• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心电图对肥厚型心肌病和运动员心脏的鉴别诊断的准确性:欧洲心脏病学会(2010 年)和国际(2017 年)标准的比较。

Accuracy of the ECG for differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and athlete's heart: comparison between the European Society of Cardiology (2010) and International (2017) criteria.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Institute of Sports Medicine and Science, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2018 May;52(10):667-673. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097438. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097438
PMID:28701362
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interpretation of the athlete's ECG is based on differentiation between benign ECG changes and potentially pathological abnormalities. The aim of the study was to compare the 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the 2017 International criteria for differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and athlete's heart.

METHODS

The study populations included 200 patients with HCM and 563 athletes grouped as follows: 'group 1', including normal ECG and isolated increase of QRS voltages, which are considered non-pathologic according to ESC and International criteria; 'group 2', including left atrial enlargement or left axis deviation in isolation and Q-waves with an amplitude ≥4 mm but <25% of the ensuing R-wave and a duration <0.04 s which are considered pathologic according to the ESC but not according to the International criteria; and 'group 3', including abnormalities which are considered pathologic according to ESC and International criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, the 2010 ESC criteria showed a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 86.9%. Considering group 2 ECG changes as normal according to the International criteria led to a statistically significant (p<0.001) increase of specificity to 95.9%, associated with a non-significant (p=0.47) reduction of sensitivity to 93%. Among patients with HCM, there was a significant increase of maximal left ventricular wall thickness from group 1 to 3 (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 2017 International criteria is associated with a substantial increase in specificity and a marginal decrease in sensitivity for differential diagnosis between HCM and athlete's heart.

摘要

背景

运动员心电图的解读基于良性心电图改变与潜在病理性异常之间的区分。本研究旨在比较 2010 年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和 2017 年肥厚型心肌病(HCM)与运动员心脏鉴别诊断的国际标准。

方法

研究人群包括 200 例 HCM 患者和 563 例运动员,分为以下三组:“组 1”包括正常心电图和孤立性 QRS 波电压增高,根据 ESC 和国际标准,这些被认为是非病理性的;“组 2”包括孤立性左心房扩大或左轴偏移以及 Q 波幅度≥4mm 但<25%后续 R 波和持续时间<0.04s,根据 ESC 标准被认为是病理性的,但根据国际标准则不是;“组 3”包括根据 ESC 和国际标准被认为是病理性的异常。

结果

总体而言,2010 年 ESC 标准的敏感性为 95.5%,特异性为 86.9%。根据国际标准将组 2 的心电图改变视为正常,特异性显著提高(p<0.001)至 95.9%,敏感性则略有下降(p=0.47)至 93%。在 HCM 患者中,最大左心室壁厚度从组 1 到 3 显著增加(p=0.02)。

结论

使用 2017 年国际标准可显著提高 HCM 与运动员心脏鉴别的特异性,敏感性略有下降。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of the ECG for differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and athlete's heart: comparison between the European Society of Cardiology (2010) and International (2017) criteria.心电图对肥厚型心肌病和运动员心脏的鉴别诊断的准确性:欧洲心脏病学会(2010 年)和国际(2017 年)标准的比较。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 May;52(10):667-673. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097438. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
2
Clinical meaning of isolated increase of QRS voltages in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus athlete's heart.肥厚型心肌病与运动员心脏中QRS电压孤立性升高的临床意义。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart: An electrocardiographic and echocardiographic approach.肥厚型心肌病与运动员心脏的鉴别:心电图和超声心动图方法
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;49(4):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
4
Evolving interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram: from European Society of Cardiology and Stanford criteria, to Seattle criteria and beyond.运动员心电图解读的演变:从欧洲心脏病学会和斯坦福标准,到西雅图标准及其他。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
The multi-modality cardiac imaging approach to the Athlete's heart: an expert consensus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.运动员心脏的多模态心脏成像方法:欧洲心血管影像学会专家共识
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;16(4):353. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu323.
6
Large Q and S waves in lead III on the electrocardiogram distinguish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athletes.心电图Ⅲ导联出现大Q波和S波可将肥厚型心肌病患者与运动员区分开来。
Heart. 2018 Nov;104(22):1871-1877. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312647. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? The athlete's electrocardiogram: time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology.在年轻运动员中,是否应将轴偏或心房扩大归类为异常?运动员的心电图:病理标志物重新评估的时机。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(47):3641-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht390. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
8
Athlete's heart or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?运动员心脏还是肥厚型心肌病?
Clin Res Cardiol. 2009 Feb;98(2):80-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-008-0721-2. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
9
Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elite high school athletes: comparison to adolescent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.优秀高中生运动员的心电图异常:与青少年肥厚型心肌病的比较。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;50(2):105-10. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094880.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of extended-length electrocardiogram in differentiating between athlete's heart and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.延长导联心电图在鉴别运动员心脏与肥厚型心肌病中的诊断准确性
J Electrocardiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Follow-Up of Professional Soccer Players: The Analyses of Left and Right Heart Morphology and Function by Conventional, Three-Dimensional, and Deformation Analyses.职业足球运动员的长期随访:通过传统、三维及变形分析对左右心形态和功能的分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(14):1745. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141745.
2
Austrian consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.奥地利肥厚型心肌病诊断与管理共识声明
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Oct;136(Suppl 15):571-597. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02442-1. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.
国际运动员心电图解读标准:常见误区与未来方向。
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2024 Mar;16(1):35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2023.09.006.
4
Visual or computer-based measurements: Which is important for the interpretation of an athlete's electrocardiography?视觉或基于计算机的测量:对于运动员心电图的解读,哪种更重要?
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Oct 27;69(11):e20230476. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230476. eCollection 2023.
5
Patterns of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.肥厚型心肌病患儿心电图异常模式。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Dec;45(8):1692-1701. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03252-4. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.国际运动员心电图解读标准:常见误区与未来方向。
Cardiol Clin. 2023 Feb;41(1):35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
7
Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Athletes with Premature Ventricular Beats.心脏磁共振成像在评估早搏运动员中的作用。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 14;11(2):426. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020426.
8
A study of the clinical application value of ultrasound and electrocardiogram in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathy.超声心动图与心电图在心肌病鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值研究
Am J Transl Res. 2021 May 15;13(5):5200-5207. eCollection 2021.
9
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Primary Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: Similarities, Differences and Phenocopies.肥厚型心肌病与原发性限制型心肌病:异同与表型模拟
J Clin Med. 2021 May 1;10(9):1954. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091954.
10
Performance of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) 14-Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study.美国心脏协会(AHA)14 点评估与心电图在高中生心血管筛查中的表现比较:一项前瞻性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 16;8(14):e012235. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012235. Epub 2019 Jul 9.