Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Obes Rev. 2017 Nov;18(11):1350-1363. doi: 10.1111/obr.12580. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of interventions to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) or increase water intakes and to examine the impact of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in consumption patterns. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials published after January 1990 and until December 2016 reporting daily changes in intakes of SSB or water in volumetric measurements (mL d ) were included. References were retrieved through searches of electronic databases and quality appraisal followed Cochrane principles. We calculated mean differences (MD) and synthesized data with random-effects models. Forty studies with 16 505 participants were meta-analysed. Interventions significantly decreased consumption of SSB in children by 76 mL d (95% confidence interval [CI] -105 to -46; 23 studies, P < 0.01), and in adolescents (-66 mL d , 95% CI -130 to -2; 5 studies, P = 0.04) but not in adults (-13 mL d , 95% CI -44 to 18; 12 studies, P = 0.16). Pooled estimates of water intakes were only possible for interventions in children, and results were indicative of increases in water intake (MD +67 mL d , 95% CI 6 to 128; 7 studies, P = 0.04). For children, there was evidence to suggest that modelling/demonstrating the behaviour helped to reduce SSB intake and that interventions within the home environment had greater effects than school-based interventions. In conclusion, public health interventions - mainly via nutritional education/counselling - are moderately successful at reducing intakes of SSB and increasing water intakes in children. However, on average, only small reductions in SSBs have been achieved by interventions targeting adolescents and adults. Complementary measures may be needed to achieve greater improvements in both dietary behaviours across all age groups.
系统评价和荟萃分析评估了减少含糖饮料(SSB)或增加水摄入量的干预措施的效果,并研究了行为改变技术(BCT)对消费模式的影响。纳入了 1990 年 1 月以后至 2016 年 12 月期间发表的、报告 SSB 或水的摄入量以容量单位(毫升/天)变化的随机和非随机对照试验。通过电子数据库检索参考文献,并根据 Cochrane 原则进行质量评估。我们计算了均值差(MD),并用随机效应模型综合数据。对 40 项涉及 16505 名参与者的研究进行了荟萃分析。干预措施显著降低了儿童 SSB 的摄入量,每天减少 76 毫升(95%置信区间[CI]:-105 至-46;23 项研究,P<0.01),青少年减少 66 毫升(95%CI:-130 至-2;5 项研究,P=0.04),但对成年人无影响(减少 13 毫升/天,95%CI:-44 至 18;12 项研究,P=0.16)。仅对儿童干预措施可以计算水摄入量的汇总估计,结果表明水摄入量增加(MD+67 毫升/天,95%CI:6 至 128;7 项研究,P=0.04)。对于儿童,有证据表明,示范行为有助于减少 SSB 的摄入量,家庭环境中的干预措施比学校环境中的干预措施更有效。总之,以营养教育/咨询为主的公共卫生干预措施在减少儿童 SSB 摄入量和增加水摄入量方面取得了一定成效。然而,针对青少年和成年人的干预措施平均仅使 SSB 摄入量略有减少。可能需要采取补充措施,以在所有年龄段都改善这两种饮食行为。