Chen Youdinghuan, Marotti Jonathan D, Jenson Erik G, Onega Tracy L, Johnson Kevin C, Christensen Brock C
Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA; Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Exp Mol Pathol. 2017 Aug;103(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
The utility and reliability of assessing molecular biomarkers for translational applications on pre-operative core biopsy specimens assume consistency of molecular profiles with larger surgical specimens. Whether DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), measured in core biopsy and surgical specimens are similar, remains unclear. Here, we compared genome-scale DNA methylation measured in matched core biopsy and surgical specimens from DCIS, including specific DNA methylation biomarkers of subsequent invasive cancer. DNA was extracted from guided 2mm cores of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens, bisulfite-modified, and measured on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. DNA methylation profiles of core biopsies exhibited high concordance with matched surgical specimens. Within-subject variability in DNA methylation was significantly lower than between-subject variability (all P<2.20E-16). In 641 CpGs whose methylation was related with increased hazard of invasive breast cancer, lower within-subject than between-subject variability was observed in 92.3% of the study participants (P<0.05). Between patient-matched core biopsy and surgical specimens, <0.6% of CpGs measured had changes in median DNA methylation >15%, and a pathway analysis of these CpGs indicated enrichment for genes related with wound healing. Our results indicate that DNA methylation measured in core biopsies are representative of the matched surgical specimens and suggest that DCIS biomarkers measured in core biopsies can inform clinical decision-making.
评估术前粗针活检标本中分子生物标志物用于转化应用的实用性和可靠性,假定分子谱与更大的手术标本一致。在粗针活检和手术标本中测量的导管原位癌(DCIS)中的DNA甲基化是否相似,仍不清楚。在这里,我们比较了在DCIS匹配的粗针活检和手术标本中测量的全基因组DNA甲基化,包括后续浸润性癌的特定DNA甲基化生物标志物。从福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)标本的2mm引导芯中提取DNA,进行亚硫酸氢盐修饰,并在Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip上进行测量。粗针活检的DNA甲基化谱与匹配的手术标本表现出高度一致性。DNA甲基化的受试者内变异性显著低于受试者间变异性(所有P<2.20E-16)。在641个甲基化与浸润性乳腺癌风险增加相关的CpG中,92.3%的研究参与者观察到受试者内变异性低于受试者间变异性(P<0.05)。在患者匹配的粗针活检和手术标本之间,测量的CpG中<0.6%的中位DNA甲基化变化>15%,对这些CpG的通路分析表明与伤口愈合相关的基因富集。我们的结果表明,在粗针活检中测量的DNA甲基化代表了匹配的手术标本,并表明在粗针活检中测量的DCIS生物标志物可以为临床决策提供信息。