Saran Jagroop Singh, Hoefnagel Amie L, Skinner Kristin A, Feng Changyong, Smith Daryl Irving
Acute Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry.
Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center.
J Pain Res. 2017 Jun 28;10:1487-1492. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S135973. eCollection 2017.
The role of thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) in decreasing opioid requirements in breast cancer surgery is well documented, and there is mounting evidence that this may improve survival and reduce the rate of malignancy recurrence following cancer-related mastectomy. We compared the two techniques currently in use at our institution, the anatomic landmark-guided (ALG) multilevel versus an ultrasound-guided (USG) single injection, to determine an optimal technique.
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who received TPVB from January 2013 to December 2014. Perioperative opioid use, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores and length of stay, block performance, and complications were compared between the two groups.
We found no statistical difference between the two approaches in the studied outcomes. We did find that the number of times attending physicians in the ALG group took over the blocks from residents was significantly greater than that of the USG group (=0.006) and more local anesthetic was used in the USG group (=0.04).
This study compared the ALG approach with the USG approach for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Based on our observations, an attending physician is more likely to take over an ALG injection, and more local anesthetic is administered during USG single injection.
胸段椎旁阻滞(TPVB)在降低乳腺癌手术中阿片类药物需求量方面的作用已有充分记录,并且越来越多的证据表明,这可能会提高生存率并降低与癌症相关的乳房切除术后恶性肿瘤复发率。我们比较了本机构目前使用的两种技术,即解剖标志引导(ALG)多级阻滞与超声引导(USG)单次注射,以确定最佳技术。
我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2014年12月接受TPVB治疗的患者的记录。比较了两组患者围手术期阿片类药物的使用情况、麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的疼痛评分和住院时间、阻滞操作情况及并发症。
我们发现两种方法在所研究的结果方面无统计学差异。我们确实发现,ALG组主治医师从住院医师手中接管阻滞操作的次数显著多于USG组(P = 0.006),且USG组使用的局部麻醉剂更多(P = 0.04)。
本研究比较了乳腺癌乳房切除术患者的ALG方法和USG方法。基于我们的观察,主治医师更有可能接管ALG注射,并且在USG单次注射期间使用更多的局部麻醉剂。