Suppr超能文献

轮班工作、长时间工作与痴呆症的后期风险:哥本哈根男性研究的长期随访

Shift work, long working hours, and later risk of dementia: A long-term follow-up of the Copenhagen Male Study.

作者信息

Nabe-Nielsen Kirsten, Garde Anne Helene, Ishtiak-Ahmed Kazi, Gyntelberg Finn, Mortensen Erik Lykke, Phung Thien Kieu Thi, Rod Naja Hulvej, Waldemar Gunhild, Westendorp Rudi Gj, Hansen Åse Marie

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail:

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Nov 1;43(6):569-577. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3660. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of shift work and long working hours in midlife on the risk of dementia in old age. Methods The present study comprised 4766 participants from the Copenhagen Male Study. We used information on shift work (collected in 1970-1971 and 1985-1986), long working hours defined as >45 hours per week (collected in 1970-1971), socioeconomic status, sleep, stress, and cardiovascular risk factors. Information about dementia diagnoses was obtained from registers. Participants were followed until 2014 (mean length of follow-up was 17.8 years). We employed Poisson regression for the survival analyses and estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We found no statistically significant association between shift work (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70-1.05) or long working hours (IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79-1.19) and dementia. Adjustment for potential confounders and mediators did not change the estimates. Working shifts at both time points of exposure assessment was not associated with a higher incidence of dementia compared with non-shift workers at both time points (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.42). The lowest incidence of dementia was observed among participants who reported shift work at one time point (only in 1985-1986: IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.16-1.23 and only in 1970-1971: IRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.31-1.11). Conclusion We did not find positive evidence of an association between shift work or long working hours and the incidence of dementia, but the negative findings may reflect the crude assessment of shift work and long working hours, which is a major limitation of the present study.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在调查中年时期的轮班工作和长时间工作对老年痴呆症风险的影响。方法 本研究纳入了哥本哈根男性研究中的4766名参与者。我们使用了关于轮班工作(收集于1970 - 1971年和1985 - 1986年)、每周工作时长超过45小时的长时间工作(收集于1970 - 1971年)、社会经济地位、睡眠、压力和心血管危险因素的信息。痴呆症诊断信息来自登记册。对参与者进行随访直至2014年(平均随访时长为17.8年)。我们采用泊松回归进行生存分析,并估计发病率比(IRR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。结果 我们发现轮班工作(IRR 0.86,95% CI 0.70 - 1.05)或长时间工作(IRR 0.97,95% CI 0.79 - 1.19)与痴呆症之间无统计学显著关联。对潜在混杂因素和中介因素进行调整后,估计值未发生变化。与在两个时间点均不从事轮班工作的人员相比,在暴露评估的两个时间点均从事轮班工作与痴呆症的较高发病率无关(IRR 0.99,95% CI 0.69 - 1.42)。在仅在一个时间点报告从事轮班工作的参与者中观察到痴呆症发病率最低(仅在1985 - 1986年:IRR 0.44,95% CI 0.16 - 1.23;仅在1970 - 1971年:IRR 0.58,95% CI 0.31 - 1.11)。结论 我们未发现轮班工作或长时间工作与痴呆症发病率之间存在关联的阳性证据,但这些阴性结果可能反映了对轮班工作和长时间工作的粗略评估,这是本研究的一个主要局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验