• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能:对大麻相关结果的独立和交互影响。

Marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy: Independent and interactive effects on marijuana-related outcomes.

机构信息

Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, & Addictions.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;33(4):412-419. doi: 10.1037/adb0000445. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000445
PMID:30869920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6554061/
Abstract

Separately, research has identified use of marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy to be protective factors associated with less marijuana use and associated harms. To date, these factors have not been examined together. Using a large sample of college students recruited from 10 U.S. universities ( = 1,123), we examined the extent to which use of marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy have redundant, independent, or interactive effects on a wide range of marijuana-related outcomes using cross-sectional data. Across 9 marijuana-related outcomes, we found 1 significant buffering interaction (length of typical intoxication), 1 significant synergistic interaction (peak subjective intoxication), and 7 nonsignificant interactions (past month frequency, typical frequency, typical quantity, typical subjective intoxication, frequency of peak intoxication, negative consequences, and cannabis use disorder symptoms). Despite variability across distinct outcomes, on 8 of 9 of these outcomes, we found that individuals who reported high use of marijuana protective behavioral strategies and high levels of marijuana refusal self-efficacy demonstrated the lowest rates of marijuana use/harms. Our findings suggest that both of these factors are promising intervention targets, and future studies should examine distinct intervention strategies to modify use of marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

此外,研究已经确定大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能感是与较少大麻使用和相关危害相关的保护因素。迄今为止,这些因素尚未一起进行检查。使用从美国 10 所大学招募的大量大学生样本(n=1123),我们使用横截面数据检查了大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能感对广泛的大麻相关结果的冗余、独立或交互作用的程度。在 9 种与大麻相关的结果中,我们发现了 1 个显著的缓冲交互作用(典型陶醉的持续时间),1 个显著的协同交互作用(峰值主观陶醉)和 7 个非显著交互作用(过去一个月的频率、典型频率、典型数量、典型主观陶醉、峰值陶醉频率、负面后果和大麻使用障碍症状)。尽管在不同的结果中存在差异,但在这 9 个结果中的 8 个中,我们发现报告大量使用大麻保护性行为策略和高水平大麻拒绝自我效能感的个体表现出最低的大麻使用/危害率。我们的研究结果表明,这两个因素都是有前途的干预目标,未来的研究应该检查不同的干预策略,以改变大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能感。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy: Independent and interactive effects on marijuana-related outcomes.大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能:对大麻相关结果的独立和交互影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;33(4):412-419. doi: 10.1037/adb0000445. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Marijuana protective behavioral strategies as a moderator of the effects of risk/protective factors on marijuana-related outcomes.大麻保护性行为策略作为风险/保护因素对大麻相关结果影响的调节因素。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;69:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
3
Marijuana eCHECKUPTO GO: Effects of a personalized feedback plus protective behavioral strategies intervention for heavy marijuana-using college students.大麻电子测试(eCHECKUPTO GO):对大量吸食大麻的大学生进行个性化反馈加保护性行为策略干预的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
4
The Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Scale: Further examination using item response theory.大麻保护性行为策略量表:使用项目反应理论的进一步检验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):548-559. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
Can I Use Marijuana Safely? An Examination of Distal Antecedents, Marijuana Protective Behavioral Strategies, and Marijuana Outcomes.我可以安全使用大麻吗?对远端前因、大麻保护性行为策略和大麻使用结果的考察。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):203-212. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.203.
6
Social norms and self-efficacy among heavy using adolescent marijuana smokers.青少年重度吸食大麻者的社会规范和自我效能感。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):727-32. doi: 10.1037/a0024958. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
7
Regulate yourself: Emotion regulation and protective behavioral strategies in substance use behaviors.自我调节:物质使用行为中的情绪调节和保护性行为策略。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Is marijuana identity associated with marijuana use and consequences? An examination of direct and interactive associations.大麻身份与大麻使用和后果有关吗?对直接和交互关联的检验。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(8):1286-1296. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1573835. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Life goal appraisal and marijuana use among college students.大学生的人生目标评价与大麻使用。
Addict Behav. 2012 Jul;37(7):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
10
Protective behavioral strategies and alcohol-related outcomes: The moderating effects of drinking refusal self-efficacy and sex.保护性行为策略与酒精相关结果:饮酒拒绝效能感和性别因素的调节作用。
Addict Behav. 2019 Dec;99:106110. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106110. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mobile App (Joint Effort) to Support Cannabis Use Self-Management and Reinforce the Use of Protective Behavioral Strategies: Development Process and Usability Testing.一款支持大麻使用自我管理并强化保护性行为策略应用的移动应用(联合项目):开发过程与可用性测试
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 23;9:e71924. doi: 10.2196/71924.
2
Protective Behavioral Strategies for Psychedelic Use: A Mini Review of the Evidence.迷幻药使用的保护性行为策略:证据综述
Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 2;2(4):234-242. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2023.0052. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Beyond Frequency and Quantity of Cannabis Consumption Among College Students: Context of Using Cannabis Relates to Cannabis-Related Outcomes.大学生吸食大麻的频率和数量之外:大麻使用的背景与大麻相关后果有关。
Cannabis. 2025 Feb 1;8(1):65-80. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000225. eCollection 2025.
4
Multilevel associations of peer cognitive factors and adolescent cannabis use in a legal recreational cannabis region.合法娱乐用大麻地区同伴认知因素与青少年大麻使用的多层次关联
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;15:1477000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1477000. eCollection 2024.
5
Opioid Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale (OPBSS): Development and psychometric evaluation.阿片类药物保护行为策略量表(OPBSS):编制与心理测量学评估
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Feb;33(1):100-108. doi: 10.1037/pha0000738. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
Examination of Rumination's Mediating Role in the Relation Between Distal Personality Predictors, Cannabis Coping Motives, and Negative Cannabis-Related Consequences.探究反刍思维在远端人格预测因素、大麻应对动机与大麻相关负面后果之间关系中的中介作用。
Cannabis. 2024 Feb 23;6(4):82-98. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000172. eCollection 2024.
7
Knowledge, Attitude, and Expectancies Related to Cannabis Use: A Cross-sectional Community Study Among College Students from Bangalore, Karnataka.与大麻使用相关的知识、态度和期望:一项针对卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔大学生的横断面社区研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 May;46(3):221-227. doi: 10.1177/02537176231210681. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
8
A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.大麻负面使用后果的风险与保护因素的范围综述
Subst Abuse. 2023 Apr 7;17:11782218231166622. doi: 10.1177/11782218231166622. eCollection 2023.
9
A qualitative examination of positive and negative consequences young adults experience from simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.对年轻人同时使用酒精和大麻所带来的积极和消极后果的定性研究。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Jun;37(4):639-650. doi: 10.1037/adb0000886. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
10
A comparison of cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across cultures and sex.不同文化和性别人群中大麻保护行为策略的比较。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106966. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
College student mental health: An evaluation of the DSM-5 self-rated Level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure.大学生心理健康:DSM-5 自我评定 1 级跨切症状测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Oct;30(10):1382-1389. doi: 10.1037/pas0000628. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
The Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Scale: Further examination using item response theory.大麻保护性行为策略量表:使用项目反应理论的进一步检验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):548-559. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Moderators of the Effects of Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies: Three Attempts of Replication and Extension.
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jun 7;52(7):939-949. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1267222. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
Can I Use Marijuana Safely? An Examination of Distal Antecedents, Marijuana Protective Behavioral Strategies, and Marijuana Outcomes.我可以安全使用大麻吗?对远端前因、大麻保护性行为策略和大麻使用结果的考察。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):203-212. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.203.
5
Marijuana protective behavioral strategies as a moderator of the effects of risk/protective factors on marijuana-related outcomes.大麻保护性行为策略作为风险/保护因素对大麻相关结果影响的调节因素。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;69:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
6
Social cognitive predictors of treatment outcome in cannabis dependence.大麻依赖治疗结果的社会认知预测因素
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jan 1;170:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
7
Measuring Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Use Among Young Adults.测量年轻成年人中使用大麻的保护性行为策略。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 May;77(3):441-50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.441.
8
The relationship between cannabis outcome expectancies and cannabis refusal self-efficacy in a treatment population.治疗人群中大麻预期结果与大麻拒绝自我效能之间的关系。
Addiction. 2014 Jan;109(1):111-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12366. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
9
Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.大学生使用酒精保护性行为策略:批判性评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Dec;33(8):1025-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
10
Protective behavioral strategies for reducing alcohol involvement: a review of the methodological issues.减少酒精涉入的保护行为策略:方法学问题的回顾。
Addict Behav. 2013 Jul;38(7):2343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 22.