The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6120-6127. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0980. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
Ethnic differences are conspicuous in melanoma. This study is to obtain a comprehensive view of a genomic landscape and a better understanding of the correlations of gene mutation status with clinicopathologic characteristics and disease prognosis in the Asian population. A total of 2,793 melanoma patient samples were retrospectively collected and analyzed for mutations in C-KIT, BRAF, NRAS, and PDGFRA coding regions and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter region by Sanger sequencing. Mutations were correlated to clinicopathologic features and overall survival. The incidences of somatic mutations within the BRAF, NRAS, C-KIT, TERT-228, TERT-250, and PDGFRA genes were 23.7%, 10.4%, 8.0%, 5.9%, 5.5%, and 1.4%, respectively. Hotspot mutations accounted for 95.8% and 87.2% of BRAF and NRAS mutations, respectively; meanwhile, C-KIT and PDGFRA mutations showed more heterogeneity. BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS mutations were mutually exclusive. BRAF, C-KIT, NRAS, and numbers of gene mutations of the MAPK pathway were all independent negative prognostic factors ( = 0.007, other < 0.001, respectively). In acral melanoma, BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS mutations were all independent prognostic factors of worse overall survival (all < 0.001), whereas in mucosal melanoma, only C-KIT was ( = 0.006). Although correlated with BRAF mutations ( = 0.001 and < 0.001 for C228T and C250T, respectively), TERT promoter gene mutations were not correlated with overall survival ( = 0.406 and 0.256, respectively). The MAPK pathway and TERT promoter gene mutations are differentially represented in the Asian population. Mutations in BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS have prognostic values that vary by melanoma subtypes. Clinical treatment targeting these critical pathways should be aimed directly at these poor-prognosis subpopulations for maximum potential impact. .
黑色素瘤存在明显的种族差异。本研究旨在全面了解基因组图谱,并更好地理解基因突变状态与亚洲人群临床病理特征和疾病预后的相关性。通过 Sanger 测序,回顾性收集并分析了 2793 例黑色素瘤患者样本中 C-KIT、BRAF、NRAS 和 PDGFRA 编码区以及端粒酶逆转录酶(TERT)启动子区的突变。突变与临床病理特征和总生存期相关。BRAF、NRAS、C-KIT、TERT-228、TERT-250 和 PDGFRA 基因的体细胞突变发生率分别为 23.7%、10.4%、8.0%、5.9%、5.5%和 1.4%。热点突变分别占 BRAF 和 NRAS 突变的 95.8%和 87.2%;同时,C-KIT 和 PDGFRA 突变表现出更大的异质性。BRAF、C-KIT 和 NRAS 突变相互排斥。BRAF、C-KIT、NRAS 和 MAPK 通路的基因突变数量均为独立的负预后因素( = 0.007,其他均 < 0.001)。肢端黑色素瘤中,BRAF、C-KIT 和 NRAS 突变均为总生存期更差的独立预后因素(均 < 0.001),而黏膜黑色素瘤中仅 C-KIT 为独立预后因素( = 0.006)。尽管 TERT 启动子基因突变与 BRAF 突变相关(C228T 和 C250T 分别为 = 0.001 和 < 0.001),但与总生存期无关(分别为 = 0.406 和 0.256)。亚洲人群中 MAPK 通路和 TERT 启动子基因突变存在差异。BRAF、C-KIT 和 NRAS 突变具有不同的预后价值,其与黑色素瘤亚型相关。针对这些关键通路的临床治疗应直接针对这些预后不良的亚群,以发挥最大的潜在影响。