Titos-García Alberto, Aranda-Narváez Jose M, Romacho-López Laura, González-Sánchez Antonio J, Cabrera-Serna Isaac, Santoyo-Santoyo Julio
Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit. General, Digestive and Transplantation Surgery Department, University Regional Hospital, Carlos Haya Av., 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1503-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2852-2. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
The aim of this study was to analyze the results of nonoperative management of patients with perforated acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air and to identify risk factors that may lead to failure and necessity of surgery.
Methods included observational retrospective cohort study of patients between 2010 and 2015 with diagnosis of diverticulitis with extraluminal air and with nonoperative management initial. Patient demographics, clinical, and analytical data were collected, as were data related with computed tomography. Univariate and multivariate analyses with Wald forward stepwise logistic regression were performed to analyze results and to identify risk factors potentially responsible of failure of nonoperative management.
Nonoperative management was established in 83.12% of patients diagnosed with perforated diverticulitis (64 of 77) with an overall success rate of 84.37%, a mean hospital stay of 11.98 ± 7.44 days and only one mortality (1.6%). Patients with pericolic air presented a greater chance of success (90.2%) than patients with distant air (61.5%). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III-IV (OR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.04-29.07) and the distant location of air (OR, 4.81; 95% CI, 1.03-22.38) were the only two factors identified in the multivariate analysis as risk factors for a poor nonoperative treatment outcome. Overall recurrence after conservative approach was 20.4%; however, recurrence rate of patients with distant air was twice than that of patients with pericolic air (37.5 vs 17.39%). Only 14.8% of successfully treated patients required surgery after the first episode.
Nonoperative management of perforated diverticulitis is safe and efficient. Special follow-up must be assumed in patients ASA III-IV and with distant air in CT.
本研究旨在分析伴有腔外气体的穿孔性急性憩室炎患者的非手术治疗结果,并确定可能导致治疗失败及手术必要性的危险因素。
采用观察性回顾性队列研究方法,研究对象为2010年至2015年间诊断为伴有腔外气体的憩室炎且初始接受非手术治疗的患者。收集患者的人口统计学、临床和分析数据以及与计算机断层扫描相关的数据。采用Wald向前逐步逻辑回归进行单因素和多因素分析,以分析结果并确定可能导致非手术治疗失败的危险因素。
在诊断为穿孔性憩室炎的患者中,83.12%(77例中的64例)接受了非手术治疗,总体成功率为84.37%,平均住院时间为11.98±7.44天,仅1例死亡(1.6%)。结肠周围有气体的患者比远处有气体的患者成功率更高(90.2%对61.5%)。多因素分析中确定的仅有的两个非手术治疗效果不佳的危险因素是美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级III-IV级(比值比,5.49;95%可信区间,1.04-29.07)和气体的远处位置(比值比,4.81;95%可信区间,1.03-22.38)。保守治疗后的总体复发率为20.4%;然而,远处有气体的患者的复发率是结肠周围有气体的患者的两倍(37.5%对17.39%)。首次发作后成功治疗的患者中只有14.8%需要手术。
穿孔性憩室炎的非手术治疗安全有效。对于ASA III-IV级且CT显示有远处气体的患者必须进行特殊随访。