Smith Helen, Ameh Charles, Roos Natalie, Mathai Matthews, Broek Nynke van den
Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6.
Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented the four essential components of MDSR and identify lessons for improving implementation.
A secondary analysis of ten case studies from countries at different stages of MDSR implementation, using a policy analysis framework to draw out lessons learnt and opportunities for improvement. We identify the consistent drivers of success in countries with well-established systems for MDSR, and common barriers in countries were Maternal Death Review (MDR) systems have been less successful.
MDR is accepted and ongoing at subnational level in many countries, but it is not adequately institutionalised and the shift from facility based MDR to continuous MDSR that informs the wider health system still needs to be made. Our secondary analysis of country experiences highlights the need for a) social and team processes at facility level, for example the existence of a 'no shame, no blame' culture, and the ability to reflect on practice and manage change as a team for recommendations to be acted upon, b) health system inputs including adequate funding and reliable health information systems to enable identification and analysis of cases c) national level coordination of dissemination, and monitoring implementation of recommendations at all levels and d) mandatory notification of maternal deaths (and enforcement of this) and a professional requirement to participate in MDRs.
Case studies from countries with established MDSR systems can provide valuable guidance on ways to set up the processes and overcome some of the barriers; but the challenge, as with many health system interventions, is to find a way to provide catalytic assistance and strengthen capacity for MDSR such that this becomes embedded in the health system.
全球都在对孕产妇死亡监测与应对(MDSR)的实施情况进行监测,但对于扩大规模过程中哪些方面运作良好、在何处以及为何运作良好,人们了解得并不多。我们回顾了一系列国家案例研究,以确定这些国家是否以及在多大程度上实施了MDSR的四个基本组成部分,并找出改进实施工作的经验教训。
对来自处于MDSR实施不同阶段国家的十个案例研究进行二次分析,使用政策分析框架来总结经验教训和改进机会。我们确定了在已建立完善MDSR系统的国家中取得成功的一致驱动因素,以及在孕产妇死亡审查(MDR)系统不太成功的国家中的常见障碍。
许多国家在地方层面已接受并正在开展MDR,但它没有得到充分的制度化,从基于机构的MDR向为更广泛的卫生系统提供信息的持续MDSR的转变仍有待实现。我们对国家经验的二次分析强调了以下几点的必要性:a)机构层面的社会和团队流程,例如存在“无羞辱、无责备”的文化,以及作为一个团队反思实践和管理变革以便建议能够得到落实的能力;b)卫生系统投入,包括充足的资金和可靠的卫生信息系统,以实现病例的识别和分析;c)国家层面的传播协调,以及对各级建议实施情况的监测;d)孕产妇死亡的强制报告(以及对此的执行)和参与MDR的专业要求。
来自已建立MDSR系统国家的案例研究可以为建立流程和克服一些障碍的方法提供有价值的指导;但与许多卫生系统干预措施一样,挑战在于找到一种提供催化性援助并加强MDSR能力的方法,使其融入卫生系统。