Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore.
International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Asia Regional Office, Pham van Dong Road, Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 12;3(7):e1602602. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602602. eCollection 2017 Jul.
Global sustainability strategies require assessing whether countries' development trajectories are sustainable over time. However, sustainability assessments are limited because losses of natural capital and its ecosystem services through deforestation have not been comprehensively incorporated into national accounts. We update the national accounts of 80 nations that underwent tropical deforestation from 2000 to 2012 and evaluate their development trajectories using weak and strong sustainability criteria. Weak sustainability requires that countries do not decrease their aggregate capital over time. We adopt a strong sustainability criterion that countries do not decrease the value of their forest ecosystem services with respect to the year 2000. We identify several groups of countries: countries, such as Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and India, that present sustainable development trajectories under both weak and strong sustainability criteria; countries, such as Brazil, Peru, and Indonesia, that present weak sustainable development but fail the strong sustainability criterion as a result of rapid losses of ecosystem services; countries, such as Madagascar, Laos, and Papua New Guinea, that present unsustainable development pathways as a result of deforestation; and countries, such as Democratic Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone, in which deforestation aggravates already unsustainable pathways. Our results reveal a large number of countries where tropical deforestation is both damaging to nature and not compensated by development in other sectors, thus compromising the well-being of their future generations.
全球可持续性战略需要评估各国的发展轨迹是否具有可持续性。然而,可持续性评估受到限制,因为通过森林砍伐导致的自然资本及其生态系统服务的损失尚未被全面纳入国民账户。我们更新了 2000 年至 2012 年经历热带森林砍伐的 80 个国家的国民账户,并使用弱可持续性和强可持续性标准评估了它们的发展轨迹。弱可持续性要求各国的总资本不随时间减少。我们采用了一个强可持续性标准,即各国的森林生态系统服务的价值相对于 2000 年不减少。我们确定了几类国家:斯里兰卡、孟加拉国和印度等国在弱可持续性和强可持续性标准下均呈现出可持续发展轨迹;巴西、秘鲁和印度尼西亚等国虽然在弱可持续性方面表现良好,但由于生态系统服务的快速损失而未能达到强可持续性标准;马达加斯加、老挝和巴布亚新几内亚等国由于森林砍伐而呈现出不可持续的发展路径;刚果民主共和国和塞拉利昂等国的森林砍伐加剧了本已不可持续的发展路径。我们的研究结果揭示了大量国家的情况,这些国家的热带森林砍伐既对自然造成了破坏,又没有通过其他部门的发展得到补偿,从而危及子孙后代的福祉。