Yu Shu-Juan, Shan Wen-Ling, Liu Yu-Xiao, Huang Xiao-Yan, Zhu Guo-Xiong
Department of Stomatology, the General Hospital of Jinan Military Region of PLA, Jinan, China.
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Oct;43(5):337-344. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00116. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
This study aimed to identify the preferred crown material by measuring the peri-implant clinical parameters and the concentrations of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and calcium in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) with 4 different crown materials. A total of 196 patients with a single missing posterior tooth received crown restoration with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM; n = 50), aurum platinum (Au-Pt) PFM (n = 48), titanium (Ti) PFM (n = 52), or zirconia (Zi) all-ceramic crown (n = 46). Fifty-one natural counterpart teeth served as controls. Before and 12 months after restoration, the PICF was collected, and the concentrations of RANKL, OPG, and calcium were quantified. The peri-implant clinical parameters (plaque index, bleeding on probing, and probing depth [PD]) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volumes were assessed. Twelve months after restoration, the PD and GCF volumes for the 4 experimental groups were significantly greater than those for the control group and before restoration. The Co-Cr group showed the greatest PD, GCF volume, RANKL/OPG, RANKL, and calcium ion concentration, followed by the Au-Pt group. The Ti group had the highest OPG concentration, followed by the Zi group. The RANKL and calcium ion concentrations of the Ti and Zi groups were the smallest. The Ti group had the smallest RANKL/OPG ratio, followed by the Zi group. Different crown materials differentially affected the PD, volume, RANKL/OPG ratio, OPG, RANKL, and calcium concentration. Among the 4 tested crown materials, Zi and Ti are preferred. However, some limitations of the present study should be considered.
本研究旨在通过测量种植体周围临床参数以及采用4种不同牙冠材料时种植体周围龈沟液(PICF)中核因子κB受体活化因子配体(RANKL)、骨保护素(OPG)和钙的浓度,来确定首选的牙冠材料。共有196例单颗后牙缺失患者接受了钴铬(Co-Cr)烤瓷熔附金属(PFM;n = 50)、金铂(Au-Pt)PFM(n = 48)、钛(Ti)PFM(n = 52)或氧化锆(Zi)全瓷牙冠(n = 46)修复。51颗天然对照牙作为对照。在修复前和修复后12个月,收集PICF,并对RANKL、OPG和钙的浓度进行定量分析。评估种植体周围临床参数(菌斑指数、探诊出血和探诊深度[PD])以及龈沟液(GCF)量。修复后12个月,4个试验组的PD和GCF量均显著高于对照组和修复前。Co-Cr组的PD、GCF量、RANKL/OPG、RANKL和钙离子浓度最高,其次是Au-Pt组。Ti组的OPG浓度最高,其次是Zi组。Ti组和Zi组的RANKL和钙离子浓度最小。Ti组的RANKL/OPG比值最小,其次是Zi组。不同的牙冠材料对PD、量、RANKL/OPG比值、OPG、RANKL和钙浓度有不同影响。在4种测试牙冠材料中,Zi和Ti是首选。然而,本研究存在一些局限性,应予以考虑。