• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进行为神经科学的透明度和可重复性:发表重复研究、注册报告和阴性结果。

Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results.

作者信息

Baxter Mark G, Burwell Rebecca D

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug;131(4):275-276. doi: 10.1037/bne0000207.

DOI:10.1037/bne0000207
PMID:28714713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6102714/
Abstract

The editors of Behavioral Neuroscience have been discussing several recent developments in the landscape of scientific publishing. The discussion was prompted, in part, by reported issues of reproducibility and concerns about the integrity of the scientific literature. Although enhanced rigor and transparency in science are certainly important, a related issue is that increased competition and focus on novel findings has impeded the extent to which the scientific process is cumulative. We have decided to join the growing number of journals that are adopting new reviewing and publishing practices to address these problems. In addition to our standard research articles, we are pleased to announce 3 new categories of articles: replications, registered reports, and null results. In joining other journals in psychology and related fields to offer these publication types, we hope to promote higher standards of methodological rigor in our science. This will ensure that our discoveries are based on sound evidence and that they provide a durable foundation for future progress. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

《行为神经科学》的编辑们一直在讨论科学出版领域最近的几项发展。部分讨论是由报道的可重复性问题以及对科学文献完整性的担忧引发的。虽然提高科学的严谨性和透明度固然重要,但一个相关问题是,竞争加剧和对新发现的关注阻碍了科学进程的累积程度。我们决定加入越来越多采用新的评审和出版实践来解决这些问题的期刊行列。除了我们的标准研究文章外,我们很高兴地宣布新增三类文章:重复研究、注册报告和阴性结果。通过与心理学及相关领域的其他期刊一起提供这些出版类型,我们希望在我们的科学领域提升方法严谨性的标准。这将确保我们的发现基于可靠的证据,并为未来的进展提供坚实的基础。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results.促进行为神经科学的透明度和可重复性:发表重复研究、注册报告和阴性结果。
Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug;131(4):275-276. doi: 10.1037/bne0000207.
2
Science in flux: Registered reports and beyond at the European Journal of Neuroscience.不断变化的科学:《欧洲神经科学杂志》的注册报告及其他
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jan;49(1):4-5. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14319. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Replication and robustness in developmental research.发育研究中的重复性与稳健性。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2417-25. doi: 10.1037/a0037996. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.提高学术出版的透明度和科学严谨性。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;2(1):e1150. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1150. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
5
Medical journals--in the news and for the wrong reasons.医学期刊——登上新闻却原因不当。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2014 Jan-Mar;11(1):7-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2014.003.
6
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.编辑与出版商出版伦理声明。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.
7
Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.采用严谨透明指数建立机构评分:科学报告质量的大规模分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 27;24(6):e37324. doi: 10.2196/37324.
8
Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.确保生物医学出版物的完整性。
JAMA. 1987 Dec 18;258(23):3424-7.
9
On science and the discriminative law of effect.论科学与效果的辨别法则。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jan;83(1):85-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.27-04.
10
Frontloading selectivity: A third way in scientific publishing?前置选择性:科学出版的第三种方式?
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 25;18(3):e3000693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000693. eCollection 2020 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Object relations are processed with, but not without, awareness.客体关系在有觉知的情况下进行处理,但并非没有觉知。
Neurosci Conscious. 2025 May 8;2025(1):niaf010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaf010. eCollection 2025.
2
Moral character and competence judgments of sexual harassers and fraudsters in academic and business contexts.在学术和商业背景下对性骚扰者和欺诈者的道德品质和能力判断。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312930. eCollection 2024.
3
A standardized framework to test event-based experiments.一个用于测试基于事件的实验的标准化框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8852-8868. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02508-y. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.质量产出检查表和内容评估(QuOCCA):一种评估研究质量和可重复性的新工具。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 26;12(9):e060976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060976.
5
A System to Easily Manage Metadata in Biomedical Research Labs Based on Open-source Software.一种基于开源软件的、用于轻松管理生物医学研究实验室元数据的系统。
Bio Protoc. 2022 May 5;12(9):e4404. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4404.
6
A qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences with Registered Reports Funding Partnerships.对利益相关者在注册报告资助伙伴关系方面经历的定性分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Sep 14;6:230. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17029.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Intermodal Priming of Cognitive Conflict? A Failed Replication of Mager et al. (2009).认知冲突的多模态启动?对马杰等人(2009年)研究的一次失败的重复验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 11;15:680885. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.680885. eCollection 2021.
8
Training behavioural therapists in presession pairing skills to evaluate the impact on children's life skill acquisition rates.对行为治疗师进行会前配对技能培训,以评估其对儿童生活技能习得率的影响。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 Oct 27;66(5):339-347. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1827209. eCollection 2020.
9
Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations for the Use of Single Prolonged Stress and Fear Extinction Retention in Rodents.啮齿动物单一长期应激和恐惧消退记忆使用的系统评价及方法学考量
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 May 14;15:652636. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.652636. eCollection 2021.
10
Practical Considerations for Navigating Registered Reports.注册报告的实用考量。
Trends Neurosci. 2019 Sep;42(9):568-572. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.07.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Registered reports at the European Journal of Neuroscience: consolidating and extending peer-reviewed study pre-registration.《欧洲神经科学杂志》的注册报告:巩固和扩展同行评审研究预注册
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;45(5):627-628. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13519. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.科学中的 p-值操纵的程度和后果。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Mar 13;13(3):e1002106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106. eCollection 2015 Mar.
3
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电:为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
4
Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex.注册报告:《大脑皮层》的一项新出版举措。
Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):609-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
5
HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known.结果已知后提出假设(HARKing):结果已知后进行假设。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(3):196-217. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4.