• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和中国书籍中集体主义与腐败的关系:历史视角

Relationship between collectivism and corruption in American and Chinese books: A historical perspective.

作者信息

Li Yongshuai, Tan Xuyun, Huang Zhenwei, Liu Li

机构信息

Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Psychol. 2019 Apr;54(2):180-187. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12447. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1002/ijop.12447
PMID:28703329
Abstract

Previous research on the relationship between collectivism and corruption has not investigated their co-variation over time. In this study, we use Google Ngram Viewer to track the frequency of words related to collectivism and corruption in American books (1800-2000) and in Chinese Books (1970-2008). The results demonstrate that a positive association between the usage of these terms during the periods in both Chinese and American books, with changes in words related to collectivism preceding changes in words related to corruption in American books. The theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

摘要

先前关于集体主义与腐败之间关系的研究尚未考察它们随时间的共同变化情况。在本研究中,我们使用谷歌图书词频统计器来追踪美国书籍(1800 - 2000年)和中国书籍(1970 - 2008年)中与集体主义和腐败相关词汇的出现频率。结果表明,中美两国书籍在这些时期内这些词汇的使用之间存在正相关关系,且在美国书籍中,与集体主义相关词汇的变化先于与腐败相关词汇的变化。我们还讨论了其理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Relationship between collectivism and corruption in American and Chinese books: A historical perspective.美国和中国书籍中集体主义与腐败的关系:历史视角
Int J Psychol. 2019 Apr;54(2):180-187. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12447. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Historical time in the age of big data: Cultural psychology, historical change, and the Google Books Ngram Viewer.大数据时代的历史时间:文化心理学、历史变迁与谷歌图书Ngram Viewer
Hist Psychol. 2016 May;19(2):141-153. doi: 10.1037/hop0000023.
3
Culture Change and Affectionate Communication in China and the United States: Evidence From Google Digitized Books 1960-2008.中美两国的文化变迁与深情交流:来自谷歌数字化图书(1960 - 2008年)的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 May 22;10:1110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01110. eCollection 2019.
4
Walking the straight and narrow: the moderating effect of evaluation apprehension on the relationship between collectivism and corruption.走正道:评价忧虑对集体主义与腐败关系的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0123859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123859. eCollection 2015.
5
Not all cultural values are created equal: Cultural change in China reexamined through Google books.并非所有文化价值观都是平等的:通过谷歌图书重新审视中国的文化变迁
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):144-154. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12436. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China: using the Google Ngram Viewer to study implications of social and political change for cultural values.中国过去40年的文化演变:利用谷歌Ngram Viewer研究社会和政治变革对文化价值观的影响
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):47-55. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12125. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Transition to market economy promotes individualistic values: Analysing changes in frequencies of Russian words from 1980 to 2008.向市场经济转型促进个人主义价值观:分析1980年至2008年俄语词汇频率的变化。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):23-32. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12411. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Understanding medical corruption in China: a mixed-methods study.理解中国的医疗腐败:一项混合方法研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):496-508. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad015.
9
Increasing digitalization is associated with anxiety and depression: A Google Ngram analysis.数字化程度的提高与焦虑和抑郁有关:谷歌 N gram 分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0284091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284091. eCollection 2023.
10
Increases in individualistic words and phrases in American books, 1960-2008.1960-2008 年美国书籍中个人主义词汇和短语的使用频次增加。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040181. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Guideline for improving the reliability of Google Ngram studies: Evidence from religious terms.提高 Google Ngram 研究可靠性的指南:宗教术语的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213554. eCollection 2019.