(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination.术后抗菌治疗 5 天可降低有胆汁污染风险的胰十二指肠切除术后感染性并发症的发生率。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jun;15(6):473-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

胰腺手术后浅表性与器官腔隙性手术部位感染危险因素的区分

Distinction of Risk Factors for Superficial vs Organ-Space Surgical Site Infections After Pancreatic Surgery.

作者信息

Elliott Irmina A, Chan Carmen, Russell Tara A, Dann Amanda M, Williams Jennifer L, Damato Lauren, Chung Hallie, Girgis Mark D, Hines O Joe, Reber Howard A, Donahue Timothy R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).

Veterans Affairs Los Angeles Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Nov 1;152(11):1023-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2155.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2155
PMID:28700780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710411/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates are increasingly used as a quality metric. However, risk factors for SSI in pancreatic surgery remain undefined.

OBJECTIVE

To stratify superficial and organ-space SSIs after pancreatectomy and investigate their modifiable risk factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis included 201 patients undergoing pancreatic surgery at a university-based tertiary referral center from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2015, and 10 371 patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Hepatopancreaticobiliary (NSQIP-HPB) Collaborative sites from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Superficial, deep-incisional, and organ-space SSIs, as defined by NSQIP.

RESULTS

Among the 201 patients treated at the single center (108 men [53.7%] and 93 women [46.3%]; median age, 48.6 years [IQR, 41.4-57.3 years]), 58 had any SSI (28.9%); 28 (13.9%), superficial SSI; 8 (4%), deep-incisional SSI; and 24 (11.9%), organ-space SSI. Independent risk factors for superficial SSI were preoperative biliary stenting (odds ratio [OR], 4.81; 95% CI, 1.25-18.56; P = .02) and use of immunosuppressive corticosteroids (OR, 13.42; 95% CI, 1.64-109.72; P = .02), whereas soft gland texture was the only risk factor for organ-space SSI (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.35-14.66; P = .01). Most patients with organ-space infections also had grades B/C fistulae (15 of 24 [62.5%] vs 4 of 143 [2.8%] in patients with no SSI; P < .001). Organ/space but not superficial SSI was associated with an increased rate of sepsis (7 of 24 [29.2%] vs 4 of 143 [2.8%]; P < .001) and prolonged length of hospital stay (12 vs 8 days; P = .04). Among patients in the NSQIP-HPB Collaborative, 2057 (19.8%) had any SSI; 719 (6.9%), superficial SSI; 207 (2%), deep-incisional SSI; and 1287 (12.4%), organ-space SSI. Preoperative biliary stenting was confirmed as an independent risk factor for superficial SSI (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58-2.71; P < .001). In this larger data set, soft gland texture was an independent risk factor for superficial SSI (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85; P = .002) but was more strongly and significantly associated with organ-space SSI (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.88-2.85; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Preoperative biliary stenting and coriticosteroid use increase superficial SSI, even in patients receiving perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam. Additional measures, including extended broad-spectrum perioperative antibiotic treatment, should be considered in these patients. Organ/space SSIs appear to be related to pancreatic fistulae, which are not modifiable. Reporting these different subtypes as a single, overall rate may be misleading.

摘要

重要性

手术部位感染(SSI)率越来越多地被用作质量指标。然而,胰腺手术中SSI的危险因素仍不明确。

目的

对胰腺切除术后的浅表和器官间隙SSI进行分层,并调查其可改变的危险因素。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性分析纳入了2013年7月1日至2015年6月30日在一家大学三级转诊中心接受胰腺手术的201例患者,以及2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日来自国家外科质量改进计划-肝胆胰(NSQIP-HPB)协作点的10371例患者。

主要结局和测量指标

NSQIP定义的浅表、深部切口和器官间隙SSI。

结果

在单中心治疗的201例患者中(108例男性[53.7%]和93例女性[46.3%];中位年龄48.6岁[IQR,41.4 - 57.3岁]),58例发生任何SSI(28.9%);28例(13.9%)为浅表SSI;8例(4%)为深部切口SSI;24例(11.9%)为器官间隙SSI。浅表SSI的独立危险因素为术前胆道支架置入(比值比[OR],4.81;95%可信区间[CI],1.25 - 18.56;P = 0.02)和使用免疫抑制性皮质类固醇(OR,13.42;95% CI,1.64 - 109.72;P = 0.02),而胰腺质地柔软是器官间隙SSI的唯一危险因素(OR,4.45;95% CI,1.35 - 14.66;P = 0.01)。大多数器官间隙感染患者也有B/C级瘘管(无SSI患者中24例中的15例[62.5%] vs 143例中的4例[2.8%];P < 0.001)。器官/间隙而非浅表SSI与脓毒症发生率增加相关(24例中的7例[29.2%] vs 143例中的4例[2.8%];P < 0.001)以及住院时间延长(12天 vs 8天;P = 0.04)。在NSQIP-HPB协作组的患者中,2057例(19.8%)发生任何SSI;719例(6.9%)为浅表SSI;207例(2%)为深部切口SSI;1287例(12.4%)为器官间隙SSI。术前胆道支架置入被确认为浅表SSI的独立危险因素(OR,2.07;95% CI,1.58 - 2.71;P < 0.001)。在这个更大的数据集中,胰腺质地柔软是浅表SSI的独立危险因素(OR,1.45;95% CI,1.14 - 1.85;P = 0.002),但与器官间隙SSI的相关性更强且更显著(OR,2.32;95% CI,1.88 - 2.85;P < 0.001)。

结论及相关性

术前胆道支架置入和皮质类固醇的使用会增加浅表SSI,即使在接受围手术期哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦治疗的患者中也是如此。对于这些患者,应考虑采取额外措施,包括延长围手术期广谱抗生素治疗。器官/间隙SSI似乎与胰腺瘘管有关,而胰腺瘘管不可改变。将这些不同亚型报告为单一的总体发生率可能会产生误导。