Suppr超能文献

人胚胎干细胞治疗脑血管意外患者的Nutech功能评分与欧洲卒中量表的比较:人胚胎干细胞治疗CVA患者的NFS

Comparison of Nutech Functional Score with European Stroke Scale for Patients with Cerebrovascular Accident Treated with Human Embryonic Stem Cells: NFS for CVA Patients Treated with hESCs.

作者信息

Shroff Geeta

机构信息

Director, Nutech Mediworld, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2017 Jun;9(4):35-43.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stem cell therapy is a promising modality for treatment of patients with chronic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in whom treatment other than physiotherapy or occupational therapy does not address the repair or recovery of the lost function. In this study, the author aimed at evaluating CVA patients treated with human embryonic stem cell (hESC) therapy and comparing their study outcomes with globally accepted European Stroke Scale (ESS) to that with novel scoring system, Nutech functional score (NFS), a 21-point positional and directional scoring system for assessing patients with CVA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CVA were assessed with NFS and ESS before and after hESC therapy. NFS assessed the patients in the direction of 1-5 (bad to good), where 5 was considered as the highest possible grade (HPG). The findings were obtained for the patients who scored HPG, and had shown improvement by at least one grade.

RESULTS

Overall, 66.7% of patients scored HPG level on the NFS scale and about 62.5% of the patients scored HPG according to the ESS scale. Approximately, 52.2% patients showed an improvement of 100% (by at least one grade) on NFS scale. None of the patients showed 100% improvement in the alteration of the score by at least one grade when scored with ESS.

CONCLUSION

NFS and ESS scores show that a large population of CVA patients was benefitted with hESC therapy. NFS was found to give more convincing results than ESS, and overcomes the shortcomings of ESS.

摘要

目的

干细胞疗法是治疗慢性脑血管意外(CVA)患者的一种有前景的方式,对于这类患者,除物理治疗或职业治疗外,其他治疗方法无法解决功能丧失的修复或恢复问题。在本研究中,作者旨在评估接受人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)疗法治疗的CVA患者,并将他们的研究结果与全球公认的欧洲卒中量表(ESS)以及新的评分系统——Nutech功能评分(NFS)进行比较,NFS是一种用于评估CVA患者的21分位置和方向评分系统。

材料与方法

对诊断为CVA的患者在hESC治疗前后进行NFS和ESS评估。NFS从1 - 5级(差到好)对患者进行评估,其中5级被视为最高可能等级(HPG)。对获得HPG评分且至少提高了一个等级的患者进行研究。

结果

总体而言,66.7%的患者在NFS量表上达到HPG水平,约62.5%的患者根据ESS量表达到HPG水平。大约52.2%的患者在NFS量表上显示出100%的改善(至少提高一个等级)。当用ESS评分时,没有患者在分数改变上显示出至少一个等级的100%改善。

结论

NFS和ESS评分表明,大量CVA患者从hESC疗法中受益。发现NFS比ESS能给出更有说服力的结果,并克服了ESS的缺点。

相似文献

7
Pediatric abusive head trauma and stroke.小儿虐待性头部创伤与中风。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Aug;20(2):183-190. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.PEDS16650. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

7
The life and fate of mesenchymal stem cells.间充质干细胞的生活与命运。
Front Immunol. 2014 May 19;5:148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00148. eCollection 2014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验