Karatasakis Aris, Brilakis Harilaos S, Danek Barbara A, Karacsonyi Judit, Martinez-Parachini Jose Roberto, Nguyen-Trong Phuong-Khanh J, Alame Aya J, Roesle Michele K, Rangan Bavana V, Rosenfield Kenneth, Mehran Roxana, Mahmud Ehtisham, Chambers Charles E, Banerjee Subhash, Brilakis Emmanouil S
Department of Cardiology, VA North Texas Healthcare System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Cosmos Eye Center, Athens, Greece.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):647-654. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27173. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
To examine the relationship between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the prevalence of lens changes in interventional cardiologists (ICs) and catheterization laboratory ("cath-lab") staff.
Exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with the development of lens opacities. ICs and cath-lab staff can receive high doses of ionizing radiation without protection, and may thus be at risk for lens opacity formation.
We conducted a cross-sectional study at an interventional cardiology conference. Study participants completed a questionnaire pertaining to occupational exposure to radiation and potential confounders for the development of cataracts, followed by slit-lamp examination and grading of lens findings.
A total of 117 attendees participated in the study, including 99 (85%; 49 ± 11 years-old; 82% male) with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and 18 (15%; 39 ± 12 years-old; 61% male) unexposed controls. The prevalence of overall cortical and posterior subcapsular lens changes (including subclinical findings) was higher in exposed participants compared with controls (47 vs. 17%, P = 0.015). Occupational exposure and age over 60 were independent predictors of lens changes (odds ratio [95% CI]: 6.07 [1.38-43.45] and 7.72 [1.60-43.34], respectively). The prevalence of frank opacities was low and similar between the two groups (14 vs. 6%, P = 0.461). Most lens findings consisted of subclinical changes in the periphery of the lens without impact on visual acuity.
Compared with unexposed controls, ICs and cath-lab staff had a higher prevalence of lens changes that may be attributable to ionizing radiation exposure. While most of these changes were subclinical, they are important due to the potential to progress to clinical symptoms, highlighting the importance of minimizing staff radiation exposure.
研究介入心脏病专家(IC)和心导管实验室(“导管室”)工作人员职业性接触电离辐射与晶状体改变患病率之间的关系。
接触电离辐射与晶状体混浊的发生有关。IC和导管室工作人员在无防护的情况下可接受高剂量电离辐射,因此可能有发生晶状体混浊的风险。
我们在一次介入心脏病学会议上进行了一项横断面研究。研究参与者完成了一份关于职业性辐射暴露及白内障发生潜在混杂因素的问卷,随后进行裂隙灯检查并对晶状体检查结果进行分级。
共有117名与会者参与了研究,其中99名(85%;年龄49±11岁;男性82%)有职业性电离辐射暴露,18名(15%;年龄39±12岁;男性61%)为未暴露对照组。与对照组相比,暴露参与者中总体皮质和后囊下晶状体改变(包括亚临床改变)的患病率更高(47%对17%,P = 0.015)。职业性暴露和60岁以上年龄是晶状体改变的独立预测因素(优势比[95%置信区间]:分别为6.07[1.38 - 43.45]和7.72[1.60 - 43.34])。明显混浊的患病率较低,两组相似(14%对6%,P = 0.461)。大多数晶状体检查结果为晶状体周边的亚临床改变,未影响视力。
与未暴露对照组相比,IC和导管室工作人员晶状体改变的患病率更高,这可能归因于电离辐射暴露。虽然这些改变大多为亚临床改变,但由于有可能进展为临床症状,所以很重要,这突出了尽量减少工作人员辐射暴露的重要性。