Department of Research and Innovation, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital.
National Advisory Unit for Personality Psychiatry, Section for Personality Psychiatry and Specialized Treatments, Department for National and Regional Functions, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital.
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):412-417. doi: 10.1037/per0000553.
This review aims at examining the continuity between the categorical model for personality disorders (PDs) as defined by Section II of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) with respect to Section II avoidant personality disorder (AvPD). Because the Criterion A of the AMPD, that is, the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), is a prerequisite for a PD diagnosis, only studies assessing the LPFS were included, whether or not the Criterion B, that is, pathological personality traits, were assessed as well. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 6 studies comprising community/undergraduate samples and 7 studies comprising clinical samples. Weighted correlation between global LPFS and AvPD was .39 (rw = .55 for community/undergraduate studies; rw =.17 for clinical studies). When AvPD-specific impairment was evaluated, that is, impairment of personality functioning characterizing AvPD in the AMPD, correlations were substantially larger. In studies using regression analyses, the Criterion B appeared to have incremental utility in predicting the presence of Section II AvPD. To capture Section II AvPD in a sufficient degree by the AMPD, it might be necessary to use an AvPD-specific impairment questionnaire. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇综述旨在考察《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二编中人格障碍(PD)的分类模型与人格障碍的替代模型(AMPD)之间的连续性,特别是第二编回避型人格障碍(AvPD)。因为 AMPD 的标准 A,即人格功能水平量表(LPFS),是 PD 诊断的前提条件,所以只纳入了评估 LPFS 的研究,无论是否评估了标准 B,即病理性人格特质。共有 13 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 6 项研究为社区/大学生样本,7 项研究为临床样本。全球 LPFS 和 AvPD 的加权相关系数为.39(社区/大学生研究的 rw =.55;临床研究的 rw =.17)。当评估特定于 AvPD 的障碍,即 AMPD 中特征性的 AvPD 人格功能障碍时,相关性要大得多。在使用回归分析的研究中,标准 B 似乎在预测第二编 AvPD 的存在方面具有增量效用。为了用 AMPD 充分捕捉第二编的 AvPD,可能需要使用特定于 AvPD 的障碍问卷。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。