• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化与建模行人群体中的协调性与连贯性。

Quantifying and Modeling Coordination and Coherence in Pedestrian Groups.

作者信息

Kiefer Adam W, Rio Kevin, Bonneaud Stéphane, Walton Ashley, Warren William H

机构信息

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, United States.

Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterCincinnati, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00949. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00949
PMID:28701966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5488766/
Abstract

Coherent collective behavior emerges from local interactions between individuals that generate group dynamics. An outstanding question is how to quantify group coordination of non-rhythmic behavior, in order to understand the nature of these dynamics at both a local and global level. We investigate this problem in the context of a small group of four pedestrians walking to a goal, treating their speed, and heading as behavioral variables. To measure the local coordination between pairs of pedestrians, we employ cross-correlation to estimate coupling strength and cross-recurrence quantification (CRQ) analysis to estimate dynamic stability. When compared to reshuffled virtual control groups, the results indicate lower-dimensional behavior and a stronger, more stable coupling of walking speed in real groups. There were no differences in heading alignment observed between the real and virtual groups, due to the common goal. By modeling the local speed coupling, we can simulate coordination at the dyad and group levels. The findings demonstrate spontaneous coordination in pedestrian groups that gives rise to coherent global behavior. They also offer a methodological approach for investigating group dynamics in more complex settings.

摘要

连贯的集体行为源于个体之间的局部相互作用,这种相互作用产生了群体动态。一个突出的问题是如何量化非节律性行为的群体协调性,以便在局部和全局层面理解这些动态的本质。我们在一小群朝着目标行走的四名行人的情境中研究这个问题,将他们的速度和行进方向视为行为变量。为了测量行人对之间的局部协调性,我们采用互相关来估计耦合强度,并采用交叉重现量化(CRQ)分析来估计动态稳定性。与重新排列的虚拟对照组相比,结果表明真实群体中的行为维度更低,行走速度的耦合更强、更稳定。由于有共同目标,真实组和虚拟组在行进方向对齐方面没有观察到差异。通过对局部速度耦合进行建模,我们可以模拟二元组和群体层面的协调性。研究结果表明行人群体中存在自发协调性,这种协调性产生了连贯的全局行为。它们还提供了一种在更复杂环境中研究群体动态的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/20710ae3b87d/fpsyg-08-00949-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/3806e4c7d168/fpsyg-08-00949-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/6ba23c207007/fpsyg-08-00949-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/c5039cb73427/fpsyg-08-00949-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/73bc48c87d2a/fpsyg-08-00949-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/67eda073f4e1/fpsyg-08-00949-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/879bf398acb1/fpsyg-08-00949-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/c61d31886812/fpsyg-08-00949-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/8c1c767be3f5/fpsyg-08-00949-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/3f8f5abdf507/fpsyg-08-00949-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/20710ae3b87d/fpsyg-08-00949-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/3806e4c7d168/fpsyg-08-00949-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/6ba23c207007/fpsyg-08-00949-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/c5039cb73427/fpsyg-08-00949-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/73bc48c87d2a/fpsyg-08-00949-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/67eda073f4e1/fpsyg-08-00949-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/879bf398acb1/fpsyg-08-00949-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/c61d31886812/fpsyg-08-00949-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/8c1c767be3f5/fpsyg-08-00949-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/3f8f5abdf507/fpsyg-08-00949-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/5488766/20710ae3b87d/fpsyg-08-00949-g0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying and Modeling Coordination and Coherence in Pedestrian Groups.量化与建模行人群体中的协调性与连贯性。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00949. eCollection 2017.
2
How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.驾驶员如何超越行人?来自现场测试和自然驾驶数据的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105494. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Properties of pedestrians walking in line. II. Stepping behavior.行人排队行走的特性。II. 步行动作
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Oct;86(4 Pt 2):046111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.046111. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
4
Robust weighted averaging accounts for recruitment into collective motion in human crowds.稳健加权平均解释了人类群体中集体运动的招募情况。
Front Appl Math Stat. 2021 Nov;7. doi: 10.3389/fams.2021.761445. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
5
Intrinsic group behaviour: Dependence of pedestrian dyad dynamics on principal social and personal features.内在群体行为:行人二元组动态对主要社会和个人特征的依赖性。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187253. eCollection 2017.
6
Effects of Switching Behavior for the Attraction on Pedestrian Dynamics.切换行为对行人动力学吸引力的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 28;10(7):e0133668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133668. eCollection 2015.
7
A microscopic simulation model for pedestrian-pedestrian and pedestrian-vehicle interactions at crosswalks.一种用于人行横道上行人与行人以及行人与车辆交互的微观模拟模型。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0180992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180992. eCollection 2017.
8
An accelerated failure time model for investigating pedestrian crossing behavior and waiting times at signalized intersections.用于研究信号交叉口行人和等待时间的加速失效时间模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Sep;82:154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
9
Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.混合交通条件下行人间隙穿越指数建模。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Modeling pedestrian crossing speed profiles considering speed change behavior for the safety assessment of signalized intersections.考虑速度变化行为的行人过街速度剖面建模用于信号交叉口的安全评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:332-342. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Walking paths during collaborative carriages do not follow the simple rules observed in the locomotion of single walking subjects.协作式载人车中的行走路径并不遵循单个人体行走时所遵循的简单规则。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 16;12(1):15585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19853-7.
2
Collective Rhythm as an Emergent Property During Human Social Coordination.集体节奏作为人类社会协调过程中的一种涌现属性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:772262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772262. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Follow the leader: visual control of speed in pedestrian following.跟随领导者:行人跟随中速度的视觉控制
J Vis. 2014 Feb 7;14(2):4. doi: 10.1167/14.2.4.
2
The modelling cycle for collective animal behaviour.群体动物行为的建模周期。
Interface Focus. 2012 Dec 6;2(6):764-73. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0031. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
3
Interpersonal and intrapersonal coordinative modes for joint and single task performance.人际和个体内协调模式在联合和单项任务表现中的应用。
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Oct;31(5):1253-67. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
4
Interpersonal synergies.人际协同效应。
Front Psychol. 2011 Mar 9;2:38. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038. eCollection 2011.
5
Inferring individual rules from collective behavior.从群体行为中推断个体规则。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12576-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001763107. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
6
Scale-free correlations in starling flocks.鸦科鸟群中的无标度相关性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11865-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005766107. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
7
Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study.决定动物群体行为的相互作用取决于拓扑距离而非度量距离:一项实地研究的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1232-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711437105. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
8
The art of conversation is coordination: common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue.对话的艺术在于协调:共同基础以及对话过程中眼神动作的配合。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01914.x.
9
Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target.拦截移动目标的行为动力学。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):303-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0859-6. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
10
Distinguishing the noise and attractor strength of coordinated limb movements using recurrence analysis.使用递归分析区分协调肢体运动的噪声和吸引子强度。
Biol Cybern. 2007 Jan;96(1):59-78. doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0104-6. Epub 2006 Sep 5.