• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What determines the preference for future living arrangements of middle-aged and older people in urban China?是什么决定了中国城市中老年人对未来居住安排的偏好?
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0180764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180764. eCollection 2017.
2
The effect of health status and living arrangements on long term care models among older Chinese: A cross-sectional study.健康状况和生活安排对中国老年人长期护理模式的影响:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0182219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182219. eCollection 2017.
3
Patterns in living arrangements and familial support for the elderly in the Philippines.菲律宾老年人的生活安排模式及家庭支持情况
Asia Pac Popul J. 1997 Dec;12(4):17-34.
4
[Care preferences and spatial mobility : Factors influencing care-related willingness to move of elderly people in partnerships in a rural area].[护理偏好与空间流动性:影响农村地区老年伴侣护理相关迁移意愿的因素]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Apr;50(3):200-209. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0991-z. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Comparative analysis of the expected demands for nursing care services among older people from urban, rural, and institutional environments.城市、农村和机构环境中老年人对护理服务预期需求的比较分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Feb 2;10:405-12. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S72534. eCollection 2015.
6
[The influence of types of living alone on 2-year health changes according to elderly adults' marital status: Based on the Comprehensive Regional Studies for Preventing Isolation of the Elderly Who Live in Metropolitan Area (CAPITAL Study)].[根据老年人婚姻状况,独居类型对其两年健康变化的影响:基于大都市地区老年人预防孤立综合区域研究(首都研究)]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2019;66(3):129-137. doi: 10.11236/jph.66.3_129.
7
The Expected Demand for Elderly Care Services and Anticipated Living Arrangements Among the Oldest Old in China Based on the Andersen Model.基于安德森模型的中国高龄老人对老年护理服务的预期需求及预期居住安排
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 5;9:715586. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.715586. eCollection 2021.
8
Living arrangements of ever-married older Lebanese women: is living with married children advantageous?曾经结过婚的黎巴嫩老年女性的居住安排:与已婚子女同住是否有益?
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2009 Mar;24(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s10823-008-9057-7. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
9
A study on the factors influencing the community participation of older adults in China: based on the CHARLS2011 data set.中国老年人社区参与影响因素研究:基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011数据集
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):1160-1168. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12415. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
An overview of the living arrangements and social support exchanges of older Singaporeans.新加坡老年人的居住安排与社会支持交流概述。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1997 Dec;12(4):35-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between widowhood and cognitive function among Chinese older adults with hearing impairment: the moderating effect of social support and participation.丧偶与听力障碍的中国老年人认知功能的关系:社会支持和参与的调节作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05358-7.
2
The dyadic effects of family resilience and social support on quality of life among older adults with chronic illness and their primary caregivers in multigenerational families in China: A cross-sectional study.中国多代同堂家庭中慢性病老年人及其主要照顾者的家庭复原力和社会支持对生活质量的二元影响:一项横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 29;10(5):e27351. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27351. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3
The Role of Contextual Factors in Shaping Urban Older Adults' Intention of Institutional Care in China: A Mixed-Methods Study.语境因素在中国塑造城市老年人机构养老意愿中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064731.
4
"What If I Die and No One Notices?" A Qualitative Study Exploring How Living Alone and in Poverty Impacts the Health and Well-Being of Older People in Hong Kong.“如果我死了却没人注意到怎么办?”——一项探究独居和贫困如何影响香港老年人健康和幸福感的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315856.
5
Older People's Long-Term Care Preferences in China: The Impact of Living with Grandchildren on Older People's Willingness and Family Decisions.中国老年人的长期护理偏好:与孙辈同住对老年人意愿和家庭决策的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;19(19):12455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912455.
6
Circumstances Precipitating Rural Older Adults for Co-Residential Family Care Arrangements in Central Ethiopia.促使埃塞俄比亚中部农村老年人接受家庭共同居住照料安排的情况。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Jul 18;8:23337214221113100. doi: 10.1177/23337214221113100. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Living arrangements of the elderly in China: evidence from the CHARLS national baseline.中国老年人的居住安排:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)全国基线调查的证据
China Economic J. 2015;8(3):191-214. doi: 10.1080/17538963.2015.1102473. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
2
The impact of a discrepancy between actual and preferred living arrangements on life satisfaction among the elderly in China.中国老年人实际居住安排与偏好居住安排之间的差异对生活满意度的影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):623-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)05.
3
Does co-residence with adult children associate with better psychological well-being among the oldest old in China?与成年子女同住是否与中国最年长老年人的更好的心理健康相关?
Aging Ment Health. 2014 Mar;18(2):232-9. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.837143. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
4
An industry in the making: the emergence of institutional elder care in urban china.正在兴起的行业:中国城市机构养老的出现。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Apr;59(4):738-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03330.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
5
Impact of home and community-based services on hospitalisation and institutionalisation among individuals eligible for long-term care insurance in Japan.在日本,符合长期护理保险资格的个人中,家庭和社区服务对住院和机构化的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 22;10:345. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-345.
6
Expectations of filial obligation and their impact on preferences for future living arrangements of middle-aged and older Asian Indian immigrants.对孝道义务的期望及其对中老年印度裔亚洲移民未来居住安排偏好的影响。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2011 Mar;26(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10823-010-9134-6.
7
Shifting coresidence near the end of life: comparing decedents and survivors of a follow-up study in China.临终前的核心共居转移:对中国一项随访研究的死者和幸存者进行比较。
Demography. 2010 Aug;47(3):537-54. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0116.
8
Household Context and Subjective Well-Being Among the Oldest Old in China.中国高龄老人的家庭环境与主观幸福感
J Fam Issues. 2008 Oct 1;29(10):1379-1403. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07313602.
9
Health among the oldest-old in China: which living arrangements make a difference?中国高龄老人的健康状况:哪种居住安排会产生影响?
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jan;68(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.013. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
A panel multinomial logit analysis of elderly living arrangements: evidence from Aging In Manitoba longitudinal data, Canada.老年人居住安排的面板多项logit分析:来自加拿大曼尼托巴省老龄化纵向数据的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Dec;65(12):2539-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.012. Epub 2007 Aug 31.

是什么决定了中国城市中老年人对未来居住安排的偏好?

What determines the preference for future living arrangements of middle-aged and older people in urban China?

作者信息

Meng Dijuan, Xu Guihua, He Ling, Zhang Min, Lin Dan

机构信息

Nursing College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0180764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180764. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0180764
PMID:28715433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5513423/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Living arrangements are important to the elderly. However, it is common for elderly parents in urban China to not have a living situation that they consider ideal. An understanding of their preferences assists us in responding to the needs of the elderly as well as in anticipating future long-term care demands. The aim of this study is to provide a clear understanding of preferences for future living arrangements and their associated factors among middle-aged and older people in urban China.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the CHARLS 2011-2012 national baseline survey of middle-aged and elderly people. In the 2011 wave of the CHARLS, a total of 17,708 individual participants (10,069 main respondents and 7,638 spouses) were interviewed; 2509 of the main respondents lived in urban areas. In this group, 41 people who were younger than 45 years old and 162 who had missing data in the variable "living arrangement preference" were excluded. Additionally, 42 people were excluded because they chose "other" for the variable "living arrangement preference" (which was a choice with no specific answer). Finally, a total of 2264 participants were included in our study.

RESULTS

The most popular preference for future living arrangements was living close to their children in the same community/neighborhoods, followed by living with adult children. The degree of community handicapped access, number of surviving children, age, marital status, access to community-based elderly care centers and number of years lived in the same community were significantly associated with the preferences for future living arrangements among the respondents.

CONCLUSION

There is a trend towards preference for living near adult children in urban China. Additionally, age has a positive effect on preference for living close to their children. Considerations should be made in housing design and urban community development plans to fulfill older adults' expectations. In addition, increasing the accessibility of public facilities in the residential area was important to the elderly, especially for those who preferred living in proximity to their children rather than co-residing with their children. We found that more surviving children were associated with a lower likelihood of choosing "institutionalization", and it positively contributed to preference for intergenerational living arrangements in our study. As expected, compared with their married counterparts, people who were separated/divorced/widowed preferred living with adult children rather than living independently. A relatively shorter length of residence in the same community was an important indicator of preference for independent living; this finding might require further research.

摘要

目的

居住安排对老年人很重要。然而,在中国城市地区,老年父母没有理想居住状况的情况很常见。了解他们的偏好有助于我们满足老年人的需求,并预测未来的长期护理需求。本研究的目的是清楚了解中国城市中老年人对未来居住安排的偏好及其相关因素。

方法

数据取自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011 - 2012年全国中老年基线调查。在2011年的CHARLS调查中,共访谈了17708名个体参与者(10069名主要受访者和7638名配偶);其中2509名主要受访者居住在城市地区。在这一组中,排除了41名年龄小于45岁的人以及162名在“居住安排偏好”变量中有缺失数据的人。此外,有42人因在“居住安排偏好”变量中选择了“其他”(这是一个无具体答案的选项)而被排除。最终,共有2264名参与者纳入我们的研究。

结果

未来居住安排最受欢迎的偏好是在同一社区/街区与子女住得近,其次是与成年子女同住。社区无障碍设施程度、存活子女数量、年龄、婚姻状况、是否有社区养老中心以及在同一社区居住的年数与受访者对未来居住安排的偏好显著相关。

结论

在中国城市,有倾向于在成年子女附近居住的趋势。此外,年龄对与子女住得近的偏好有积极影响。在住房设计和城市社区发展规划中应予以考虑,以满足老年人的期望。此外,提高居民区公共设施的可达性对老年人很重要,特别是对于那些更喜欢与子女住得近而不是与子女同住的人。我们发现,存活子女越多,选择“机构养老”的可能性越低,并且在我们的研究中对代际居住安排的偏好有积极贡献。正如预期的那样,与已婚者相比,分居/离婚/丧偶的人更喜欢与成年子女同住而不是独立生活。在同一社区居住时间相对较短是偏好独立生活的一个重要指标;这一发现可能需要进一步研究。