Böckers Anja, Grab Claudia, Waller Christiane, Schulze Ulrike, Gerhardt-Szep Susanne, Mayer Benjamin, Böckers Tobias Maria, Öchsner Wolfgang
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Faculty, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Office of the Dean of Studies, Medical Faculty, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):50-59. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_338_15.
Gender medicine has gained importance over the past 20 years. Nevertheless, the scientific findings concerning gender- and sex-specific patient care have not been sufficiently integrated into the education of physicians. It was therefore our aim, against initial resistance in our school, to integrate clinically relevant aspects of gender medicine into the existing medical curriculum. This paper describes the implementation process of a lecture-based interdisciplinary, longitudinal, basic gender curriculum and evaluates students' attitudes in relation to sex and semester level.
The curriculum encompasses 15 lecture sessions scheduled in years 1 through 5 of the medical curriculum at Ulm University, Germany. Prospectively gathered evaluation data of two cross-sectional analyses of this basic curriculum in the first and fifth semesters are analyzed by sex.
More than 80% of the students have registered for this new curriculum. Evaluation data show a predominantly positive (75.5%) student response; however, only about half of those surveyed indicated that they had learned new material or judged the content on gender to be relevant to their practice of medicine. Students at a more advanced semester level (88.2% vs. 55.2%) and male participants more than female participants (36.7% vs. 62.4%) showed lower acceptance.
It was possible to integrate gender issues into the existing medical student curriculum. Despite the overall positive rating, our evaluation data identified the aspects of rejection and resistance in some students, particularly male and more advanced students. Further studies on the development of student attitudes toward gender issues are needed.
在过去20年里,性别医学变得越发重要。然而,有关针对不同性别患者护理的科学研究结果尚未充分融入医生的教育之中。因此,尽管我校最初存在阻力,我们的目标仍是将性别医学的临床相关内容融入现有的医学课程。本文描述了一个基于讲座的跨学科、纵向基础性别课程的实施过程,并评估了学生对性别和学期水平的态度。
该课程包括德国乌尔姆大学医学课程第1年至第5年安排的15次讲座。对该基础课程在第一学期和第五学期的两次横断面分析中前瞻性收集的评估数据按性别进行分析。
超过80%的学生报名参加了这一新课程。评估数据显示学生的反应总体呈积极(75.5%);然而,只有约一半的受访者表示他们学到了新内容,或认为性别相关内容与他们的医学实践相关。处于较高学期水平的学生(88.2%对55.2%)和男性参与者比女性参与者(36.7%对62.4%)表现出更低的接受度。
将性别问题融入现有的医学生课程是可行的。尽管总体评价积极,但我们的评估数据发现一些学生,特别是男性和高年级学生存在拒绝和抵触的情况。需要进一步研究学生对性别问题态度的发展。