• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉或基于计算机的测量:对于运动员心电图的解读,哪种更重要?

Visual or computer-based measurements: Which is important for the interpretation of an athlete's electrocardiography?

机构信息

Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine - İzmir, Turkey.

Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology - İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Oct 27;69(11):e20230476. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230476. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20230476
PMID:37909616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610756/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Preparticipation screening of athletes by electrocardiography is the most crucial step in determining sudden cardiac death risk factors. Several electrocardiography interpretation software programs have been developed for physicians practicing in this field. Our study aimed to assess cardiopoint sudden death screening module by comparing its findings with two cardiologists using Seattle and International criteria.

METHODS

A total of 303 licensed national athletes (37% females) were enrolled. electrocardiographies were examined by the cardiopoint sudden death screening module using Seattle criteria and cardiologists. The consistency between cardiologists and software was compared, and the confidence assessment of the module was tested.

RESULTS

With regard to Seattle criteria, moderate consistency was found between the cardiopoint sudden death screening module and the 1st (κ=0.41) and 2nd cardiologist (κ=0.59). Consistency between two cardiologists was moderate (κ=0.55). When we applied International criteria, there was moderate consistency between the module and the 1st cardiologist (κ=0.42), and good consistency between the module and the 2nd cardiologist (κ=0.63). Consistency between the two cardiologists was good (κ=0.62).

CONCLUSION

The cardiopoint sudden death screening module had similar agreement with cardiologists based on both criteria. However, the software needs to be updated according to International criteria. Using computer-based measurements for preparticipation screening will help to save time and provide standardization of electrocardiography interpretation.

摘要

目的

运动员的参赛前筛查通过心电图检查是确定心源性猝死风险因素的最关键步骤。已经开发出了几种用于该领域医生的心电图解读软件程序。我们的研究旨在通过比较西雅图和国际标准,评估 cardiopoint 猝死筛查模块与两位心脏病专家的发现。

方法

共纳入 303 名有执照的国家运动员(37%为女性)。使用西雅图标准和心脏病专家对 cardiopoint 猝死筛查模块进行心电图检查。比较了心脏病专家和软件之间的一致性,并测试了模块的置信度评估。

结果

关于西雅图标准,cardiopoint 猝死筛查模块与第 1 位(κ=0.41)和第 2 位心脏病专家之间存在中度一致性。两位心脏病专家之间的一致性为中度(κ=0.55)。当我们应用国际标准时,模块与第 1 位心脏病专家之间存在中度一致性(κ=0.42),与第 2 位心脏病专家之间存在良好一致性(κ=0.63)。两位心脏病专家之间的一致性为良好(κ=0.62)。

结论

该模块根据两个标准与心脏病专家具有相似的一致性。但是,软件需要根据国际标准进行更新。使用基于计算机的测量进行参赛前筛查将有助于节省时间并提供心电图解释的标准化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/10610756/1187519ac518/1806-9282-ramb-69-11-e20230476-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/10610756/3f7c524fcffd/1806-9282-ramb-69-11-e20230476-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/10610756/1187519ac518/1806-9282-ramb-69-11-e20230476-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/10610756/3f7c524fcffd/1806-9282-ramb-69-11-e20230476-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/10610756/1187519ac518/1806-9282-ramb-69-11-e20230476-gf02.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual or computer-based measurements: Which is important for the interpretation of an athlete's electrocardiography?视觉或基于计算机的测量:对于运动员心电图的解读,哪种更重要?
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Oct 27;69(11):e20230476. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230476. eCollection 2023.
2
Inter-Rater Reliability and Downstream Financial Implications of Electrocardiography Screening in Young Athletes.年轻运动员心电图筛查的评分者间信度及下游财务影响
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Aug;10(8):e003306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003306.
3
Criteria for interpretation of the athlete's ECG: A critical appraisal.运动员心电图解读标准:批判性评价。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):882-890. doi: 10.1111/pace.14001. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Sudden cardiac death and preparticipation screening: the debate continues-in support of electrocardiogram-inclusive preparticipation screening.猝死者和参赛前筛查:争论仍在继续——支持包含心电图的参赛前筛查。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(5):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.01.001.
5
Evolving interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram: from European Society of Cardiology and Stanford criteria, to Seattle criteria and beyond.运动员心电图解读的演变:从欧洲心脏病学会和斯坦福标准,到西雅图标准及其他。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.美国全国大学体育协会(NCAA)运动员的心电图解读:“西雅图”标准与“国际”标准的比较
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;56:81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
7
Pediatric athletes' ECG and diagnostic performance of contemporary ECG interpretation criteria.儿科运动员的心电图和当代心电图解读标准的诊断性能。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 15;335:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
Decreased false-positive adolescent pre-athletic screening with Seattle Criteria-interpreted electrocardiograms.采用西雅图标准解读心电图减少青少年运动前筛查的假阳性结果。
Cardiol Young. 2017 Apr;27(3):512-517. doi: 10.1017/S104795111600086X. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
9
Modest agreement in ECG interpretation limits the application of ECG screening in young athletes.心电图解读方面的适度一致性限制了心电图筛查在年轻运动员中的应用。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jan;12(1):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.09.060. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
10
Physician adherence to 'Seattle' and 'International' ECG criteria in adolescent athletes: An analysis of compliance by specialty, experience, and practice environment.医生对青少年运动员“西雅图”和“国际”心电图标准的遵循情况:按专业、经验和执业环境进行的依从性分析。
J Electrocardiol. 2020 May-Jun;60:98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.美国全国大学体育协会(NCAA)运动员的心电图解读:“西雅图”标准与“国际”标准的比较
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;56:81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe.计算机心电图:亦敌亦友。
Am J Med. 2019 Feb;132(2):153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
Large Q and S waves in lead III on the electrocardiogram distinguish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athletes.
心电图Ⅲ导联出现大Q波和S波可将肥厚型心肌病患者与运动员区分开来。
Heart. 2018 Nov;104(22):1871-1877. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312647. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Accuracy of the ECG for differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and athlete's heart: comparison between the European Society of Cardiology (2010) and International (2017) criteria.心电图对肥厚型心肌病和运动员心脏的鉴别诊断的准确性:欧洲心脏病学会(2010 年)和国际(2017 年)标准的比较。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 May;52(10):667-673. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097438. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
Incidence and Etiology of Sudden Cardiac Death: New Updates for Athletic Departments.心脏性猝死的发病率与病因:体育部门的新进展
Sports Health. 2017 May/Jun;9(3):268-279. doi: 10.1177/1941738117694153. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
International criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: Consensus statement.国际运动员心电图解读标准:共识声明。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 May;51(9):704-731. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097331. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
7
Prevalence and incidence of Q-wave unrecognized myocardial infarction in general population: Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram. The REGICOR study.普通人群中Q波未识别心肌梗死的患病率和发病率:心电图的诊断价值。REGICOR研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
Electrocardiography in pre-participation screening and current guidelines for participation in competitive sports.运动前筛查中的心电图检查及当前竞技体育参赛指南
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2016 Jan-Feb;144(1-2):104-10. doi: 10.2298/sarh1602104g.
9
Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? The athlete's electrocardiogram: time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology.在年轻运动员中,是否应将轴偏或心房扩大归类为异常?运动员的心电图:病理标志物重新评估的时机。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(47):3641-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht390. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
10
Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the 'Seattle criteria'.运动员心电图解读:“西雅图标准”。
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;47(3):122-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092067.