Nouwens Peter J G, Lucas Rosanne, Smulders Nienke B M, Embregts Petri J C M, van Nieuwenhuizen Chijs
Tranzo Department, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Prisma Foundation, Waalwijk, the Netherlands.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1426-8.
Persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning are often studied as a single group with similar characteristics. However, there are indications that differences exist within this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify classes of persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and to examine whether these classes are related to individual and/or environmental characteristics.
Latent class analysis was performed using file data of 250 eligible participants with a mean age of 26.1 (SD 13.8, range 3-70) years.
Five distinct classes of persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning were found. These classes significantly differed in individual and environmental characteristics. For example, persons with a mild intellectual disability experienced fewer problems than those with borderline intellectual disability.
The identification of five classes implies that a differentiated approach is required towards persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.
轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能的人群常被作为具有相似特征的单一群体进行研究。然而,有迹象表明该人群内部存在差异。因此,本研究的目的是识别轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能的人群类别,并考察这些类别是否与个体和/或环境特征相关。
使用250名符合条件的参与者的档案数据进行潜在类别分析,这些参与者的平均年龄为26.1岁(标准差13.8,范围3 - 70岁)。
发现了轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能的五个不同类别。这些类别在个体和环境特征上有显著差异。例如,轻度智力残疾者比边缘智力残疾者经历的问题更少。
识别出五个类别意味着需要对轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能的人群采取差异化方法。