University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):1968-1974. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14315. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
To investigate the relationship between primary care involvement in end-of-life (EOL) care and health and utilization outcomes.
Systematic review using MEDLINE and Web of Science.
All English literature published between 1994 and August 31, 2014, that included terms related to primary care providers (PCPs), continuity of care, EOL care, and palliative care.
Individuals receiving care from a PCP at the end of life.
Study design, subject characteristics, study outcomes and results.
Of 2,812 studies screened, 13 were included in this study. The studies were mostly conducted in the United States (n = 5) and Canada (n = 4) and analyzed data collected from 1989 to 2010. Almost all studies used different definitions of PCP involvement in care, but in general, individuals who received more care from PCPs were more likely to be discharged or die with supportive care (home or hospice) than those receiving less PCP care. A few studies indicated that individuals seeing a PCP were less likely to have hospital or emergency department admissions, although the evidence for this was mixed. Studies linking PCP involvement to resource use, symptom management, and survival had mixed results or showed no association.
When PCPs are involved in EOL care, people are more likely to die out of the hospital. Thus, the relationship with the PCP may be particularly important in EOL care, because PCPs may help individual establish goals of care and determine treatment preferences.
调查初级保健在临终关怀中的参与程度与健康和利用结果之间的关系。
使用 MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 进行系统评价。
1994 年至 2014 年 8 月 31 日期间发表的所有英文文献,其中包括与初级保健提供者(PCP)、连续性护理、临终关怀和姑息治疗相关的术语。
在生命末期接受 PCP 护理的个人。
研究设计、研究对象特征、研究结果。
在筛选出的 2812 项研究中,有 13 项被纳入本研究。这些研究主要在美国(n = 5)和加拿大(n = 4)进行,分析了 1989 年至 2010 年收集的数据。几乎所有的研究都使用了不同的 PCP 参与护理的定义,但总的来说,从 PCP 处获得更多护理的个体更有可能接受支持性护理(家庭或临终关怀)出院或死亡,而接受较少 PCP 护理的个体则不太可能接受 PCP 护理。少数研究表明,与接受较少 PCP 护理的个体相比,接受 PCP 治疗的个体不太可能因医院或急诊就诊而入院,尽管这方面的证据存在差异。将 PCP 参与与资源使用、症状管理和生存联系起来的研究结果喜忧参半或无关联。
当 PCP 参与临终关怀时,人们更有可能在医院外死亡。因此,与 PCP 的关系在临终关怀中可能特别重要,因为 PCP 可能有助于个人确定护理目标并确定治疗偏好。