Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Personal Ment Health. 2017 Nov;11(4):299-313. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1388. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
The current research evaluated the continuity between DSM-5 Section II and Section III diagnostic operationalizations of avoidant personality disorder (AvPD). More specifically, the study had three aims: (1) to examine which personality constructs comprise the optimal trait constellation for AvPD; (2) to investigate the utility of the proposed structure of the Section III AvPD diagnosis, in regard to combining functional impairment (criterion A) and a dimensional measure of personality (criterion B) variables; and (3) to determine whether AvPD-specific impairment confers incremental meaningful contribution above and beyond general impairment in personality functioning. A mixed sample of 402 university and community participants was recruited, and they were administered multiple measures of Section II PD, personality traits, and personality impairment. A latent measurement model approach was used to analyse data. Results supported the general continuity between Section II and Section III of the DSM-5; however, three of the four main criterion B traits were the stronger predictors. There was also some support for the trait unassertiveness augmenting the criterion B trait profile. The combination of using functional impairment criteria (criterion A) and dimensional personality constructs (criterion B) in operationalizing AvPD was supported; however, the reliance of disorder-specific over general impairment for criterion A was not supported. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
当前的研究评估了 DSM-5 第二部分和第三部分回避型人格障碍(AvPD)诊断操作性定义之间的连续性。更具体地说,该研究有三个目的:(1)检查哪些人格结构构成了 AvPD 的最佳特质组合;(2)研究第三部分 AvPD 诊断提出的结构在结合功能障碍(标准 A)和人格的维度测量(标准 B)变量方面的效用;(3)确定特定的 AvPD 损害是否在人格功能的一般损害之上提供了额外的、有意义的贡献。招募了一个由 402 名大学和社区参与者组成的混合样本,并对他们进行了第二部分 PD、人格特质和人格障碍的多项测量。使用潜在测量模型方法分析数据。结果支持 DSM-5 第二部分和第三部分之间的一般连续性;然而,四个主要标准 B 特征中的三个是更强的预测因素。特质不自信增强标准 B 特征特征的说法也得到了一些支持。在操作性定义 AvPD 中使用功能障碍标准(标准 A)和维度人格结构(标准 B)的组合得到了支持;然而,标准 A 对特定障碍的依赖而不是一般障碍的依赖没有得到支持。版权所有©2017 约翰威立父子公司