1Beef and Sheep Research Centre,Scotland's Rural College,Kings Buildings,West Mains Road,Edinburgh EH9 3JG,UK.
2Beef and Sheep Select,SAC Consulting Ltd,Scotland's Rural College,Kings Buildings,West Mains Road,Edinburgh EH9 3JG,UK.
Animal. 2018 Feb;12(2):280-287. doi: 10.1017/S175173111700146X. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Adding nitrate to or increasing the concentration of lipid in the diet are established strategies for reducing enteric methane (CH4) emissions, but their effectiveness when used in combination has been largely unexplored. This study investigated the effect of dietary nitrate and increased lipid included alone or together on CH4 emissions and performance traits of finishing beef cattle. The experiment was a 2×4 factorial design comprising two breeds (cross-bred Aberdeen Angus (AAx) and cross-bred Limousin (LIMx) steers) and four dietary treatments (each based on 550 g forage : 450 g concentrate/kg dry matter (DM)). The four dietary treatments were assigned according to a 2×2 factorial design where the control treatment contained rapeseed meal as the main protein source, which was replaced either with nitrate (21.5 g nitrate/kg DM); maize distillers dark grains (MDDG, which increased diet ether extract from 24 to 37 g/kg DM) or both nitrate and MDDG. Steers (n=20/dietary treatment) were allocated to each of the four treatments in equal numbers of each breed with feed offered ad libitum. After 28 days adaptation to dietary treatments, individual animal intake, performance and feed efficiency were recorded for 56 days. Thereafter, CH4 emissions were measured over 13 weeks (six steers/week). Increasing dietary lipid did not adversely affect animal performance and showed no interactions with dietary nitrate. In contrast, addition of nitrate to diets resulted in poorer live-weight gain (P<0.01) and increased feed conversion ratio (P<0.05) compared with diets not containing nitrate. Daily CH4 output was lower (P<0.001) on nitrate-containing diets but increasing dietary lipid resulted in only a non-significant reduction in CH4. There were no interactions associated with CH4 emissions between dietary nitrate and lipid. Cross-bred Aberdeen Angus steers achieved greater live-weight gains (P<0.01), but had greater DM intakes (P<0.001), greater fat depth (P<0.01) and poorer residual feed intakes (P<0.01) than LIMx steers. Cross-bred Aberdeen Angus steers had higher daily CH4 outputs (P<0.001) but emitted less CH4 per kilogram DM intake than LIMx steers (P<0.05). In conclusion, inclusion of nitrate reduced CH4 emissions in growing beef cattle although the efficacy of nitrate was less than in previous work. When increased dietary lipid and nitrate inclusion were combined there was no evidence of an interaction between treatments and therefore combining different nutritional treatments to mitigate CH4 emissions could be a useful means of achieving reductions in CH4 while minimising any adverse effects.
添加硝酸盐或增加饮食中的脂质浓度是减少肠道甲烷(CH4)排放的既定策略,但它们联合使用的效果在很大程度上尚未得到探索。本研究调查了单独或联合使用饮食硝酸盐和增加脂质对育肥牛肉牛 CH4 排放和性能特征的影响。该实验是一项 2×4 析因设计,包括两个品种(杂交安格斯牛(AAx)和杂交利木赞牛(LIMx)阉牛)和四种饮食处理(每种处理均基于 550 g 粗饲料:450 g 浓缩物/kg 干物质(DM))。根据 2×2 析因设计分配了这四种饮食处理,其中对照处理以油菜籽粉作为主要蛋白质来源,用硝酸盐(21.5 g 硝酸盐/kg DM);玉米酒糟(MDDG,使饮食醚提取物从 24 增加到 37 g/kg DM)或硝酸盐和 MDDG 替换。将阉牛(n=20/饮食处理)以每个品种的均等数量分配到四个处理中的每个处理中,并自由采食。经过 28 天适应饮食处理后,记录了 56 天个体动物的摄入量、性能和饲料效率。此后,在 13 周内(每周 6 头阉牛)测量 CH4 排放。增加饮食中的脂质不会对动物的性能产生不利影响,并且与饮食中的硝酸盐没有相互作用。相比之下,与不含硝酸盐的饮食相比,在饮食中添加硝酸盐会导致较低的活体重增加(P<0.01)和饲料转化率增加(P<0.05)。含有硝酸盐的饮食的每日 CH4 排放量较低(P<0.001),但增加饮食中的脂质仅导致 CH4 排放量略有减少。硝酸盐和脂质之间与 CH4 排放无关的相互作用。杂交安格斯阉牛的活体重增加更大(P<0.01),但 DM 摄入量更大(P<0.001),脂肪深度更大(P<0.01),剩余饲料摄入量更差(P<0.01)比 LIMx 阉牛。杂交安格斯阉牛的每日 CH4 排放量更高(P<0.001),但每千克 DM 摄入量的 CH4 排放量低于 LIMx 阉牛(P<0.05)。总之,在生长肉牛中添加硝酸盐可减少 CH4 排放,但硝酸盐的功效低于以前的研究。当增加饮食中的脂质和硝酸盐含量相结合时,处理之间没有证据表明存在相互作用,因此结合不同的营养处理来减轻 CH4 排放可能是一种有用的方法,可以在最小化任何不利影响的同时减少 CH4 的排放。