Louw-du Toit Renate, Perkins Meghan S, Hapgood Janet P, Africander Donita
Department of Biochemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Sep 9;491(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.07.063. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
Progestins used in endocrine therapies bind to multiple steroid receptors and are associated with several side-effects. It is thus important to understand the relationship between steroid receptor cross-reactivity and the side-effect profile of progestins. In cell lines that express negligible levels of steroid receptors, we report for the first time the binding affinities, potencies and efficacies of selected progestins from different generations determined in parallel. We show that the progestins bind to the androgen receptor (AR) with similar affinities to each other and progesterone, while none bind estrogen receptor (ER)-β, and only norethisterone acetate, levonorgestrel and gestodene bind ERα. Comparative dose-response analysis revealed that progestins from the first three generations display similar androgenic activity to the natural androgen dihydrotestosterone for transactivation, while norethisterone acetate, levonorgestrel and gestodene are ERα agonists. We show for the first time that the anti-androgenic properties of progesterone and drospirenone are similar to the well-known AR antagonist hydroxyflutamide, while nomegestrol acetate is more potent and nestorone less potent than both hydroxyflutamide and progesterone. Moreover, we are the first to report that the older progestins, unlike progesterone and the fourth generation progestins, are efficacious ERα agonists for transrepression, while the selected progestins from the second and third generation are efficacious AR agonists for transrepression. Considering the progestin potencies and their reported free serum concentrations relative to dihydrotestosterone and estradiol, our results suggest that the progestins are likely to exert AR-, but not ERα- or ERβ-mediated effects in vivo.
内分泌治疗中使用的孕激素与多种甾体受体结合,并伴有多种副作用。因此,了解甾体受体交叉反应性与孕激素副作用之间的关系非常重要。在表达极低水平甾体受体的细胞系中,我们首次平行测定了不同代别所选孕激素的结合亲和力、效能和效力。我们发现,这些孕激素与雄激素受体(AR)的结合亲和力彼此相似,且与孕酮相似,而无一与雌激素受体(ER)-β结合,只有醋酸炔诺酮、左炔诺孕酮和孕二烯酮与ERα结合。比较剂量反应分析表明,前三代孕激素在反式激活方面表现出与天然雄激素双氢睾酮相似的雄激素活性,而醋酸炔诺酮、左炔诺孕酮和孕二烯酮是ERα激动剂。我们首次表明,孕酮和屈螺酮的抗雄激素特性与著名的AR拮抗剂氟他胺相似,而醋酸诺美孕酮比氟他胺和孕酮都更有效,而孕三烯酮则效力较低。此外,我们首次报告,与孕酮和第四代孕激素不同,较老的孕激素是有效的ERα反式抑制激动剂,而第二代和第三代所选孕激素是有效的AR反式抑制激动剂。考虑到孕激素的效力及其相对于双氢睾酮和雌二醇报告的游离血清浓度,我们的结果表明,孕激素在体内可能发挥AR介导的作用,但不是ERα或ERβ介导的作用。