Lum Hillary D, Sudore Rebecca L, Matlock Daniel D, Juarez-Colunga Elizabeth, Jones Jacqueline, Nowels Molly, Schwartz Robert S, Kutner Jean S, Levy Cari R
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):480-490. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036.
Group visits for advance care planning (ACP) may help patients document preferences for decision makers and future care. We assessed the impact of a primary care-based ACP group visit (ACP-GV) intervention on older adults' ACP documentation and why patients participated.
Older adults (>65 years) in primary care participated in a 2-session ACP-GV intervention that promotes group dynamics, peer-based learning, and goal setting. Charts were reviewed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months for documentation of decision makers and ACP forms. We described patients' reasons for participating through analysis of transcripts.
118 patients (mean age 76 years; 62% female and 82% white) participated in 16 ACP-GV cohorts. From baseline to 3-month follow-up, documentation of decision maker preferences increased from 39% to 81%, and was 89% at 12-month follow-up. Patients with completed ACP forms increased from 20% to 57% at 3 months, and was 67% at 12 months. Reasons for participating included recognizing the importance of ACP, curiosity, participation recommended by primary care provider, desire to talk with family/friends, and desire to complete advance directives.
This ACP-GV intervention increased ACP documentation among patients with diverse reasons for participating. This is a patient-centered approach to ACP in primary care.
开展预先护理计划(ACP)的小组访视可能有助于患者记录对决策者和未来护理的偏好。我们评估了基于初级保健的ACP小组访视(ACP-GV)干预措施对老年人ACP记录的影响以及患者参与的原因。
初级保健机构中年龄大于65岁的老年人参加了为期两期的ACP-GV干预,该干预促进了团队互动、同伴学习和目标设定。在基线、3个月和12个月时对病历进行审查,以查看决策者和ACP表格的记录情况。我们通过对文字记录的分析来描述患者参与的原因。
118名患者(平均年龄76岁;62%为女性,82%为白人)参加了16个ACP-GV队列。从基线到3个月随访,决策者偏好的记录从39%增加到81%,在12个月随访时为89%。完成ACP表格的患者在3个月时从20%增加到57%,在12个月时为67%。参与的原因包括认识到ACP的重要性、好奇心、初级保健提供者的推荐、希望与家人/朋友交谈以及希望完成预先指示。
这种ACP-GV干预增加了参与原因各异的患者的ACP记录。这是初级保健中一种以患者为中心的ACP方法。