• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于选择的患者,经皮穿刺引流联合抗生素治疗合并肠外气的穿孔性憩室炎是安全有效的。

Nonoperative management of perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal air is safe and effective in selected patients.

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):875-81. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000083.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000083
PMID:24901689
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for diverticulitis with extraluminal air is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of nonoperative treatment of acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at an academic teaching hospital functioning as both a tertiary and secondary care referral center.

PATIENTS

All of the patients with CT-diagnosed acute perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal air from 2006 through 2010 were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Nonoperative treatment composed of intravenous antibiotics, bowel rest, and percutaneous drainage were the included interventions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The need for operative management and mortality were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients underwent nonoperative treatment, whereas 48 patients were primarily operated on. Patients treated nonoperatively were divided into 3 groups on the basis of identified factors that independently predicted risk for failure: 1) patients with pericolic air (n = 82) without abscess had a 99% success rate with 0% mortality. 2) Patients with distant intraperitoneal air (n = 29) had a 62% success ratewith 0% mortality. Abundant distant intraperitoneal air and fluid in the fossa Douglas were identified as risk factors for failure. Patients without these risk factors had an 86% success rate with nonoperative management. 3) Patients with distant retroperitoneal air (n = 14) had a 43% success rate with 7% mortality.

LIMITATIONS

Comparison of nonoperative versus operative treatment cannot be made because of the study's retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative treatment of acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air is safe and effective in patients with a small amount of distant intraperitoneal air or pericolic air without clinical signs of peritonitis.

摘要

背景

伴腔外积气的憩室炎的最佳治疗方法存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在评估非手术治疗伴腔外积气的急性憩室炎的安全性和有效性。

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

地点

该研究在一家学术教学医院进行,该医院既是三级和二级转诊中心。

患者

所有 CT 诊断为伴腔外积气的急性穿孔性憩室炎患者均纳入本研究。

干预措施

包括静脉内使用抗生素、肠道休息和经皮引流的非手术治疗。

主要观察指标

手术管理的需求和死亡率。

结果

共有 132 例患者接受了非手术治疗,而 48 例患者最初接受了手术。根据独立预测失败风险的因素,非手术治疗的患者分为 3 组:1)有结肠旁积气(n=82)而无脓肿的患者,成功率为 99%,死亡率为 0%。2)有远处腹腔内积气(n=29)的患者,成功率为 62%,死亡率为 0%。大量远处腹腔内积气和 Douglas 窝内液体被认为是失败的危险因素。无这些危险因素的患者,非手术治疗的成功率为 86%。3)有远处腹膜后积气(n=14)的患者,成功率为 43%,死亡率为 7%。

局限性

由于研究的回顾性性质,无法比较非手术治疗与手术治疗。

结论

对于少量远处腹腔内积气或无腹膜炎临床征象的结肠旁积气的急性憩室炎患者,非手术治疗是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Nonoperative management of perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal air is safe and effective in selected patients.对于选择的患者,经皮穿刺引流联合抗生素治疗合并肠外气的穿孔性憩室炎是安全有效的。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):875-81. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000083.
2
Non-operative management of perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal or free air - a retrospective single center cohort study.伴有腔外积气或游离气体的穿孔性憩室炎的非手术治疗——一项回顾性单中心队列研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1298-1303. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1520291. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Nonoperative management of perforated acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air: results and risk factors of failure.伴有腔外气体的穿孔性急性憩室炎的非手术治疗:结果及失败的危险因素
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1503-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2852-2. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
The efficacy of nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis.急性复杂性憩室炎非手术治疗的疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jun;54(6):663-71. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820ef759.
5
A Systematic Review of Pericolic Extraluminal Air in Left-Sided Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.左侧急性结肠憩室炎结肠旁腔外气体的系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 May/Jun;19(4):362-368. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.236. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
Diverticular Abscess Managed With Long-term Definitive Nonoperative Intent Is Safe.采用长期确定性非手术治疗方案管理憩室脓肿是安全的。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jul;59(7):648-55. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000624.
7
Management of acute diverticulitis with pericolic free gas (ADIFAS): an international multicenter observational study.有结肠旁游离气体的急性憩室炎的处理(ADIFAS):一项国际多中心观察性研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Apr 1;109(4):689-697. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000213.
8
The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography.复杂性憩室炎的管理及计算机断层扫描的作用
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41154.x.
9
Acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air: is conservative treatment sufficient? A single-center retrospective study.伴有腔外积气的急性憩室炎:保守治疗足够了吗?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Apr 25;28(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02928-0.
10
Nonoperative management of right colonic diverticulitis using radiologic evaluation.采用放射学评估对右结肠憩室炎进行非手术治疗。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Feb;12(2):105-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01734.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Emerging Role of the Microbiota and Antibiotics in Diverticulitis Treatment.微生物群和抗生素在憩室炎治疗中的新作用
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Sep 30;38(4):269-276. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791521. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Managing Perforated Diverticulitis: An Overview of Treatment Trends and Clinical Outcomes at a Single Centre in the United Kingdom.治疗穿孔性憩室炎:英国某单一中心的治疗趋势与临床结果概述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):e72591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72591. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Intra-abdominal infections survival guide: a position statement by the Global Alliance For Infections In Surgery.
腹腔内感染生存指南:全球外科感染联盟的立场声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 8;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00552-9.
4
Acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air: is conservative treatment sufficient? A single-center retrospective study.伴有腔外积气的急性憩室炎:保守治疗足够了吗?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Apr 25;28(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02928-0.
5
Towards a tailored approach for patients with acute diverticulitis and abscess formation. The DivAbsc2023 multicentre case-control study.针对伴有急性憩室炎和脓肿形成的患者的个体化治疗方法。DivAbsc2023 多中心病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3180-3194. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10793-z. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
German guideline diverticular disease/diverticulitis: Part II: Conservative, interventional and surgical management.德国指南:憩室疾病/憩室炎;第二部分:保守治疗、介入治疗和手术治疗。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):940-957. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12313. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Current Aspects on the Management of Perforated Acute Diverticulitis: A Narrative Review.急性穿孔性憩室炎管理的当前进展:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2022 Aug 26;14(8):e28446. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28446. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Safety of robotic surgical management of non-elective colectomies for diverticulitis compared to laparoscopic surgery.与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术治疗非择期憩室炎结肠切除术的安全性。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01452-3. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Distant free air is not a contraindication for definitive laparoscopic treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis: a multi-center experience.远处游离气不是急性穿孔性憩室炎腹腔镜确定性治疗的禁忌证:多中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1665-1673. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01324-3. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
10
The WSES/SICG/ACOI/SICUT/AcEMC/SIFIPAC guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute left colonic diverticulitis in the elderly.《WSES/SICG/ACOI/SICUT/AcEMC/SIFIPAC 老年急性左半结肠憩室炎诊治指南》。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00408-0.