Suppr超能文献

[更新:急性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭]

[Update: acute hypercapnic respiratory failure].

作者信息

Seiler F, Trudzinski F C, Kredel M, Lotz C, Lepper P M, Muellenbach R M

机构信息

Klinik für Innere Medizin V - Pneumologie, Allergologie, Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.

ECLS Center Saar, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Apr;114(3):234-239. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0318-5. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypercapnic respiratory failure is a frequent problem in critical care and mainly affects patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In recent years, the usage of extracorporeal CO removal (ECCOR) has been increasing.

OBJECTIVE

Summarizing the state of the art in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure with special regard to the role of ECCOR.

METHODS

Review based on a selective literature search and the clinical and scientific experience of the authors.

RESULTS

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the therapy of choice in hypercapnic respiratory failure due to AECOPD, enabling stabilization in the majority of cases and generally improving prognosis. Patients in whom NIV fails have an increased mortality. In these patients, ECCOR may be sufficient to avoid intubation or to shorten time on invasive ventilation; however, corresponding evidence is sparse or even missing when it comes to hard endpoints. Lung-protective ventilation according to the ARDS network is the standard therapy of ARDS. In severe ARDS, low tidal volume ventilation may result in critical hypercapnia. ECCOR facilitates compensation of respiratory acidosis even under "ultra-protective" ventilator settings. Yet, no positive prognostic effects could be demonstrated so far.

CONCLUSION

Optimized use of NIV and lung-protective ventilation remains standard of care in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure. Currently, ECCOR has to be considered an experimental approach, which should only be provided by experienced centers or in the context of clinical trials.

摘要

背景

高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭是重症监护中的常见问题,主要影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者。近年来,体外二氧化碳清除(ECCOR)的应用不断增加。

目的

总结高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭管理的最新进展,特别关注ECCOR的作用。

方法

基于选择性文献检索以及作者的临床和科学经验进行综述。

结果

无创通气(NIV)是AECOPD所致高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭的首选治疗方法,在大多数情况下可实现病情稳定并总体改善预后。NIV治疗失败的患者死亡率增加。对于这些患者,ECCOR可能足以避免插管或缩短有创通气时间;然而,在硬终点方面相应的证据稀少甚至缺乏。根据ARDS网络的肺保护性通气是ARDS的标准治疗方法。在重度ARDS中,低潮气量通气可能导致严重的高碳酸血症。即使在“超保护性”通气设置下,ECCOR也有助于代偿呼吸性酸中毒。然而,目前尚未证明其有积极的预后效果。

结论

优化使用NIV和肺保护性通气仍然是高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭管理的标准治疗方法。目前,ECCOR必须被视为一种实验性方法,仅应由经验丰富的中心提供或在临床试验背景下使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验