Suppr超能文献

大麻保护性行为策略量表:使用项目反应理论的进一步检验。

The Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Scale: Further examination using item response theory.

作者信息

Pedersen Eric R, Huang Wenjing, Dvorak Robert D, Prince Mark A, Hummer Justin F

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation.

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):548-559. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Abstract

Given recent state legislation legalizing marijuana for recreational purposes and majority popular opinion favoring these laws, we developed the Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana scale (PBSM) to identify strategies that may mitigate the harms related to marijuana use among those young people who choose to use the drug. In the current study, we expand on the initial exploratory study of the PBSM to further validate the measure with a large and geographically diverse sample (N = 2,117; 60% women, 30% non-White) of college students from 11 different universities across the United States. We sought to develop a psychometrically sound item bank for the PBSM and to create a short assessment form that minimizes respondent burden and time. Quantitative item analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with item response theory (IRT) and evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF), revealed an item bank of 36 items that was examined for unidimensionality and good content coverage, as well as a short form of 17 items that is free of bias in terms of gender (men vs. women), race (White vs. non-White), ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic), and recreational marijuana use legal status (state recreational marijuana was legal for 25.5% of participants). We also provide a scoring table for easy transformation from sum scores to IRT scale scores. The PBSM item bank and short form associated strongly and negatively with past month marijuana use and consequences. The measure may be useful to researchers and clinicians conducting intervention and prevention programs with young adults. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

鉴于近期州立法将娱乐用大麻合法化且多数公众舆论支持这些法律,我们开发了大麻保护行为策略量表(PBSM),以确定可能减轻那些选择使用大麻的年轻人中与大麻使用相关危害的策略。在当前研究中,我们扩展了对PBSM的初步探索性研究,以使用来自美国11所不同大学的大学生的大型且地域多样的样本(N = 2117;60%为女性,30%为非白人)进一步验证该量表。我们试图为PBSM开发一个心理测量学上合理的项目库,并创建一个能将受访者负担和时间降至最低的简短评估形式。定量项目分析,包括使用项目反应理论(IRT)进行探索性和验证性因素分析以及差异项目功能(DIF)评估,揭示了一个由36个项目组成的项目库,该项目库经过了单维度性和良好内容覆盖性检查,以及一个由17个项目组成的简短形式,该形式在性别(男性与女性)、种族(白人与非白人)、族裔(西班牙裔与非西班牙裔)和娱乐用大麻使用法律地位(25.5%的参与者所在州娱乐用大麻合法)方面没有偏差。我们还提供了一个评分表,便于从总分转换为IRT量表分数。PBSM项目库和简短形式与过去一个月的大麻使用及后果呈强烈负相关。该量表可能对针对年轻人开展干预和预防项目的研究人员和临床医生有用。(PsycINFO数据库记录

相似文献

1
The Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Scale: Further examination using item response theory.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):548-559. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Measuring Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Use Among Young Adults.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 May;77(3):441-50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.441.
3
4
Interactions of protective behavioral strategies and cannabis use motives: An online survey among past-month users.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247387. eCollection 2021.
6
Perceived Importance of Marijuana to the College Experience Scale (PIMCES): Initial Development and Validation.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):319-324. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.319.
7
Post-traumatic stress and marijuana outcomes: The mediating role of marijuana protective behavioral strategies.
Subst Abus. 2020;41(3):375-381. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1635965. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Factor analysis of a short form of the Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana scale.
Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106852. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
A dimensional approach to understanding severity estimates and risk correlates of marijuana abuse and dependence in adults.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Jun;21(2):117-33. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1354. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
10
Correlates of Marijuana Drugged Driving and Openness to Driving While High: Evidence from Colorado and Washington.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0146853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146853. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

4
Opioid Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale (OPBSS): Development and psychometric evaluation.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Feb;33(1):100-108. doi: 10.1037/pha0000738. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
Effects of medical cannabis use on physical and psychiatric symptoms across the day among older adults.
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Sep;339:116055. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116055. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
7
Meaningfully Characterizing Cannabis Use for Research and Clinical Settings: A Comprehensive Review of Existing Measures and Proposed Future Directions.
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Mar 1;34(1):82-93. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2024.23645. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Direct and Indirect Effects of Cannabis Risk Perceptions on Cannabis Use Frequency.
Addict Res Theory. 2024;32(1):68-73. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2221029. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

2
College student marijuana involvement: Perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses.
Addict Behav. 2017 Mar;66:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Marijuana use and use disorders in adults in the USA, 2002-14: analysis of annual cross-sectional surveys.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;3(10):954-964. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30208-5. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Measuring Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Use Among Young Adults.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 May;77(3):441-50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.441.
6
Medical marijuana programs - Why might they matter for public health and why should we better understand their impacts?
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Jan 2;2:53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.12.006. eCollection 2015.
7
Chronic adolescent marijuana use as a risk factor for physical and mental health problems in young adult men.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):552-63. doi: 10.1037/adb0000103. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2015;313(24):2456-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6358.
9
Examining the efficacy of a brief group protective behavioral strategies skills training alcohol intervention with college women.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1041-51. doi: 10.1037/a0038173. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验