Wu Yujie, Wu Shifei, Liang Chong, Luo Yuan, Sun Xiaonan, Zhang Xinyue, Deng Yuqian, Wu Yibo, He Miao
School of Medical, Xi'an Siyuan University, No.28 Shuian Road, Baqiao District, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
School of Humanities and Social Science, Harbin Medical University, No.157 Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, 150081, China.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 20;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01603-3.
Advance care planning is an important part of palliative care. Public acceptance is a prerequisite for the widespread development and implementation of advance care planning. However, little is known about the level of public's acceptance and influencing factors of advance care planning across different life cycles.
A cross-sectional study in mainland China was conducted from June 20 to August 31, 2022. We used multi-stage sampling strategy to recruit participators. A stepwise linear regression analysis was used to examine the influencing factors in different life cycles (nonage, mature age, middle age and old age).
The final sample size was 18,002. The average acceptance score of advance care planning of the public throughout the entire life cycle was 64.03. The average score in nonage was 67.13, which is the highest. The average score in mature age was 63.87, in middle age was 63.51, and in old age was 63.54. Multiple linear stepwise regression results indicated that death education support level, well-being index, neighbor relations, health literacy, family social status, and siblings were influencing factors in nonage. Medical insurance, injury events, multiple properties, death education support level, health literacy, family social status, neighbor relation, social support, family health, media contact, and well-being index were influencing factors in mature age. In middle age, region, living alone, depression, debt, houses, death education support level, health literacy, social support, and family social status were influencing factors. In old age, injury event, death education support level, neighbor relation, well-being index, siblings and children were influencing factors.
This study is the first to compare the Chinese people with different life cycles. It found that the public's acceptance and influencing factors of advance care planning varied across different life cycles. Governments and health care personnel should emphasize autonomy and initiate advance care planning based on different life cycles and individual approaches, then introduce appropriate public health policies into newer and broader fields.
预先护理计划是姑息治疗的重要组成部分。公众接受度是预先护理计划广泛发展和实施的前提条件。然而,对于不同生命周期中公众对预先护理计划的接受程度及其影响因素知之甚少。
于2022年6月20日至8月31日在中国大陆进行了一项横断面研究。我们采用多阶段抽样策略招募参与者。采用逐步线性回归分析来研究不同生命周期(儿童期、成年期、中年期和老年期)的影响因素。
最终样本量为18002。公众在整个生命周期中对预先护理计划的平均接受得分为64.03。儿童期的平均得分为67.13,为最高。成年期的平均得分为63.87,中年期为63.51,老年期为63.54。多元线性逐步回归结果表明,死亡教育支持水平、幸福感指数、邻里关系、健康素养、家庭社会地位和兄弟姐妹数量是儿童期的影响因素。医疗保险、伤害事件、财产数量、死亡教育支持水平、健康素养、家庭社会地位、邻里关系、社会支持、家庭健康状况、媒体接触和幸福感指数是成年期的影响因素。在中年期,地区、独居、抑郁、债务、房产、死亡教育支持水平、健康素养、社会支持和家庭社会地位是影响因素。在老年期,伤害事件、死亡教育支持水平、邻里关系、幸福感指数、兄弟姐妹数量和子女情况是影响因素。
本研究首次对不同生命周期的中国人进行了比较。研究发现,公众对预先护理计划的接受程度及其影响因素在不同生命周期中存在差异。政府和医护人员应强调自主性,并根据不同生命周期和个体情况启动预先护理计划,然后将适当的公共卫生政策引入更新、更广泛的领域。