Suppr超能文献

双能X线吸收测定法

Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

作者信息

Jain Rajesh K, Vokes Tamara

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; Department of Medicine, Section of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140.

Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):291-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most commonly used method to assess fracture risk. DXA utilizes two different energy X-rays to calculate BMD and, by comparison to a young normative database, the T-score. In 1994, the World Health Organization defined osteoporosis based on T-score, changing the paradigm of the field and forever placing DXA measurements in the center of osteoporosis diagnosis. Since then, many large studies have demonstrated the predictive value of BMD by DXA-for every standard deviation decline in BMD, there is a relative risk of 1.5-2.5 for fracture. This predictive ability is similar to how blood pressure can predict myocardial infarction. Limitations of DXA are also important to consider. While BMD by DXA can identify those at risk, there is a significant overlap in the BMD of patients who will and will not fracture. Special considerations are also needed in men and ethnic minority groups. These groups may have different bone size, thus affecting the normative range of BMD, and/or distinct bone structure that affect the association between BMD and fractures. Finally, BMD can be affected by positioning errors or artifacts, including osteoarthritis, fracture, and jewelry. Of course, DXA has tremendous strengths as well-namely its wide availability, its low radiation exposure, and a large body of evidence that relate DXA measurements to fracture risk. For these reasons, DXA remains the cornerstone of fracture assessment now and for the foreseeable future.

摘要

通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量骨密度(BMD)是评估骨折风险最常用的方法。DXA利用两种不同能量的X线来计算骨密度,并通过与年轻人群的标准数据库进行比较得出T值。1994年,世界卫生组织基于T值对骨质疏松症进行了定义,改变了该领域的范式,并使DXA测量永远处于骨质疏松症诊断的核心地位。从那时起,许多大型研究都证明了DXA测量的骨密度具有预测价值——骨密度每下降一个标准差,骨折的相对风险为1.5至2.5。这种预测能力类似于血压对心肌梗死的预测方式。DXA的局限性也很重要,需要加以考虑。虽然DXA测量的骨密度可以识别出有风险的人群,但骨折患者和未骨折患者的骨密度存在显著重叠。男性和少数族裔群体也需要特殊考虑。这些群体可能有不同的骨骼大小,从而影响骨密度的正常范围,和/或有不同的骨骼结构,影响骨密度与骨折之间的关联。最后,骨密度会受到定位误差或伪影的影响,包括骨关节炎、骨折和佩戴的首饰。当然,DXA也有巨大的优势——即其广泛的可及性、低辐射暴露,以及大量将DXA测量与骨折风险相关联的证据。由于这些原因,DXA现在以及在可预见的未来仍然是骨折评估的基石。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验