de Boer S W, Heinen Sgh, van den Heuvel Daf, van de Vosse F N, de Vries Jppm
1 Department of Interventional Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Vascular. 2017 Dec;25(6):598-608. doi: 10.1177/1708538117700751. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Purpose The goal of the study was to review current literature regarding the diagnosis of equivocal (50-70%) iliofemoral artery stenosis and compare these findings with the daily practice of an international panel of endovascular experts. Methods The Medline Database was searched for relevant publications, and an electronic survey was sent to experts in the field covering the following topics: definition of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis, angiographic visualization and investigation protocols of an equivocal stenosis, intra-arterial pressure measurements, and definition of hemodynamic significance of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis using a physiologic measure. Results Of the 37 invited endovascular experts, 21 (53.8%) agreed to participate in the survey. Analysis of existing literature shows that the level of evidence for diagnosing equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis is mediocre and is not being implemented by experts in the field. Conclusion Studies have shown that a stenosis of between 50% and 70% iliofemoral lumen diameter reduction shows a wide range of trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis can best be identified using three-dimensional quantitative vascular analysis software. Although evidence for a clear hemodynamic cutoff point is weak, performing trans-lesion intra-arterial pressure measurements at rest and during maximal hyperemia is preferred. Diagnosing iliofemoral artery stenosis solely on lumen diameter reduction is inadequate.
目的 本研究的目的是回顾关于模棱两可(50 - 70%)的髂股动脉狭窄诊断的当前文献,并将这些结果与国际血管内专家小组的日常实践进行比较。方法 在Medline数据库中搜索相关出版物,并向该领域的专家发送电子调查问卷,涵盖以下主题:模棱两可的髂股动脉狭窄的定义、模棱两可狭窄的血管造影可视化和检查方案、动脉内压力测量,以及使用生理测量方法定义模棱两可的髂股动脉狭窄的血流动力学意义。结果 在37位受邀的血管内专家中,21位(53.8%)同意参与调查。对现有文献的分析表明,诊断模棱两可的髂股动脉狭窄的证据水平一般,且该领域的专家并未采用。结论 研究表明,髂股管腔直径减少50%至70%的狭窄显示出广泛的跨狭窄压力梯度。使用三维定量血管分析软件能够最好地识别模棱两可的髂股动脉狭窄。尽管明确的血流动力学临界点的证据不足,但在静息状态和最大充血时进行跨病变动脉内压力测量是首选方法。仅根据管腔直径减少来诊断髂股动脉狭窄是不够的。