Sardella Gennaro, Stella Pieter, Chiarito Mauro, Leone Antonio M, Balian Vruyr, Prosperi Franco, Sorropago Giovanni, Mancone Massimo, Calcagno Simone, Briguori Carlo, Stefanini Giulio G
Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrologic, Anesthesiologic and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):884-891. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27187. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remain at higher risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention despite the use of contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent (AES) has shown promising results in DM patients. Whether this holds true irrespective of patient's clinical and angiographic complexity is unknown.
Five hundred and ninety five consecutive patients (738 lesions) undergoing AES implantation were included in the INVESTIG8 multicenter registry. Patients were stratified according to DM status and further stratified according to patients' complexity. The prespecified primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF)-defined as the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
DM patients were more often complex as compared to non-DM patients (70% vs. 61%, P = 0.015). At 18-month follow-up, there was a trend to a higher TLF rate in DM than in non-DM patients (6.9% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.063). This was largely driven by a markedly higher risk of TLF among complex DM patients as compared to simple DM patients (8.9% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.053). A multivariate analysis identified complexity (HR 6.11, 95% CI: 1.42-26.2) but not DM (HR 1.59; 95% CI 0.71-3.56) as an independent predictor of TLF. Of note, TLR rates were similar between DM and non-DM patients (3.3% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.228).
In this real-world, multicenter registry the Cre8 AES showed favorable clinical outcomes in DM patients. Increased risk of TLF appears to be driven by patients' complexity rather than DM status. These findings will need to be confirmed in a large-scale randomized trial.
尽管使用了当代药物洗脱支架,但糖尿病(DM)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再狭窄风险仍较高。Cre8安普利近洗脱支架(AES)在DM患者中已显示出有前景的结果。无论患者的临床和血管造影复杂性如何,情况是否如此尚不清楚。
INVESTIG8多中心注册研究纳入了595例连续接受AES植入的患者(738处病变)。患者根据DM状态进行分层,并根据患者的复杂性进一步分层。预先设定的主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF),定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建(TLR)的复合终点。
与非DM患者相比,DM患者更常为复杂患者(70%对61%,P = 0.015)。在18个月的随访中,DM患者的TLF率有高于非DM患者的趋势(6.9%对3.5%,P = 0.063)。这在很大程度上是由复杂DM患者中TLF风险明显高于简单DM患者所驱动的(8.9%对2.4%,P = 0.053)。多变量分析确定复杂性(HR 6.11,95%CI:1.42 - 26.2)而非DM(HR 1.59;95%CI 0.71 - 3.56)是TLF的独立预测因素。值得注意的是,DM和非DM患者的TLR率相似(3.3%对1.9%,P = 0.228)。
在这项真实世界的多中心注册研究中,Cre8 AES在DM患者中显示出良好的临床结果。TLF风险增加似乎是由患者的复杂性而非DM状态驱动的。这些发现需要在大规模随机试验中得到证实。