Waniewski Jacek, Antosiewicz Stefan, Baczynski Daniel, Poleszczuk Jan, Pietribiasi Mauro, Lindholm Bengt, Wankowicz Zofia
Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw - Poland.
Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw - Poland.
Int J Artif Organs. 2017 Oct 27;40(11):595-601. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000622. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Sequential peritoneal equilibration test (sPET) is based on the consecutive performance of the peritoneal equilibration test (PET, 4-hour, glucose 2.27%) and the mini-PET (1-hour, glucose 3.86%), and the estimation of peritoneal transport parameters with the 2-pore model. It enables the assessment of the functional transport barrier for fluid and small solutes. The objective of this study was to check whether the estimated model parameters can serve as better and earlier indicators of the changes in the peritoneal transport characteristics than directly measured transport indices that depend on several transport processes.
17 patients were examined using sPET twice with the interval of about 8 months (230 ± 60 days).
There was no difference between the observational parameters measured in the 2 examinations. The indices for solute transport, but not net UF, were well correlated between the examinations. Among the estimated parameters, a significant decrease between the 2 examinations was found only for hydraulic permeability LpS, and osmotic conductance for glucose, whereas the other parameters remained unchanged. These fluid transport parameters did not correlate with D/P for creatinine, although the decrease in LpS values between the examinations was observed mostly for patients with low D/P for creatinine.
We conclude that changes in fluid transport parameters, hydraulic permeability and osmotic conductance for glucose, as assessed by the pore model, may precede the changes in small solute transport. The systematic assessment of fluid transport status needs specific clinical and mathematical tools beside the standard PET tests.
序贯腹膜平衡试验(sPET)基于连续进行腹膜平衡试验(PET,4小时,葡萄糖2.27%)和微型PET(1小时,葡萄糖3.86%),并采用双孔模型估算腹膜转运参数。它能够评估液体和小分子溶质的功能性转运屏障。本研究的目的是检验与依赖多种转运过程的直接测量的转运指标相比,估算的模型参数是否能作为腹膜转运特性变化的更好且更早的指标。
对17例患者进行两次sPET检查,间隔约8个月(230±60天)。
两次检查所测观察参数无差异。两次检查之间溶质转运指标(而非净超滤量)具有良好的相关性。在估算参数中,两次检查之间仅发现水通透性LpS和葡萄糖渗透传导率显著下降,而其他参数保持不变。这些液体转运参数与肌酐的D/P不相关,尽管检查之间LpS值的下降主要见于肌酐D/P较低的患者。
我们得出结论,通过孔模型评估的液体转运参数、水通透性和葡萄糖渗透传导率的变化可能先于小分子溶质转运的变化。除了标准的PET检查外,液体转运状态的系统评估还需要特定的临床和数学工具。