Luo Ma, Zhang Ling, Jiang Xin Hua, Zhang Wei Dong
Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):263-271. doi: 10.5152/dir.2017.16595.
We aimed to explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-related parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) demonstrate differences that could be used to differentiate and improve diagnostic efficiency.
A total of 27 patients, including 22 with HCC and 5 with FNH, underwent liver 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for routine sequences. They were concurrently examined by IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scanning with 11 different b values (0-800 s/mm2). IVIM-derived parameters, such as pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCtotal), were quantified automatically by post-processing software and compared between HCC and FNH groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then created to predict their diagnostic value.
D* was weak in terms of reproducibility among the other parameters. ADCtotal, D, and D* were significantly lower in the HCC group than in the FNH group, while f did not show a significant difference. ADCtotal and D had the largest area under the curve values (AUC; 0.915 and 0.897, respectively) and similarly high efficacy to differentiate the two conditions.
IVIM provides a new modality to differentiate the HCC and FNH. ADCtotal and D demonstrated outstanding and comparable diagnosing utility.
我们旨在探讨肝细胞癌(HCC)和局灶性结节性增生(FNH)的体素内不相干运动(IVIM)相关参数是否存在差异,这些差异可用于鉴别并提高诊断效率。
总共27例患者,包括22例HCC患者和5例FNH患者,接受了肝脏3.0T磁共振成像的常规序列检查。他们同时接受了IVIM扩散加权成像(DWI)扫描,采用11个不同的b值(0 - 800 s/mm²)。通过后处理软件自动定量IVIM衍生参数,如纯扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)、灌注分数(f)和表观扩散系数(ADCTotal),并在HCC组和FNH组之间进行比较。然后绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以预测其诊断价值。
在其他参数中,D的可重复性较差。HCC组的ADCTotal、D和D显著低于FNH组,而f没有显著差异。ADCTotal和D的曲线下面积值最大(AUC分别为0.915和0.897),在鉴别这两种情况方面具有相似的高效性。
IVIM为鉴别HCC和FNH提供了一种新的方法。ADCTotal和D表现出出色且相当的诊断效用。