• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院资助的心脏骤停研究:十年趋势分析

National Institutes of Health-Funded Cardiac Arrest Research: A 10-Year Trend Analysis.

作者信息

Coute Ryan A, Panchal Ashish R, Mader Timothy J, Neumar Robert W

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 12;6(7):e005239. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005239.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.116.005239
PMID:28701308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5586273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a leading cause of death in the United States, claiming over 450 000 lives annually. Improving survival depends on the ability to conduct CA research and on the translation and implementation of research findings into practice. Our objective was to provide a descriptive analysis of annual National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for CA research over the past decade.

METHOD AND RESULTS

A search within NIH RePORTER for the years 2007 to 2016 was performed using the terms: "cardiac arrest" or "cardiopulmonary resuscitation" or "heart arrest" or "circulatory arrest" or "pulseless electrical activity" or "ventricular fibrillation" or "resuscitation." Grants were reviewed and categorized as CA research (yes/no) using predefined criteria. The annual NIH funding for CA research, number of individual grants, and principal investigators were tabulated. The total NIH investment in CA research for 2015 was calculated and compared to those for other leading causes of death within the United States. Interrater reliability among 3 independent reviewers for fiscal year 2015 was assessed using Fleiss κ. The search yielded 2763 NIH-funded grants, of which 745 (27.0%) were classified as CA research (κ=0.86 [95%CI 0.80-0.93]). Total inflation-adjusted NIH funding for CA research was $35.4 million in 2007, peaked at $76.7 million in 2010, and has decreased to $28.5 million in 2016. Per annual death, NIH invests ≈$2200 for stroke, ≈$2100 for heart disease, and ≈$91 for CA.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that the annual NIH investment in CA research is low relative to other leading causes of death in the United States and has declined over the past decade.

摘要

背景

心脏骤停(CA)是美国主要的死亡原因之一,每年导致超过45万人死亡。提高生存率取决于开展心脏骤停研究的能力以及将研究结果转化并应用于实践的能力。我们的目标是对美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)在过去十年中每年用于心脏骤停研究的资金进行描述性分析。

方法与结果

在NIH RePORTER中使用以下检索词对2007年至2016年的数据进行检索:“心脏骤停”或“心肺复苏”或“心跳骤停”或“循环骤停”或“无脉电活动”或“心室颤动”或“复苏”。根据预先设定的标准对拨款进行审查并归类为心脏骤停研究(是/否)。统计了NIH每年用于心脏骤停研究的资金、单个拨款的数量以及主要研究者的数量。计算了2015年NIH对心脏骤停研究的总投资,并与美国其他主要死亡原因的投资进行了比较。使用Fleiss κ评估了2015财年3名独立评审员之间的评分者间信度。检索共获得2763项由NIH资助的拨款,其中745项(27.0%)被归类为心脏骤停研究(κ=0.86[95%CI 0.80-0.93])。经通胀调整后,NIH在2007年用于心脏骤停研究的资金为3540万美元,2010年达到峰值7670万美元,2016年降至2850万美元。NIH每年为中风死亡患者投资约2200美元,为心脏病死亡患者投资约2100美元,为心脏骤停死亡患者投资约91美元。

结论

该分析表明,相对于美国其他主要死亡原因,NIH每年对心脏骤停研究的投资较低,且在过去十年中有所下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/43fd6f74041a/JAH3-6-e005239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/011b18bb1a11/JAH3-6-e005239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/af707e76f21a/JAH3-6-e005239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/43fd6f74041a/JAH3-6-e005239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/011b18bb1a11/JAH3-6-e005239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/af707e76f21a/JAH3-6-e005239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce02/5586273/43fd6f74041a/JAH3-6-e005239-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
National Institutes of Health-Funded Cardiac Arrest Research: A 10-Year Trend Analysis.美国国立卫生研究院资助的心脏骤停研究:十年趋势分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 12;6(7):e005239. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005239.
2
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.按学术学位和性别划分的皮肤科研究首席研究员 NIH 资助趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):883-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271.
3
The NIH stimulus--the recovery act and biomedical research.美国国立卫生研究院的刺激措施——《复苏法案》与生物医学研究
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1479-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901819.
4
National Institutes of Health investment into cardiac arrest research: A study for the CARES Surveillance Group.美国国立卫生研究院对心脏骤停研究的投资:CARES 监测组的一项研究。
Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:271-273. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Challenges of NIH funding for young investigators: how the AGA is filling the gap via the AGA research foundation.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对青年研究人员的资助面临的挑战:美国胃肠病学会(AGA)如何通过AGA研究基金会填补这一空白。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jun;146(7):1809-12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.009.
6
The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.美国国立卫生研究院的预算与生物医学研究的未来。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 20;354(16):1665-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068050.
7
A lost generation.迷惘的一代。
Cell. 2006 Jul 14;126(1):9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.022.
8
Comprehensive National Institutes of Health funding analysis of academic cardiac surgeons.综合性国立卫生研究院对学术心脏外科医生的资助分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun;159(6):2326-2335.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.032. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Federal funding of endoscopic research in the United States: 1972-2002.美国内窥镜研究的联邦资金投入:1972 - 2002年。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6):831-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02353-8.
10
National Institutes of Health-Funded Anesthesiology Research and Anesthesiology Physician-Scientists: Trends, Promises, and Concerns.美国国立卫生研究院资助的麻醉学研究与麻醉学医师科学家:趋势、前景与关注。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1761-1766. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004341.

引用本文的文献

1
The California Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (CAL-ROC): A novel collaboration to facilitate the implementation of randomized clinical trials in the prehospital setting.加利福尼亚复苏结果联盟(CAL-ROC):一项旨在促进在院前环境中开展随机临床试验实施的新型合作。
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 28;24:100992. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100992. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
National Institutes of Health Funding of Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Research.美国国立卫生研究院对儿童心脏骤停研究的资助。
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.001.
3
Use of machine learning models to identify National Institutes of Health-funded cardiac arrest research.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
2
Identifying Important Gaps in Randomized Controlled Trials of Adult Cardiac Arrest Treatments: A Systematic Review of the Published Literature.识别成人心脏骤停治疗随机对照试验中的重要差距:对已发表文献的系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):749-756. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002916. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
使用机器学习模型来识别美国国立卫生研究院资助的心脏骤停研究。
Resuscitation. 2025 Mar;208:110545. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110545. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
4
Evaluating the current breadth of randomized control trials on cardiac arrest: A scoping review.评估当前关于心脏骤停的随机对照试验的广度:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Oct 17;5(5):e13334. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13334. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Arrhythmia Research at a Tipping Point: The Need for Disruptive Science and Technology.心律失常研究处于关键转折点:对颠覆性科学技术的需求。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;17(8):e012720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012720. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Evaluating the National Institutes of Health Pipeline for Resuscitation Science Investigators.评估美国国立卫生研究院复苏科学研究人员的研究进程。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):e035854. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035854. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
7
The Public Health and Economic Impact of Drug Overdose Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States.美国院外心脏骤停药物过量的公共卫生与经济影响
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Mar 27:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2327526.
8
Design and implementation of the hospital airway resuscitation trial.医院气道复苏试验的设计与实施
Resusc Plus. 2023 Nov 30;17:100512. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100512. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Resuscitation Plus Special Issue: Cardiac arrest research.《复苏加刊》特刊:心脏骤停研究
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 21;15:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100416. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Mouse Model of Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Revealed Severely Impaired Lymphopoiesis After Resuscitation.发展并评估一种新的窒息性心脏骤停小鼠模型,揭示复苏后严重受损的淋系造血。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e019142. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019142. Epub 2021 May 20.
《2015年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Readmission rates and long-term hospital costs among survivors of an in-hospital cardiac arrest.住院心脏骤停幸存者的再入院率和长期住院费用。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Nov;7(6):889-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000925. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Cardiac arrest: a public health perspective.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;30(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
6
Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States.美国住院患者中心脏骤停治疗的发生率。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2401-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182257459.
7
Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: an opportunity to align research prioritization and public health need.
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18):1876-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.963991. Epub 2010 Oct 17.