Suppr超能文献

儿童周期性呕吐综合征的预防性治疗:阿米替林与赛庚啶的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Prophylactic Therapy of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome in Children: Comparison of Amitriptyline and Cyproheptadine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;113(1):135-140. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.194. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of nausea and vomiting. There is no definite treatment for the condition, although some medications are recommended. We aimed to compare the efficacy of amitriptyline and cyproheptadine in prophylactic therapy of CVS.

METHODS

This is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted during 2015-2016 in Isfahan, Iran. Sixty-four children who were 3-15 years old, with a diagnosis of CVS (based on Rome III criteria), were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups of amitriptyline and cyproheptadine. They were followed for 6 months, looking for frequency and duration of attacks as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The mean monthly frequency of attacks in the last 2 months of the study in the amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 0.38±0.55 and 0.59±0.71, respectively (P-value=0.197), after intervention. The mean duration of attacks between amitriptyline and cyproheptadine group were 1.41±2.86 and 1.81±2.22 h, respectively (P-value=0.212). In the amitriptyline group 65.6% of patients reported 100% remission, whereas in the cyproheptadine group 50% reported full remission (P-value=0.206).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no superiority of one of the medications over the other. We did not find any age-related effect on the efficacy of these medications as well.

摘要

目的

周期性呕吐综合征(CVS)是一种常见的功能性胃肠道疾病,其特征为反复出现恶心和呕吐。目前该病尚无明确的治疗方法,但推荐使用一些药物。本研究旨在比较阿米替林和赛庚啶在预防 CVS 中的疗效。

方法

这是 2015-2016 年在伊朗伊斯法罕进行的一项单盲随机临床试验。共有 64 名年龄在 3-15 岁之间、符合 CVS 诊断(基于罗马 III 标准)的儿童被纳入本研究,并随机分为阿米替林组和赛庚啶组。对其进行为期 6 个月的随访,以寻找发作频率和持续时间作为主要结局。

结果

在研究的最后 2 个月,阿米替林组和赛庚啶组每月发作频率的平均值分别为 0.38±0.55 和 0.59±0.71(P 值=0.197)。阿米替林组和赛庚啶组发作持续时间的平均值分别为 1.41±2.86 和 1.81±2.22 小时(P 值=0.212)。阿米替林组中 65.6%的患者报告完全缓解,而赛庚啶组中 50%的患者报告完全缓解(P 值=0.206)。

结论

两种药物之间没有优势。我们也没有发现这些药物的疗效与年龄有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验