Angelsen Arild, Jagger Pamela, Babigumira Ronnie, Belcher Brian, Hogarth Nicholas J, Bauch Simone, Börner Jan, Smith-Hall Carsten, Wunder Sven
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
World Dev. 2014 Dec;64(Suppl 1):S12-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
This paper presents results from a comparative analysis of environmental income from approximately 8000 households in 24 developing countries collected by research partners in CIFOR's Poverty Environment Network (PEN). Environmental income accounts for 28% of total household income, 77% of which comes from natural forests. Environmental income shares are higher for low-income households, but differences across income quintiles are less pronounced than previously thought. The poor rely more heavily on subsistence products such as wood fuels and wild foods, and on products harvested from natural areas other than forests. In absolute terms environmental income is approximately five times higher in the highest income quintile, compared to the two lowest quintiles.
本文展示了对由国际林业研究中心贫困与环境网络(PEN)的研究伙伴收集的24个发展中国家约8000户家庭的环境收入进行比较分析的结果。环境收入占家庭总收入的28%,其中77%来自天然林。低收入家庭的环境收入份额更高,但不同收入五分位数之间的差异不如之前认为的那么明显。穷人更依赖木材燃料和野生食物等自给产品,以及从森林以外的自然区域收获的产品。从绝对值来看,最高收入五分位数的环境收入大约是最低两个五分位数的五倍。