Suppr超能文献

一项团体就诊倡议改善了基层医疗中老年人的预先护理计划文件记录。

A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care.

作者信息

Lum Hillary D, Sudore Rebecca L, Matlock Daniel D, Juarez-Colunga Elizabeth, Jones Jacqueline, Nowels Molly, Schwartz Robert S, Kutner Jean S, Levy Cari R

机构信息

From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):480-490. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Group visits for advance care planning (ACP) may help patients document preferences for decision makers and future care. We assessed the impact of a primary care-based ACP group visit (ACP-GV) intervention on older adults' ACP documentation and why patients participated.

METHODS

Older adults (>65 years) in primary care participated in a 2-session ACP-GV intervention that promotes group dynamics, peer-based learning, and goal setting. Charts were reviewed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months for documentation of decision makers and ACP forms. We described patients' reasons for participating through analysis of transcripts.

RESULTS

118 patients (mean age 76 years; 62% female and 82% white) participated in 16 ACP-GV cohorts. From baseline to 3-month follow-up, documentation of decision maker preferences increased from 39% to 81%, and was 89% at 12-month follow-up. Patients with completed ACP forms increased from 20% to 57% at 3 months, and was 67% at 12 months. Reasons for participating included recognizing the importance of ACP, curiosity, participation recommended by primary care provider, desire to talk with family/friends, and desire to complete advance directives.

CONCLUSIONS

This ACP-GV intervention increased ACP documentation among patients with diverse reasons for participating. This is a patient-centered approach to ACP in primary care.

摘要

引言

开展预先护理计划(ACP)的小组访视可能有助于患者记录对决策者和未来护理的偏好。我们评估了基于初级保健的ACP小组访视(ACP-GV)干预措施对老年人ACP记录的影响以及患者参与的原因。

方法

初级保健机构中年龄大于65岁的老年人参加了为期两期的ACP-GV干预,该干预促进了团队互动、同伴学习和目标设定。在基线、3个月和12个月时对病历进行审查,以查看决策者和ACP表格的记录情况。我们通过对文字记录的分析来描述患者参与的原因。

结果

118名患者(平均年龄76岁;62%为女性,82%为白人)参加了16个ACP-GV队列。从基线到3个月随访,决策者偏好的记录从39%增加到81%,在12个月随访时为89%。完成ACP表格的患者在3个月时从20%增加到57%,在12个月时为67%。参与的原因包括认识到ACP的重要性、好奇心、初级保健提供者的推荐、希望与家人/朋友交谈以及希望完成预先指示。

结论

这种ACP-GV干预增加了参与原因各异的患者的ACP记录。这是初级保健中一种以患者为中心的ACP方法。

相似文献

1
A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):480-490. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036.
2
Effectiveness of Advance Care Planning Group Visits Among Older Adults in Primary Care.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2382-2389. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16694. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):24-27. doi: 10.1177/1049909118791126. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Evaluation of an initiative to improve advance care planning for a home-based primary care service.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02035-x.
9
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Virtual Group Advance Care Planning Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;41(10):1238-1245. doi: 10.1177/10499091241233687. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

5
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Virtual Group Advance Care Planning Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;41(10):1238-1245. doi: 10.1177/10499091241233687. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
Group medicare wellness visits: A pilot exploration of an approach to wellness and preventive medicine for older adults.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Nov 10;36:102514. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102514. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Community-led, peer-facilitated Advance Care Planning workshops prompt increased Advance Care Planning behaviors among public attendees.
PEC Innov. 2023 Aug 21;3:100199. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100199. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
9
Using behavioral theory to adapt advance care planning for homeless-experienced older adults in permanent supportive housing.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Aug;71(8):2615-2626. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18314. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Telecommunication for Advance Care Planning in Heart Failure.
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Apr 4;8:e11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.23. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare and End-of-Life Care.
JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1754. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15577.
2
Advance Care Planning: Understanding Clinical Routines and Experiences of Interprofessional Team Members in Diverse Health Care Settings.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;34(10):946-953. doi: 10.1177/1049909116666358. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Effect of Primary Care Involvement on End-of-Life Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):1968-1974. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14315. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Can Playing an End-of-Life Conversation Game Motivate People to Engage in Advance Care Planning?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;34(8):754-761. doi: 10.1177/1049909116656353. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
5
Utilization of Patient Electronic Messaging to Promote Advance Care Planning in the Primary Care Setting.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Aug;34(7):665-670. doi: 10.1177/1049909116650237. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1213-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1679.
9
U.S. General Population Estimate for "Excellent" to "Poor" Self-Rated Health Item.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1511-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3290-x. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116629. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验